• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

女性性别增加颈动脉内膜切除术和颈动脉支架置入术后中风和再入院的风险。

Female gender increases risk of stroke and readmission after carotid endarterectomy and carotid artery stenting.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Ill.

Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Ill.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2022 Jun;75(6):1935-1944. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.10.034. Epub 2021 Nov 2.

DOI:10.1016/j.jvs.2021.10.034
PMID:34740804
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) has historically demonstrated a higher rate of perioperative adverse events for female patients. However, recent evidence suggests similar outcomes for CEA between genders. In contrast, fewer studies have examined gender in carotid artery stenting (CAS). Using contemporary data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database, we aim to determine if gender impacts differences in postoperative complications in patients who undergo CEA or CAS.

METHODS

The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried from 2005 to 2017 using Current Procedural Terminology and International Classification of Diseases codes for retrospective review. Patients with carotid intervention (CEA or CAS) were stratified into asymptomatic vs symptomatic cohorts to determine the effect of gender on 30-day postoperative outcomes. Symptomatic patients were defined as those with perioperative transient cerebral ischemic attack or stenosis of carotid artery with cerebral infarction. Descriptive statistics were calculated. Risk-adjusted odds of 30-day postoperative outcomes were calculated using multivariate regression analysis with fixed effects for age, race, and comorbidities.

RESULTS

There were 106,568 patients with CEA or CAS (104,412 CEA and 2156 CAS). The average age was 70.9 years, and female patients accounted for 39.9% of the population. For asymptomatic patients that underwent CEA or CAS, female gender was associated with significantly higher rates of cerebrovascular accident (CVA)/stroke (13%; P = .005), readmission (10%; P = .004), bleeding complication (32%; P = .001), and urinary tract infection (54%; P = .001), as well as less infection (26%; P = .001). In the symptomatic cohort, female gender was associated with significantly higher rates of CVA/stroke (32%; P = .034), bleeding complication (203%; P = .001), and urinary tract infection (70%; P = .011), whereas female gender was associated with a lower rate of pneumonia (39%; P = .039). Subset analysis found that, compared with male patients, female patients <75 years old have an increased rate of CVA/stroke (21%; P = .001) and readmission (15%; P < .001), whereas female patients ≥75 years old did not. In asymptomatic and symptomatic patients that underwent CEA, female gender was associated with significantly higher rates of CVA/stroke (13%; P = .006 and 31%; P = .044, respectively), but this finding was not present in patients undergoing CAS.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients undergoing carotid intervention, female gender was associated with significantly increased rates of postoperative CVA/stroke in the asymptomatic and symptomatic cohorts as well as readmission in the asymptomatic cohort. Female gender was associated with higher rates of CVA/stroke following CEA, but not CAS. We recommend that randomized control trials ensure adequate representation of female patients to better understand gender-based disparities in carotid intervention.

摘要

目的

颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)历史上显示女性患者围手术期不良事件发生率较高。然而,最近的证据表明,性别对 CEA 之间的结果相似。相比之下,研究较少探讨颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)中的性别问题。本研究使用美国外科医师学院国家手术质量改进计划数据库中的当代数据,旨在确定性别是否会影响接受 CEA 或 CAS 的患者术后并发症的差异。

方法

使用当前手术程序术语和国际疾病分类代码,从 2005 年至 2017 年,对美国外科医师学院国家手术质量改进计划数据库进行了回顾性查询。将接受颈动脉介入治疗(CEA 或 CAS)的患者分为无症状与有症状队列,以确定性别对 30 天术后结局的影响。有症状的患者定义为围手术期短暂性脑缺血发作或伴有脑梗死的颈动脉狭窄。计算描述性统计数据。使用多元回归分析,结合年龄、种族和合并症的固定效应,计算 30 天术后结局的风险调整比值比。

结果

共有 106568 例 CEA 或 CAS 患者(104412 例 CEA 和 2156 例 CAS)。平均年龄为 70.9 岁,女性患者占总人口的 39.9%。对于接受 CEA 或 CAS 的无症状患者,女性性别与更高的脑血管意外(CVA)/中风率(13%;P=0.005)、再入院率(10%;P=0.004)、出血并发症(32%;P=0.001)和尿路感染(54%;P=0.001)显著相关,而感染率(26%;P=0.001)较低。在有症状的队列中,女性性别与更高的 CVA/中风率(32%;P=0.034)、出血并发症(203%;P=0.001)和尿路感染(70%;P=0.011)显著相关,而女性性别与肺炎率较低(39%;P=0.039)相关。亚组分析发现,与男性患者相比,年龄<75 岁的女性患者 CVA/中风(21%;P=0.001)和再入院率(15%;P<0.001)较高,而年龄≥75 岁的女性患者则没有。在接受 CEA 的无症状和有症状患者中,女性性别与更高的 CVA/中风率(13%;P=0.006 和 31%;P=0.044)相关,但在接受 CAS 的患者中没有发现这种关联。

结论

在接受颈动脉介入治疗的患者中,女性性别与无症状和有症状队列中的术后 CVA/中风以及无症状队列中的再入院率显著增加相关。女性性别与 CEA 后 CVA/中风的发生率增加有关,但与 CAS 无关。我们建议随机对照试验确保女性患者有足够的代表性,以更好地了解颈动脉介入治疗中的性别差异。

相似文献

1
Female gender increases risk of stroke and readmission after carotid endarterectomy and carotid artery stenting.女性性别增加颈动脉内膜切除术和颈动脉支架置入术后中风和再入院的风险。
J Vasc Surg. 2022 Jun;75(6):1935-1944. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.10.034. Epub 2021 Nov 2.
2
Preoperative Dependent Functional Status Is Associated With Poor Outcomes After Carotid Endarterectomy and Carotid Stenting in Both Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Patients.术前依赖性功能状态与症状性和无症状性患者颈动脉内膜切除术和颈动脉支架置入术后的不良结局相关。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2021 Oct;76:114-127. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2021.04.027. Epub 2021 May 15.
3
Predictors of poor outcome after carotid intervention.颈动脉介入术后不良预后的预测因素。
J Vasc Surg. 2016 Sep;64(3):663-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.03.428. Epub 2016 May 18.
4
Impact of frailty on 30-day death, stroke, or myocardial infarction in severe carotid stenosis: Endarterectomy versus stenting.严重颈动脉狭窄患者中衰弱对 30 天内死亡、卒中和心肌梗死的影响:颈动脉内膜切除术与支架置入术的比较。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2022 Nov;222:107469. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2022.107469. Epub 2022 Oct 8.
5
Stroke and death after carotid endarterectomy and carotid artery stenting with and without high risk criteria.颈动脉内膜切除术和颈动脉支架置入术治疗伴有和不伴有高危标准的中风和死亡。
J Vasc Surg. 2010 Dec;52(6):1497-504. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.06.174. Epub 2010 Sep 22.
6
Carotid endarterectomy was performed with lower stroke and death rates than carotid artery stenting in the United States in 2003 and 2004.2003年和2004年在美国,颈动脉内膜切除术的实施带来的中风和死亡率低于颈动脉支架置入术。
J Vasc Surg. 2007 Dec;46(6):1112-1118. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.08.030.
7
Carotid revascularization outcomes comparing distal filters, flow reversal, and endarterectomy.比较远端滤器、血流逆转和内膜切除术的颈动脉血运重建结果。
J Vasc Surg. 2011 Oct;54(4):1000-4; discussion 1004-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.03.279. Epub 2011 Aug 25.
8
Risk of intracranial hemorrhage after carotid artery stenting versus endarterectomy: a population-based study.颈动脉支架置入术与颈动脉内膜切除术治疗后颅内出血风险的比较:一项基于人群的研究。
J Neurosurg. 2018 Dec 1;129(6):1522-1529. doi: 10.3171/2017.8.JNS171142. Epub 2018 Jan 26.
9
Comparison of 30-day readmission rates and risk factors between carotid artery stenting and endarterectomy.颈动脉支架置入术与动脉内膜切除术的30天再入院率及危险因素比较。
J Vasc Surg. 2017 Nov;66(5):1432-1444.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.05.097. Epub 2017 Aug 31.
10
Differential outcomes of carotid stenting and endarterectomy performed exclusively by vascular surgeons in the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stenting Trial (CREST).颈动脉内膜切除术与血管外科医生实施的颈动脉支架置入术的疗效差异:颈动脉血运重建内膜切除术与支架置入术试验(CREST)。
J Vasc Surg. 2013 Feb;57(2):303-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.09.014. Epub 2012 Dec 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Management and Treatment of Carotid Stenosis: Overview of Therapeutic Possibilities and Comparison Between Interventional Radiology, Surgery and Hybrid Procedure.颈动脉狭窄的管理与治疗:治疗选择概述及介入放射学、外科手术与杂交手术的比较
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Jul 1;15(13):1679. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15131679.
2
The impact of stenosis treatment on the hemodynamic crosstalk between carotid arteries.狭窄治疗对颈动脉之间血流动力学串扰的影响。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 1;15(1):20442. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-05466-3.
3
Risk factors analysis and nomograph model construction of unplanned readmission for ischemic stroke within 31 days in Wenzhou.
温州市缺血性脑卒中31天内非计划再入院的危险因素分析及列线图模型构建
Front Neurol. 2025 Mar 27;16:1499564. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1499564. eCollection 2025.
4
Sex as a Predictor of Outcomes for Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis: A Comparative Analysis between CAS and CEA.性别作为有症状颈动脉狭窄预后的预测因素:颈动脉支架置入术与颈动脉内膜切除术的比较分析
J Pers Med. 2024 Aug 5;14(8):830. doi: 10.3390/jpm14080830.
5
Sex-Related Differences in Proximal Neck Anatomy and Their Consequences in Patients after EVAR: A Matched Cohort Analysis.腔内修复术后患者近端颈部解剖结构的性别差异及其影响:一项匹配队列分析
J Clin Med. 2023 Jul 27;12(15):4929. doi: 10.3390/jcm12154929.
6
Females are less likely to receive best medical therapy for stroke prevention before and after carotid revascularization than males.女性在颈动脉血运重建术前后接受最佳卒中预防治疗的可能性低于男性。
J Vasc Surg. 2023 Mar;77(3):786-794.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.09.028. Epub 2022 Oct 12.
7
Differences in Stroke or Systemic Thromboembolism Readmission Risk After Hospitalization for Atrial Fibrillation and Atrial Flutter.心房颤动和心房扑动住院后中风或全身性血栓栓塞再入院风险的差异。
Cureus. 2022 Apr 5;14(4):e23844. doi: 10.7759/cureus.23844. eCollection 2022 Apr.