• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国量化宽松政策与印度债券市场

US QE and the Indian Bond Market.

作者信息

Paul Moumita, Reddy Kalluru Siva

机构信息

Institute of Politics and Economics, Pune, 411 004 India.

出版信息

J Quant Econ. 2022;20(1):137-157. doi: 10.1007/s40953-021-00257-9. Epub 2021 Oct 30.

DOI:10.1007/s40953-021-00257-9
PMID:34744335
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8556800/
Abstract

This paper examines the long- and short-run spillover effects of US quantitative easing (QE) on the benchmark 10-year Indian government bond (IGB) yield by Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) bounds testing co-integration approach using monthly data from September 2008 to June 2019. The results show that a 10%-point rise in US QE led to a 4 bp rise in yields. The counterfactual analysis shows that volatility of the yields would have been less without the QE. During the episodes of QE, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) had to alter its policy rate and engage in open-market operations (OMOs) to simultaneously maintain liquidity in the system and reduce the volatility of interest rates. Spillover on the debt yield leads to mispricing of assets and partial loss of the monetary-policy autonomy of the RBI.

摘要

本文采用自回归分布滞后(ARDL)边界检验协整方法,利用2008年9月至2019年6月的月度数据,研究了美国量化宽松(QE)对印度10年期基准国债(IGB)收益率的长期和短期溢出效应。结果表明,美国量化宽松上升10个百分点会导致收益率上升4个基点。反事实分析表明,如果没有量化宽松,收益率的波动性会更小。在量化宽松期间,印度储备银行(RBI)不得不调整其政策利率并进行公开市场操作(OMO),以同时维持系统流动性并降低利率波动性。债务收益率的溢出导致资产定价错误以及印度储备银行货币政策自主性的部分丧失。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a768/8556800/eac2ccdda98c/40953_2021_257_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a768/8556800/8889fb9a8cd8/40953_2021_257_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a768/8556800/aecd00c12ffd/40953_2021_257_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a768/8556800/3fb69cd2d6f6/40953_2021_257_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a768/8556800/03b141b28db4/40953_2021_257_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a768/8556800/994e351e196d/40953_2021_257_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a768/8556800/bdfb66d92a51/40953_2021_257_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a768/8556800/774b58336648/40953_2021_257_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a768/8556800/e990c6c25913/40953_2021_257_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a768/8556800/b0a366757f4d/40953_2021_257_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a768/8556800/eac2ccdda98c/40953_2021_257_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a768/8556800/8889fb9a8cd8/40953_2021_257_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a768/8556800/aecd00c12ffd/40953_2021_257_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a768/8556800/3fb69cd2d6f6/40953_2021_257_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a768/8556800/03b141b28db4/40953_2021_257_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a768/8556800/994e351e196d/40953_2021_257_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a768/8556800/bdfb66d92a51/40953_2021_257_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a768/8556800/774b58336648/40953_2021_257_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a768/8556800/e990c6c25913/40953_2021_257_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a768/8556800/b0a366757f4d/40953_2021_257_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a768/8556800/eac2ccdda98c/40953_2021_257_Fig10_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
US QE and the Indian Bond Market.美国量化宽松政策与印度债券市场
J Quant Econ. 2022;20(1):137-157. doi: 10.1007/s40953-021-00257-9. Epub 2021 Oct 30.
2
Impact of RBI's monetary policy announcements on government bond yields: evidence from the pandemic.印度储备银行货币政策公告对政府债券收益率的影响:来自疫情期间的证据
Indian Econ Rev. 2023 May 20:1-31. doi: 10.1007/s41775-023-00171-2.
3
Short-term and long-term interest rate spread's dynamics to risk and the yield curve.短期与长期利率利差对风险及收益率曲线的动态影响。
SN Bus Econ. 2022;2(10):158. doi: 10.1007/s43546-022-00336-w. Epub 2022 Sep 30.
4
A quantitative easing experiment.一次量化宽松实验。
J Econ Dyn Control. 2020 Oct;119:103978. doi: 10.1016/j.jedc.2020.103978. Epub 2020 Aug 29.
5
The US stock market leads the federal funds rate and treasury bond yields.美国股市引领联邦基金利率和美国国债收益率。
PLoS One. 2011;6(8):e22794. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0022794. Epub 2011 Aug 10.
6
Is market liquidity less resilient after the financial crisis? Evidence for US Treasuries.金融危机后市场流动性的弹性是否降低?美国国债的证据。
Econ Model. 2020 Dec;93:217-229. doi: 10.1016/j.econmod.2020.08.001. Epub 2020 Aug 28.
7
Monetary policy responses to COVID-19 in emerging European economies: measuring the QE announcement effects on foreign exchange markets.欧洲新兴经济体对新冠疫情的货币政策应对:衡量量化宽松政策声明对外汇市场的影响。
Empirica (Dordr). 2023 May 14:1-31. doi: 10.1007/s10663-023-09578-9.
8
COVID-19, Seignorage, Quantitative Easing and the Fiscal-Monetary Nexus.新冠疫情、铸币税、量化宽松与财政-货币关系
Comp Econ Stud. 2021;63(2):181-199. doi: 10.1057/s41294-021-00150-7. Epub 2021 Apr 13.
9
Impact of oil prices, the U.S interest rates on Turkey's real estate market. New evidence from combined co-integration and bootstrap ARDL tests.油价、美国利率对土耳其房地产市场的影响。基于联合协整和引导式 ARDL 检验的新证据。
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 4;16(1):e0242672. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242672. eCollection 2021.
10
What drives bank liquidity creation? The interaction of monetary policy and strategic scope.是什么推动了银行流动性创造?货币政策与战略范围的相互作用。
Heliyon. 2024 Jan 9;10(2):e24131. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24131. eCollection 2024 Jan 30.