Safety and efficacy of low-dose non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants versus warfarin after left atrial appendage closure with the Watchman device.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Anticoagulant therapy is suggested within 45 days after Watchman device implantation for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). A previous study demonstrated that non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) were a feasible peri- and postprocedural alternative to warfarin. The present study aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of using different anticoagulants (low-dose NOACs vs. warfarin) within 45 days after Watchman device implantation in a Chinese population.

METHODS

Patients with successful Watchman device implantation from October 2014 to June 2020 were included. All patients received anticoagulants within 45 days after the procedure, and those patients were divided into three groups according to the type of postprocedural anticoagulants. Transesophageal echocardiography follow-up was performed 45 days post procedure to assess residual flow and the occurrence of device-related thrombus (DRT).

RESULTS

A total of 368 patients were enrolled in the study. The study population was divided into three groups: the warfarin group (n = 77), the dabigatran group (n = 165) and the rivaroxaban group (n = 126). Periprocedural major bleeding was higher in the warfarin group (2.6% vs. 0% vs. 0%, P = 0.043), while minor bleeding was comparable among the groups (3.9% vs. 1.2% vs. 0.8%, P = 0.230). No periprocedural transient ischemic attack/stroke occurred. At follow-up, the incidence of DRT was higher in the warfarin group than in the other groups (4.2% vs. 0.6% vs. 0.8%; P = 0.116), but the difference was not statistically significant. The rates of thromboembolic and bleeding events were similar in the three groups.

CONCLUSION

The safety and efficacy of low-dose dabigatran and rivaroxaban were comparable to those of warfarin within 45 days after Watchman device implantation in a Chinese population.