• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

现在你看到了,现在你又看不到了:侧翼呈现诱导了词语具体性效应。

Now you see it, now you don't: Flanker presence induces the word concreteness effect.

机构信息

Department of Experimental Psychology, Ghent University, Belgium.

Laboratoire de Psychologie Cognitive, CNRS & Aix-Marseille University, France; Institute for Language, Communication and the Brain, Aix-Marseille University, France.

出版信息

Cognition. 2022 Jan;218:104945. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104945. Epub 2021 Oct 29.

DOI:10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104945
PMID:34740083
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8655615/
Abstract

Can the presence of unrelated flanker words change the way that lexical decisions are made to target words in the flankers task? Here we examined the impact of flanker presence on the effects of word concreteness. Target words had high or low concreteness ratings (e.g., fork, free) and were either presented in isolation or flanked to the left and right by an unrelated word (e.g., cold free cold) that was irrelevant for the task. Results revealed that the facilitatory effect of concreteness (faster responses to concrete words compared with abstract words) was significantly greater in the presence of flankers. A control experiment revealed the same pattern with pseudoword and nonword flankers. We conclude that the mere presence of flanking letter strings causes a greater depth of processing of target words. We further speculate that this might arise by flankers inducing a more "sentence-like" context by the presence of multiple, spatially distinct letter strings, that prohibits the use of more superficial decision processes and can be used to make lexical decisions to isolated words.

摘要

无关的侧显词是否会改变词汇决策任务中对侧显词的目标词的决策方式?在这里,我们研究了侧显词的存在对词具体性的影响。目标词具有高或低的具体性评分(例如,叉,自由),并且要么单独呈现,要么在左侧和右侧被无关的词(例如,冷自由冷)侧显,这些词与任务无关。结果表明,在存在侧显词的情况下,具体性的促进作用(与抽象词相比,对具体词的反应更快)要大得多。一个控制实验显示了用伪词和非词侧显词也存在相同的模式。我们得出的结论是,仅仅侧显字母串的存在就会导致目标词的处理深度增加。我们进一步推测,这可能是由于侧显词通过存在多个空间上不同的字母串来诱导出更“类似句子”的上下文,从而禁止使用更肤浅的决策过程,并可用于对孤立词进行词汇决策。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/39dc/8655615/2b5eacd2e443/fx1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/39dc/8655615/51e26062f4dd/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/39dc/8655615/965bfb0a2f50/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/39dc/8655615/2b5eacd2e443/fx1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/39dc/8655615/51e26062f4dd/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/39dc/8655615/965bfb0a2f50/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/39dc/8655615/2b5eacd2e443/fx1.jpg

相似文献

1
Now you see it, now you don't: Flanker presence induces the word concreteness effect.现在你看到了,现在你又看不到了:侧翼呈现诱导了词语具体性效应。
Cognition. 2022 Jan;218:104945. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104945. Epub 2021 Oct 29.
2
Lexical competition in the flankers task revisited.重新审视侧翼任务中的词汇竞争。
PLoS One. 2023 Sep 28;18(9):e0285292. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285292. eCollection 2023.
3
A Blessing in Disguise: Flanking Words Can Cancel Language Switch Costs.塞翁失马,焉知非福:侧翼词可消除语言切换成本。
J Cogn. 2024 Jan 30;7(1):20. doi: 10.5334/joc.332. eCollection 2024.
4
Concreteness norms for 1,659 French words: Relationships with other psycholinguistic variables and word recognition times.1,659 个法文字汇的具体性规范:与其他心理语言学变数及字词辨识时间的关系。
Behav Res Methods. 2018 Dec;50(6):2366-2387. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-1014-y.
5
Orthographic neighborhood and concreteness effects in the lexical decision task.词汇判断任务中的正字法邻域效应和具体性效应。
Brain Lang. 2004 Nov;91(2):252-64. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2004.03.001.
6
Parafoveal perception during sentence reading? An ERP paradigm using rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) with flankers.句子阅读过程中的旁视知觉?使用快速序列视觉呈现 (RSVP) 和侧抑制的 ERP 范式。
Psychophysiology. 2011 Apr;48(4):523-531. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01082.x. Epub 2010 Aug 18.
7
Parallel phonological processing of Chinese characters revealed by flankers tasks.侧翼任务揭示的汉字并行语音加工
Front Psychol. 2023 Oct 6;14:1239256. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1239256. eCollection 2023.
8
Revisiting the concreteness effect: Non-arbitrary mappings between form and concreteness of English words influence lexical processing.重新审视具体性效应:英语单词的形式和具体性之间的非任意映射影响词汇处理。
Cognition. 2025 Jan;254:105972. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105972. Epub 2024 Oct 9.
9
An fMRI study of concreteness effects in spoken word recognition.一项关于口语单词识别中具体性效应的功能磁共振成像研究。
Behav Brain Funct. 2014 Sep 30;10(1):34. doi: 10.1186/1744-9081-10-34.
10
Parafoveal letter-position coding in reading.阅读中副中央凹字母位置编码
Mem Cognit. 2018 May;46(4):589-599. doi: 10.3758/s13421-017-0786-0.

引用本文的文献

1
A Blessing in Disguise: Flanking Words Can Cancel Language Switch Costs.塞翁失马,焉知非福:侧翼词可消除语言切换成本。
J Cogn. 2024 Jan 30;7(1):20. doi: 10.5334/joc.332. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Semantic similarity and associated abstractness norms for 630 French word pairs.630 对法汉单词对的语义相似度及相关抽象度规范。
Behav Res Methods. 2021 Jun;53(3):1166-1178. doi: 10.3758/s13428-020-01488-z. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
2
Orthographic and phonological contributions to flanker effects.正字法和语音对侧翼效应的影响。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2020 Oct;82(7):3571-3580. doi: 10.3758/s13414-020-02023-0.
3
How readers process syntactic input depends on their goals.读者如何处理句法输入取决于他们的目标。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2020 Feb;203:103006. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103006. Epub 2020 Jan 17.
4
Power Analysis and Effect Size in Mixed Effects Models: A Tutorial.混合效应模型中的功效分析与效应量:教程
J Cogn. 2018 Jan 12;1(1):9. doi: 10.5334/joc.10.
5
Readers Are Parallel Processors.读者是并行处理器。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2019 Jul;23(7):537-546. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2019.04.006. Epub 2019 May 25.
6
How well do word recognition measures correlate? Effects of language context and repeated presentations.词识别测量的相关性如何?语言语境和重复呈现的影响。
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Dec;51(6):2800-2816. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-1158-9.
7
OB1-reader: A model of word recognition and eye movements in text reading.阅读者 OB1:一种文本阅读中单词识别和眼球运动的模型。
Psychol Rev. 2018 Nov;125(6):969-984. doi: 10.1037/rev0000119. Epub 2018 Aug 6.
8
Parallel word processing in the flanker paradigm has a rightward bias.侧翼范式中的并行文字处理存在向右的偏向。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2018 Aug;80(6):1512-1519. doi: 10.3758/s13414-018-1547-2.
9
Parallel graded attention in reading: A pupillometric study.阅读中的并行分级注意:瞳孔测量研究。
Sci Rep. 2018 Feb 27;8(1):3743. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-22138-7.
10
Concreteness norms for 1,659 French words: Relationships with other psycholinguistic variables and word recognition times.1,659 个法文字汇的具体性规范:与其他心理语言学变数及字词辨识时间的关系。
Behav Res Methods. 2018 Dec;50(6):2366-2387. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-1014-y.