• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
An empirical analysis of the impact of income inequality and social capital on physical and mental health - take China's micro-database analysis as an example.收入不平等和社会资本对身心健康影响的实证分析——以中国微观数据库为例。
Int J Equity Health. 2021 Nov 6;20(1):241. doi: 10.1186/s12939-021-01560-w.
2
Can government subsidies and public mechanisms alleviate the physical and mental health vulnerability of China's urban and rural residents?政府补贴和公共机制能否缓解中国城乡居民的身心健康脆弱性?
Int J Equity Health. 2023 Apr 1;22(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s12939-022-01805-2.
3
Does social capital buffer or exacerbate mental health inequality? Evidence from the China Family Panel Study (CFPS).社会资本是否缓冲或加剧心理健康不平等?来自中国家庭追踪调查(CFPS)的证据。
Int J Equity Health. 2022 May 23;21(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s12939-022-01642-3.
4
Social Capital and the Realization of Mutual Assistance for the Elderly in Rural Areas-Based on the Intermediary Role of Psychological Capital.社会资本与农村老年人互助养老实现——基于心理资本的中介作用
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 27;20(1):415. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20010415.
5
Income Inequality, Neighbourhood Social Capital and Subjective Well-Being in China: Exploration of a Moderating Effect.收入不平等、邻里社会资本与中国主观幸福感:调节效应的探索
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 24;18(13):6799. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18136799.
6
Mental health inequality between urban and rural youth under COVID-19 from survey data from China.新冠疫情下中国城乡青年心理健康不平等:基于调查数据的研究。
Front Public Health. 2024 May 17;12:1389765. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1389765. eCollection 2024.
7
The role of neighborhood social capital on health and health inequality in rural and urban China.邻里社会资本对中国城乡健康和健康不平等的作用。
Prev Med. 2022 Mar;156:106989. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2022.106989. Epub 2022 Feb 9.
8
Income inequality, social capital and self-rated health and dental status in older Japanese.日本老年人的收入不平等、社会资本与自评健康和口腔健康状况。
Soc Sci Med. 2011 Nov;73(10):1561-8. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.09.005. Epub 2011 Sep 29.
9
Social capital, income inequality and the social gradient in self-rated health in Latin America: A fixed effects analysis.社会资本、收入不平等与拉丁美洲自评健康的社会梯度:固定效应分析。
Soc Sci Med. 2018 Jan;196:115-122. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.11.025. Epub 2017 Nov 20.
10
Social Integration as Mediator and Age as Moderator in Social Capital Affecting Mental Health of Internal Migrant Workers: A Multi-Group Structural Equation Modeling Approach.社会融合在社会资本对内部流动工人心理健康影响中的中介作用和年龄的调节作用:多群组结构方程模型方法。
Front Public Health. 2022 May 12;10:865061. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.865061. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
Income inequality and multimorbidity patterns in China: a micro-level analysis using CHARLS.中国的收入不平等与多种疾病并存模式:基于中国健康与养老追踪调查(CHARLS)的微观层面分析
Front Public Health. 2025 Apr 16;13:1588325. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1588325. eCollection 2025.
2
The impact of digital social capital on the health of older adults: A moderated mediation effect test.数字社会资本对老年人健康的影响:一项有调节的中介效应检验。
Digit Health. 2024 May 9;10:20552076241253095. doi: 10.1177/20552076241253095. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
3
Health inequalities for China's low-income population: trends, subgroup differences, and influencing factors, 2010-2022.2010 - 2022年中国低收入人群的健康不平等:趋势、亚组差异及影响因素
Front Public Health. 2025 Apr 10;13:1569726. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1569726. eCollection 2025.
4
Deciphering the mechanism of women's mental health: a perspective of urban-rural differences.解读女性心理健康机制:城乡差异视角
Front Public Health. 2025 Mar 5;13:1545640. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1545640. eCollection 2025.
5
Study protocol: A national cross-sectional study on psychology and behavior investigation of Chinese residents in 2023.研究方案:2023年中国居民心理与行为调查的全国性横断面研究。
Health Care Sci. 2024 Dec 20;3(6):475-492. doi: 10.1002/hcs2.125. eCollection 2024 Dec.
6
Will wealth inequality decrease happiness?-Empirical evidence from China.财富不平等会降低幸福感吗?——来自中国的实证证据。
Front Psychol. 2024 Feb 1;14:1259456. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1259456. eCollection 2023.
7
The impact of household wealth gap on individual's mental health.家庭财富差距对个人心理健康的影响。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Oct 6;23(1):1936. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16871-6.
8
The buffering effect of social capital for daily mental stress in an unequal society: a lesson from Seoul.在一个不平等的社会中,社会资本对日常精神压力的缓冲作用:来自首尔的教训。
Int J Equity Health. 2023 Apr 10;22(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12939-023-01875-w.
9
Can government subsidies and public mechanisms alleviate the physical and mental health vulnerability of China's urban and rural residents?政府补贴和公共机制能否缓解中国城乡居民的身心健康脆弱性?
Int J Equity Health. 2023 Apr 1;22(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s12939-022-01805-2.
10
Knowledge mapping of population health: A bibliometric analysis.人群健康知识图谱:一项文献计量分析。
Heliyon. 2022 Dec;8(12):e12181. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12181. Epub 2022 Dec 9.

本文引用的文献

1
Cumulative socio-economic disadvantage and traumatic dental injuries during adolescence.青少年时期累积的社会经济劣势与创伤性牙外伤。
Dent Traumatol. 2021 Apr;37(2):338-344. doi: 10.1111/edt.12634. Epub 2020 Dec 4.
2
Complexity and bias in cross-sectional data with binary disease outcome in observational studies.观察性研究中具有二元疾病结局的横断面数据的复杂性和偏倚。
Stat Med. 2021 Feb 20;40(4):950-962. doi: 10.1002/sim.8812. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
3
Recent quantitative research on determinants of health in high income countries: A scoping review.近期高收入国家健康决定因素的定量研究:范围综述。
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 17;15(9):e0239031. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239031. eCollection 2020.
4
An Exposure-Wide and Mendelian Randomization Approach to Identifying Modifiable Factors for the Prevention of Depression.一种用于识别可预防抑郁症的可调节因素的广泛暴露和孟德尔随机化方法。
Am J Psychiatry. 2020 Oct 1;177(10):944-954. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2020.19111158. Epub 2020 Aug 14.
5
Economic growth, income inequality and life expectancy in China.中国的经济增长、收入不平等与预期寿命。
Soc Sci Med. 2020 Jul;256:113046. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113046. Epub 2020 May 13.
6
Widening income inequalities in life expectancy? Analysing time trends based on German health insurance data.预期寿命方面的收入不平等扩大?基于德国健康保险数据的时间趋势分析。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2020 Jun;74(7):592-597. doi: 10.1136/jech-2019-212966. Epub 2020 Apr 10.
7
Inequalities in Poverty and Income between Single Mothers and Fathers.单亲母亲与父亲之间的贫困和收入不平等。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Dec 24;17(1):135. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17010135.
8
Contextual income inequality and adolescents' oral-health-related quality of life: A multi-level analysis.语境收入不平等与青少年口腔健康相关生活质量:多层次分析。
Int Dent J. 2019 Dec;69(6):463-471. doi: 10.1111/idj.12504. Epub 2019 Jul 6.
9
Revisiting the Income Inequality Hypothesis With 292 OECD Regional Units.重新审视经 292 个经合组织区域单位修正的收入不平等假说。
Int J Health Serv. 2019 Apr;49(2):360-370. doi: 10.1177/0020731418814105. Epub 2019 Jan 7.
10
Reconsidering the income-health relationship using distributional regression.使用分布回归重新考虑收入与健康的关系。
Health Econ. 2018 Jul;27(7):1074-1088. doi: 10.1002/hec.3656. Epub 2018 Apr 19.

收入不平等和社会资本对身心健康影响的实证分析——以中国微观数据库为例。

An empirical analysis of the impact of income inequality and social capital on physical and mental health - take China's micro-database analysis as an example.

机构信息

School of Management, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, 212002, Jiangsu, China.

School of Economics and Management, Jiangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanchang, 330000, Jiangxi, China.

出版信息

Int J Equity Health. 2021 Nov 6;20(1):241. doi: 10.1186/s12939-021-01560-w.

DOI:10.1186/s12939-021-01560-w
PMID:34742299
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8571851/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Income inequality is one of the important reflections of the unbalanced development of the world economy and can have adverse effects on physical and mental health.

METHODS

This article used the 2018 China Family Panel Studies Database as an empirical analysis data source. The Kakwani index (KI) was used to measure income inequality, and social capital was broken into cognitive social capital and structural social capital. Our assessment was conducted by using STATA16 software for ordered logistic regression, verifying income inequality, social capital on correlation between physical and mental health firstly; then by gradual regression methods to verify intermediary effect, and demonstrate the social capital as an intermediary variable affecting physical and mental health as income inequality.

RESULT

The income inequality has a significant negative effect on physical and mental health (β = - 0.964, - 0.381; OR = 0.382, 0.758; P < 0.01), Social capital has a significant effect on physical and mental health (Cognitive SC(MH): β = 0.146 and 0.104, OR = 1.157 and 1.110, P < 0.01; Cognitive SC(PH): β = 0.046 and 0.069, OR = 1.047 and 1.071, P < 0.01; Structural SC(MH): β = - 0.005, 0.025 and 0.015, OR = 0.995, 1.025 and 1.015, P > 0.1, P < 0.01 and P < 0.01; Structural SC(PH): β = - 0.026, 0.009 and - 0.013, OR = 0.975, 1.009 and 0.987, P < 0.01, P > 0.1 and P < 0.01). Our analysis also showed that social capital (cognitive social capital and structural social capital) has an intermediary effect on physical and mental health due to income inequality.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that income inequality can not only directly affect physical and mental health, but also through social capital intermediary utility indirectly affect physical and mental health, social capital has positive effects on physical and mental health. At the same time, income inequality and social capital's effects on physical and mental health exist regional differences, urban-rural differences, and gender differences. Therefore, in the development of special policies to support and take care of vulnerable groups, special attention needs to be paid to poor rural areas and female groups.

摘要

背景

收入不平等是世界经济发展不平衡的重要反映之一,会对身心健康产生不利影响。

方法

本文使用 2018 年中国家庭追踪调查数据库作为实证分析数据来源。使用卡卡文指数(KI)衡量收入不平等,将社会资本分为认知社会资本和结构社会资本。我们使用 STATA16 软件进行有序逻辑回归评估,首先检验收入不平等、社会资本与身心健康之间的相关性;然后通过逐步回归方法验证中介效应,证明社会资本作为收入不平等影响身心健康的中介变量。

结果

收入不平等对身心健康有显著的负向影响(β=-0.964,-0.381;OR=0.382,0.758;P<0.01),社会资本对身心健康有显著影响(认知社会资本(MH):β=0.146 和 0.104,OR=1.157 和 1.110,P<0.01;认知社会资本(PH):β=0.046 和 0.069,OR=1.047 和 1.071,P<0.01;结构社会资本(MH):β=-0.005,0.025 和 0.015,OR=0.995,1.025 和 1.015,P>0.1,P<0.01 和 P<0.01;结构社会资本(PH):β=-0.026,0.009 和-0.013,OR=0.975,1.009 和 0.987,P<0.01,P>0.1 和 P<0.01)。我们的分析还表明,由于收入不平等,社会资本(认知社会资本和结构社会资本)对身心健康具有中介效应。

结论

本研究表明,收入不平等不仅可以直接影响身心健康,还可以通过社会资本的中介效用间接影响身心健康,社会资本对身心健康具有积极影响。同时,收入不平等和社会资本对身心健康的影响存在区域差异、城乡差异和性别差异。因此,在制定支持和照顾弱势群体的特殊政策时,需要特别关注贫困农村地区和女性群体。