Dong Jun, Shen Lingfang, Shan Shengdao, Liu Wanpeng, Qi Zhifu, Liu Chunhong, Gao Xiang
State Key Laboratory of Clean Energy Utilization, Zhejiang University, 310027 Hangzhou, China; Zhejiang Energy R&D Institute Co., Ltd., 311121 Hangzhou, China; Key Laboratory of Energy Conservation & Pollutant Control Technology for Thermal Power of Zhejiang Province, 311121 Hangzhou, China.
Key Laboratory of Recycling and Eco-treatment of Waste Biomass of Zhejiang Province, Zhejiang University of Science and Technology, 310023 Hangzhou, China.
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Feb 1;806(Pt 4):151442. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151442. Epub 2021 Nov 4.
Recoverable magnetic biochar has great potential for treating wastewater contaminants such as Pb(II). However, whether magnetic modification could enhance metal adsorption efficiency is currently contradictory in the literature mainly due to the differences in selecting various magnetic functionalization conditions. Considering this gap in knowledge, the effects of magnetic functionalization method (impregnation and precipitation), concentration of precursor iron solution (0.01-1 M), and pyrolysis temperature (300-700 °C) on the characteristics and Pb(II) adsorption capacity of biochar were systematically investigated in this paper. Results indicated that FeO was the main product for magnetic biochars synthesized using the impregnation (denoted as FWFe(3)) and precipitation methods (denoted as FWFe(2)). Magnetic functionalization resulted in remarkably increased pH and more negative zeta potential for FWFe(2) samples, whereas FWFe(3) samples showed the opposite trends. The adsorption of Pb(II) on different biochars fitted the pseudo-second order model and the Langmuir model. The maximum adsorption capacity was 817.64 mg/g for FWFe(2)1M700C (precipitation by 1 M of Fe(II)/Fe(III), pyrolysis at 700 °C), outperforming FWFe(3) and pristine biochar samples by around 5-13 times. Mechanism study indicated that the adsorption mainly involved electrostatic attraction, ion exchange, co-precipitation, and complexation. Pb(II) adsorption capacity was strongly dependent on the alkali pH of biochar. However, this efficiency was less affected by biochar surface area and its morphology. The higher pH of FWFe(2) samples not only led to an increased surface charge for stronger electrostatic attraction and ion exchange but also favored the formation of co-precipitates. By contrast, FWFe(3) samples showed a decreased adsorption capacity for Pb(II) with increased concentration of embedded iron. Overall, magnetic biochar, prepared using precipitation followed by high-temperature pyrolysis (such as, FWFe(2)1M700C), can be a promising adsorbent for Pb(II) adsorption from wastewater.
可回收磁性生物炭在处理含铅(II)等废水污染物方面具有巨大潜力。然而,磁性改性是否能提高金属吸附效率,目前文献中的观点相互矛盾,这主要是由于选择各种磁性功能化条件存在差异。考虑到这一知识空白,本文系统研究了磁性功能化方法(浸渍法和沉淀法)、前驱体铁溶液浓度(0.01 - 1 M)以及热解温度(300 - 700 °C)对生物炭特性及铅(II)吸附容量的影响。结果表明,FeO是采用浸渍法(记为FWFe(3))和沉淀法(记为FWFe(2))合成的磁性生物炭的主要产物。磁性功能化使FWFe(2)样品的pH值显著升高,zeta电位更负,而FWFe(3)样品呈现相反趋势。不同生物炭对铅(II)的吸附符合准二级动力学模型和朗缪尔模型。FWFe(2)1M700C(1 M铁(II)/铁(III)沉淀,700 °C热解)的最大吸附容量为817.64 mg/g,比FWFe(3)和原始生物炭样品高出约5 - 13倍。机理研究表明,吸附主要涉及静电吸引、离子交换、共沉淀和络合作用。铅(II)吸附容量强烈依赖于生物炭的碱性pH值。然而,这种效率受生物炭表面积及其形态的影响较小。FWFe(2)样品较高的pH值不仅导致表面电荷增加,从而增强静电吸引和离子交换,还有利于共沉淀的形成。相比之下,FWFe(3)样品对铅(II)的吸附容量随嵌入铁浓度的增加而降低。总体而言,采用沉淀法后高温热解制备的磁性生物炭(如FWFe(2)1M700C)有望成为废水中铅(II)吸附的优良吸附剂。