Kifle Fitsum, Boru Yared, Tamiru Hailu Dhufera, Sultan Menbeu, Walelign Yenegeta, Demelash Azeb, Beane Abigail, Haniffa Rashan, Gebreyesus Alegnta, Moore Jolene
From the College of Medicine, Department of Anesthesia, Debre Birhan University, Debre Birhan, Amhara, Ethiopia.
Network for Perioperative and Critical Care (N4PCc), Ethiopia.
Anesth Analg. 2022 May 1;134(5):930-937. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000005799.
The burden of critical illness in low-income countries is high and expected to rise. This has implications for wider public health measures including maternal mortality, deaths from communicable diseases, and the global burden of disease related to injury. There is a paucity of data pertaining to the provision of critical care in low-income countries. This study provides a review of critical care services in Ethiopia.
Multicenter structured onsite surveys incorporating face-to-face interviews, narrative discussions, and on-site assessment were conducted at intensive care units (ICUs) in September 2020 to ascertain structure, organization, workforce, resources, and service capacity. The 12 recommended variables and classification criteria of the World Federation of Societies of Intensive and Critical Care Medicine (WFSICCM) taskforce criteria were utilized to provide an overview of service and service classification.
A total of 51 of 53 (96%) ICUs were included, representing 324 beds, for a population of 114 million; this corresponds to approximately 0.3 public ICU beds per 100,000 population. Services were concentrated in the capital Addis Ababa with 25% of bed capacity and 51% of critical care physicians. No ICU had piped oxygen. Only 33% (106) beds had all of the 3 basic recommended noninvasive monitoring devices (sphygmomanometer, pulse oximetry, and electrocardiography). There was limited capacity for ventilation (n = 189; 58%), invasive monitoring (n = 9; 3%), and renal dialysis (n = 4; 8%). Infection prevention and control strategies were lacking.
This study highlights major deficiencies in quantity, distribution, organization, and provision of intensive care in Ethiopia. Improvement efforts led by the Ministry of Health with input from the acute care workforce are an urgent priority.
低收入国家危重病负担沉重且预计还会上升。这对包括孕产妇死亡率、传染病死亡以及与伤害相关的全球疾病负担等更广泛的公共卫生措施产生影响。关于低收入国家提供重症监护的数据匮乏。本研究对埃塞俄比亚的重症监护服务进行了综述。
2020年9月在重症监护病房(ICU)开展了多中心结构化现场调查,包括面对面访谈、叙述性讨论和现场评估,以确定结构、组织、人员、资源和服务能力。利用世界重症与危重症医学联合会(WFSICCM)工作组标准推荐的12个变量和分类标准来概述服务及服务分类。
53个ICU中有51个(96%)被纳入研究,共有324张床位,服务于1.14亿人口;这相当于每10万人口约有0.3张公共ICU床位。服务集中在首都亚的斯亚贝巴,占床位容量的25%,重症监护医生的51%。没有ICU配备管道氧气。只有33%(106张)床位配备了所有3种基本推荐的非侵入性监测设备(血压计、脉搏血氧仪和心电图仪)。通气能力(n = 189;58%)、侵入性监测能力(n = 9;3%)和肾透析能力(n = 4;8%)有限。缺乏感染预防和控制策略。
本研究突出了埃塞俄比亚在重症监护的数量、分布、组织和提供方面的主要不足。由卫生部牵头并在急性护理工作人员的参与下进行改进工作是当务之急。