Agadullina Elena, Ivanov Alexander, Sarieva Irena
School of Psychology, HSE University, Moscow, Russia.
Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 21;12:717838. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.717838. eCollection 2021.
This paper aims to adapt the system justification scales (general, political, economic, and gender) for the Russian socio-cultural context and to carry out their psychometric analysis. In Study 1 ( = 450), the original items from four system justification scales on a Russian sample were tested. The results suggested that none of the original scales worked properly in Russia and all of them demonstrated weak fit indices. In Study 2 ( = 553), culturally specific grounds for system justification in the Russian context were highlighted and tested. The results of this study confirmed that all the adapted scales demonstrated a good fit to the data. In Study 3 ( = 1,011), the invariance of system justification scales and the convergent and discriminant validity of the scales was tested. The results confirmed that the general, political, and economic system justification scales demonstrated full invariance, while the gender system justification scale showed partial invariance for multigroup comparison. All the scales convergent and discriminant validity, which leads to consider them as an effective tool for measuring system justification in various types of social relationships in Russia. The role of socio-cultural characteristics in justifying the status quo is discussed.
本文旨在使系统正当性量表（通用、政治、经济和性别）适用于俄罗斯社会文化背景，并对其进行心理测量分析。在研究1（N = 450）中，对俄罗斯样本上四个系统正当性量表的原始项目进行了测试。结果表明，所有原始量表在俄罗斯均无法正常发挥作用，且所有量表的拟合指数均较弱。在研究2（N = 553）中，突出并测试了俄罗斯背景下系统正当性的文化特定依据。该研究结果证实，所有改编后的量表与数据拟合良好。在研究3（N = 1,011）中，测试了系统正当性量表的不变性以及量表的收敛效度和区分效度。结果证实，通用、政治和经济系统正当性量表表现出完全不变性，而性别系统正当性量表在多组比较中表现出部分不变性。所有量表都具有收敛效度和区分效度，这使得它们可被视为测量俄罗斯各类社会关系中系统正当性的有效工具。本文还讨论了社会文化特征在为现状提供正当理由方面的作用。
