Suppr超能文献

赫布突触之前:学习与记忆中突触功能的理论之前,兼论威廉·麦克杜格尔早已失传的突触理论

The Hebb Synapse Before Hebb: Theories of Synaptic Function in Learning and Memory Before , With a Discussion of the Long-Lost Synaptic Theory of William McDougall.

作者信息

Brown Richard E, Bligh Thaddeus W B, Garden Jessica F

机构信息

Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.

出版信息

Front Behav Neurosci. 2021 Oct 21;15:732195. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2021.732195. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

Since the work of Semon was rediscovered by Schacter in 1978, there has been a renewed interest is searching for the "engram" as the locus of memory in the brain and Hebb's cell assembly has been equated with Semon's engram. There have been many theories of memory involving some concept of synaptic change, culminating in the "Hebb Synapse" theory in 1949. However, Hebb said that the idea that any two cells or systems of cells that are repeatedly active at the same time will tend to become "associated," was not his idea, but an old one. In this manuscript we give an overview of some of the theories of the neural basis of learning and memory before Hebb and describe the synaptic theory of William McDougall, which appears to have been an idea ahead of its time; so far ahead of its time that it was completely ignored by his contemporaries. We conclude by examining some critiques of McDougall's theory of inhibition and with a short discussion on the fate of neuroscientists whose ideas were neglected when first presented but were accepted as important many decades later.

摘要

自从1978年沙克特重新发现了西蒙的研究成果后,人们对寻找大脑中作为记忆位点的“记忆痕迹”重新产生了兴趣,并且赫布的细胞集合被等同于西蒙的记忆痕迹。关于记忆有许多理论,都涉及到某种突触变化的概念,最终在1949年形成了“赫布突触”理论。然而,赫布表示,任何两个同时反复活跃的细胞或细胞系统会趋于“关联”这一观点,并非他的原创,而是一个古老的观点。在本手稿中,我们概述了赫布之前的一些学习和记忆神经基础理论,并描述了威廉·麦克杜格尔的突触理论,该理论似乎超前于其时代;超前到被同时代的人完全忽视。我们通过审视对麦克杜格尔抑制理论的一些批评来得出结论,并简短讨论那些观点首次提出时被忽视,但几十年后被视为重要的神经科学家的命运。

相似文献

5
Memory Engram Cells Have Come of Age.记忆印痕细胞已臻成熟。
Neuron. 2015 Sep 2;87(5):918-31. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.08.002.
7
Neuronal plasticity: historical roots and evolution of meaning.神经元可塑性:历史根源与意义的演变
Exp Brain Res. 2009 Jan;192(3):307-19. doi: 10.1007/s00221-008-1611-6. Epub 2008 Nov 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Neutron tomography of Van Leeuwenhoek's microscopes.范·列文虎克显微镜的中子断层扫描
Sci Adv. 2021 May 14;7(20). doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abf2402. Print 2021 May.
4
Synaptic Plasticity Forms and Functions.突触可塑性的形式和功能。
Annu Rev Neurosci. 2020 Jul 8;43:95-117. doi: 10.1146/annurev-neuro-090919-022842. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
6
Bases of Jerzy Konorski's theory of synaptic plasticity.耶日·科诺尔斯基突触可塑性理论的基础。
Eur J Neurosci. 2020 May;51(9):1857-1866. doi: 10.1111/ejn.14532. Epub 2019 Aug 16.
7
Is plasticity of synapses the mechanism of long-term memory storage?突触可塑性是长期记忆存储的机制吗?
NPJ Sci Learn. 2019 Jul 2;4:9. doi: 10.1038/s41539-019-0048-y. eCollection 2019.
8
Why Study the History of Neuroscience?为什么要研究神经科学史?
Front Behav Neurosci. 2019 May 22;13:82. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2019.00082. eCollection 2019.
10
Cajal's Interactions with Sherrington and the Croonian Lecture.卡哈尔与谢灵顿的互动和克罗恩讲座。
Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2020 May;303(5):1181-1188. doi: 10.1002/ar.24189. Epub 2019 Jun 17.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验