Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Stroke Division, The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2022 May 16;37(4):775-788. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acab086.
The aim of this study was to understand clinicians' experiences of teleneuropsychology service implementation within rural inpatient rehabilitation settings and the variability of those experiences across rural settings and clinical disciplines.
Clinicians (n = 56 from four rehabilitation settings) who were involved in a hub-and-spoke teleneuropsychology service completed surveys throughout service implementation. A purposive sample of 16 clinicians then completed semi-structured interviews at the conclusion of the service implementation period. Quantitative data were analyzed descriptively and qualitative data were analyzed using thematic analysis, prior to the results being converged.
Four themes characterizing clinicians' experiences were identified. Pre- and early-implementation considerations included factors such as early collaboration and consultation, which were identified as important for service integration into rural settings. Facilitators/barriers included factors such as technology usability, which positively or negatively influenced service implementation. Benefits and outcomes included perceptions on the impact of the service, such as improved equity and quality of care in rural settings. Finally, future applications encapsulated what the clinicians envisaged for the future of teleneuropsychology services, such as hybrid teleneuropsychology/in-person services. Some differences were identified in clinicians' experiences across rural settings and disciplines, including preferences for technology infrastructure and satisfaction with teleneuropsychology sessions.
Most clinicians reported positive experiences and acceptability of the teleneuropsychology service. Facilitators and barriers, which can guide the successful establishment of future teleneuropsychology services, were identified. These findings may be used to contribute to improving equity and quality of care for people living with neuropsychological impairments, especially those living in rural areas.
本研究旨在了解临床医生在农村住院康复环境中实施远程神经心理学服务的经验,以及这些经验在农村环境和临床学科之间的差异。
参与轮辐式远程神经心理学服务的临床医生(来自四个康复环境的 56 名)在服务实施过程中完成了调查。在服务实施结束时,对 16 名临床医生进行了有针对性的半结构访谈。在结果融合之前,对定量数据进行了描述性分析,对定性数据进行了主题分析。
确定了四个描述临床医生经验的主题。实施前和早期实施的考虑因素包括早期合作和咨询等因素,这些因素被认为对服务融入农村环境很重要。促进因素/障碍包括技术可用性等因素,这些因素对服务实施产生了积极或消极的影响。效益和结果包括对服务影响的看法,例如在农村地区改善公平性和护理质量。最后,未来的应用包括临床医生对远程神经心理学服务未来的设想,例如混合远程神经心理学/面对面服务。在农村环境和学科之间,临床医生的经验存在一些差异,包括对技术基础设施的偏好和对远程神经心理学会议的满意度。
大多数临床医生报告了对远程神经心理学服务的积极体验和接受度。确定了促进因素和障碍,这些因素可以指导未来远程神经心理学服务的成功建立。这些发现可用于改善神经心理障碍患者,特别是农村地区患者的公平性和护理质量。