• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

狭窄治疗对颈动脉之间血流动力学串扰的影响。

The impact of stenosis treatment on the hemodynamic crosstalk between carotid arteries.

作者信息

Ceserani Valentina, Conti Michele, Curcio Nicoletta, Secchi Francesco, Baroni Irene, Bari Vlasta, Righini Paolo, Nano Giovanni, Mazzaccaro Daniela

机构信息

Department of Civil Engineering and Architecture, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.

3D and Computer Simulation Laboratory, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 1;15(1):20442. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-05466-3.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-025-05466-3
PMID:40594497
Abstract

Biomechanical analysis of crosstalk between the carotids remains poorly underexplored. This study aims to clarify the impact of severe carotid stenosis on the local hemodynamics of the opposite carotid artery, before and after treatment. Data from patients diagnosed with severe internal carotid artery stenosis (≥ 70%), treated with carotid artery stenting (CAS) or carotid endarterectomy (CEA) were analyzed. Both sides' anatomical and hemodynamic remodeling parameters were evaluated before and after treatment. Forty-two patients underwent computed tomography angiography (CTA) and phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging (PC-MRI) to measure carotid diameters and flow rates in the common, internal, and external carotids (CCA, ICA, and ECA, respectively) before and after CAS or CEA. Additionally, patient-specific computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations were performed to calculate time-averaged wall shear stress (taWSS) before and after the treatment. Post-treatment analysis revealed anatomical and hemodynamic changes in the contralateral side. Specifically, there was a decrease in blood flow and an increase in vessel diameters, particularly in the CCA, of patients who had undergone CEA (pre vs. post: flow p = .029, diameter p = .007). Additionally, there was an increase in low taWSS areas in the SOI after the operation: CEA from 15.50 (10.80) % to 18.00 (20.25) %, CAS from 17.00 (15.55) % to 19.50 (20.50) %. The study revealed new anatomical and hemodynamic parameters changes in both carotids, offering insights into the interaction between stenotic and contralateral carotid arteries in post-operative conditions.

摘要

颈动脉之间串扰的生物力学分析仍未得到充分探索。本研究旨在阐明重度颈动脉狭窄对治疗前后对侧颈动脉局部血流动力学的影响。分析了诊断为重度颈内动脉狭窄(≥70%)并接受颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)或颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)治疗的患者的数据。评估了治疗前后两侧的解剖和血流动力学重塑参数。42例患者在CAS或CEA治疗前后接受了计算机断层血管造影(CTA)和相位对比磁共振成像(PC-MRI),以测量颈总动脉、颈内动脉和颈外动脉(分别为CCA、ICA和ECA)的直径和流速。此外,还进行了患者特异性计算流体动力学(CFD)模拟,以计算治疗前后的时间平均壁面剪应力(taWSS)。治疗后分析揭示了对侧的解剖和血流动力学变化。具体而言,接受CEA治疗的患者血流量减少,血管直径增加,尤其是在CCA中(术前与术后:血流量p = 0.029,直径p = 0.007)。此外,术后SOI中低taWSS区域增加:CEA从15.50(10.80)%增加到18.00(20.25)%,CAS从17.00(15.55)%增加到19.50(20.50)%。该研究揭示了双侧颈动脉新的解剖和血流动力学参数变化,为术后狭窄颈动脉与对侧颈动脉之间的相互作用提供了见解。

相似文献

1
The impact of stenosis treatment on the hemodynamic crosstalk between carotid arteries.狭窄治疗对颈动脉之间血流动力学串扰的影响。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 1;15(1):20442. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-05466-3.
2
Comparison of 4D flow MRI and computational fluid dynamics in carotid models with different stenosis levels.不同狭窄程度颈动脉模型中四维血流磁共振成像与计算流体动力学的比较。
Comput Biol Med. 2025 Aug;194:110405. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.110405. Epub 2025 Jun 10.
3
Duplex ultrasound for diagnosing symptomatic carotid stenosis in the extracranial segments.双功能超声用于诊断颅外段有症状颈动脉狭窄。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 11;7(7):CD013172. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013172.pub2.
4
Sex differences in outcome after carotid revascularization in symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis.症状性和无症状性颈动脉狭窄患者颈动脉血运重建术后结局的性别差异。
J Vasc Surg. 2023 Sep;78(3):817-827.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.03.502. Epub 2023 Apr 11.
5
Carotid endarterectomy is less expensive than transcarotid artery revascularization.颈动脉内膜切除术比经颈动脉血管重建术费用更低。
J Vasc Surg. 2025 Jul;82(1):136-145.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2025.03.192. Epub 2025 Mar 25.
6
Anatomical and technical factors associated with stroke or death during carotid angioplasty and stenting: results from the endarterectomy versus angioplasty in patients with symptomatic severe carotid stenosis (EVA-3S) trial and systematic review.与颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入术期间发生中风或死亡相关的解剖学和技术因素:症状性严重颈动脉狭窄患者颈动脉内膜切除术与血管成形术(EVA-3S)试验和系统评价的结果。
Stroke. 2011 Feb;42(2):380-8. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.588772. Epub 2010 Dec 23.
7
Carotid Artery Stenting Versus Carotid Endarterectomy for Treatment of Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis.颈动脉支架置入术与颈动脉内膜切除术治疗无症状性颈动脉狭窄的比较
Int Heart J. 2018 May 30;59(3):550-558. doi: 10.1536/ihj.17-312. Epub 2018 May 20.
8
Newly developed DWI hyperintensities and changes in cerebral blood flow after carotid stent placement for unilateral symptomatic carotid artery stenosis.单侧症状性颈动脉狭窄行颈动脉支架置入术后新出现的弥散加权成像高信号及脑血流变化
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Jan 17;104(3):e41153. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000041153.
9
Patient-specific computational fluid hemodynamics in the ascending aorta before and after thoracic endovascular repair.胸主动脉腔内修复术前及术后升主动脉的个体化计算流体血液动力学
Comput Biol Med. 2025 Aug;194:110493. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.110493. Epub 2025 Jun 3.
10
Updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing carotid artery stenting and carotid endarterectomy in the treatment of carotid stenosis.比较颈动脉支架置入术与颈动脉内膜切除术治疗颈动脉狭窄的随机临床试验的最新系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2012 May;26(4):576-90. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2011.09.009. Epub 2012 Mar 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Lesion patterns and mechanism analysis of acute contralateral ischemic stroke accompanying stenosis of unilateral extracranial internal carotid artery.单侧颅外颈内动脉狭窄伴发急性对侧缺血性脑卒中的病灶模式和机制分析。
Brain Behav. 2023 Sep;13(9):e3111. doi: 10.1002/brb3.3111. Epub 2023 Jun 7.
2
Editor's Choice - European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2023 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Atherosclerotic Carotid and Vertebral Artery Disease.编辑推荐——欧洲血管外科学会(ESVS)2023年动脉粥样硬化性颈动脉和椎动脉疾病管理临床实践指南
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2023 Jan;65(1):7-111. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2022.04.011. Epub 2022 May 20.
3
Female gender increases risk of stroke and readmission after carotid endarterectomy and carotid artery stenting.
女性性别增加颈动脉内膜切除术和颈动脉支架置入术后中风和再入院的风险。
J Vasc Surg. 2022 Jun;75(6):1935-1944. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.10.034. Epub 2021 Nov 2.
4
Carotid Phase-Contrast Magnetic Resonance before Treatment: 4D-Flow versus Standard 2D Imaging.治疗前颈动脉相位对比磁共振:4D-Flow 与标准 2D 成像。
Tomography. 2021 Sep 28;7(4):513-522. doi: 10.3390/tomography7040044.
5
Could Gender Impact on Immediate and Long-term Carotid Artery Stenting Outcome? Insight from an Italian Single Center Experience.性别是否会影响颈动脉支架置入术的即刻和长期结果?来自意大利单中心经验的见解。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2021 Oct;76:342-350. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2021.04.014. Epub 2021 May 2.
6
Simulation of Blood as Fluid: A Review From Rheological Aspects.血液的流体模拟:流变学角度的综述。
IEEE Rev Biomed Eng. 2021;14:327-341. doi: 10.1109/RBME.2020.3011182. Epub 2021 Jan 22.
7
Prediction of Long Term Restenosis Risk After Surgery in the Carotid Bifurcation by Hemodynamic and Geometric Analysis.通过血流动力学和几何分析预测颈动脉分叉手术后的长期再狭窄风险。
Ann Biomed Eng. 2019 Apr;47(4):1129-1140. doi: 10.1007/s10439-019-02201-8. Epub 2019 Jan 18.
8
A comparison of 4D flow MRI-derived wall shear stress with computational fluid dynamics methods for intracranial aneurysms and carotid bifurcations - A review.用于颅内动脉瘤和颈动脉分叉的基于4D流磁共振成像的壁面剪应力与计算流体动力学方法的比较——综述
Magn Reson Imaging. 2018 May;48:62-69. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2017.12.005. Epub 2017 Dec 6.
9
Relation between wall shear stress and carotid artery wall thickening MRI versus CFD.壁面剪应力与颈动脉壁增厚之间的关系:磁共振成像与计算流体动力学对比
J Biomech. 2016 Mar 21;49(5):735-741. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.02.004. Epub 2016 Feb 10.
10
An insight into the mechanistic role of the common carotid artery on the hemodynamics at the carotid bifurcation.深入了解颈总动脉在颈动脉分叉处血流动力学中的机制作用。
Ann Biomed Eng. 2015 Jan;43(1):68-81. doi: 10.1007/s10439-014-1119-0. Epub 2014 Sep 19.