Suppr超能文献

血小板和瞬时弹性成像对临床显著门静脉高压新诊断标准的验证。

Validation of the New Diagnostic Criteria for Clinically Significant Portal Hypertension by Platelets and Elastography.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Split, Split, Croatia.

Department of Pharmacology, University of Zagreb School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia.

出版信息

Dig Dis Sci. 2022 Jul;67(7):3327-3332. doi: 10.1007/s10620-021-07277-8. Epub 2021 Nov 5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

We aimed to validate newly proposed noninvasive criteria for diagnosing clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) using liver stiffness measurements (LSM) by transient elastography (TE) and platelet count.

METHODS

Diagnostic performance of these new criteria for CSPH (LSM ≥ 25 kPa to rule in and Plt ≥ 150 × 10/L + LSM ≤ 15 kPa to rule out CSPH) were retrospectively tested in an independent cohort of consecutive patients who underwent hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) measurements and liver biopsy due to suspicion of compensated advanced chronic liver disease. Suspicion of cACLD was based on LSM ≥ 10 kPa by TE or results of liver imaging, without overt signs of CSPH. Patients with conditions known to affect results of LSM (ALT > 5 × ULN, liver congestion, extrahepatic biliary obstruction, infiltrative liver neoplasms) were excluded.

RESULTS

Seventy six (76) patients were included: 78.9% males, mean age 62 years, 36.8% suffered from alcoholic, 30.3% nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, 14.5% chronic viral hepatitis, 30.3% were obese, 52.6% had HVPG ≥ 10 mmHg, 56.6% had platelet count ≥ 150 × 10/L. LSM ≥ 25 kPa had 88.9% specificity (95% CI 73.9-96.9) to rule in, whereas Plt ≥ 150 + LSM ≤ 15 kPa had 100% sensitivity (95% CI 91.1-100) to rule out CSPH.

CONCLUSION

By using these simple noninvasive criteria 49/76 (64.5%) patients could be classified correctly for the presence/absence of CSPH, thus obviating the need for HVPG measurements.

摘要

背景与目的

我们旨在通过瞬时弹性成像(TE)和血小板计数验证新提出的用于诊断临床显著门静脉高压(CSPH)的非侵入性标准。

方法

我们在因怀疑代偿性晚期慢性肝病而行肝静脉压力梯度(HVPG)测量和肝活检的连续患者的独立队列中回顾性测试了这些新的 CSPH 标准的诊断性能(LSM≥25kPa 为阳性,Plt≥150×10/L+LSM≤15kPa 为阴性)。怀疑 cACLD 是基于 TE 检测的 LSM≥10kPa 或肝脏影像学结果,而没有 CSPH 的明显迹象。排除了已知会影响 LSM 结果的疾病(ALT>5×ULN、肝脏充血、肝外胆道阻塞、浸润性肝肿瘤)。

结果

76 例患者被纳入:78.9%为男性,平均年龄 62 岁,36.8%为酒精性,30.3%为非酒精性脂肪性肝病,14.5%为慢性病毒性肝炎,30.3%为肥胖症,52.6%为 HVPG≥10mmHg,56.6%为血小板计数≥150×10/L。LSM≥25kPa 有 88.9%的特异性(95%CI 73.9-96.9)可以诊断为阳性,而 Plt≥150+LSM≤15kPa 有 100%的敏感性(95%CI 91.1-100)可以诊断为阴性。

结论

使用这些简单的非侵入性标准,76 例患者中有 49/76(64.5%)可以正确分类是否存在 CSPH,从而避免了 HVPG 测量的需要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0de9/8569849/ec8c7e9de0b7/10620_2021_7277_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验