Psychiatry, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Institute for Clinical Research, National Institutes of Health, Shah Alam, Malaysia.
BMJ Open. 2021 Jun 30;11(6):e043923. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043923.
To explore primary care clinician perceptions of barriers and facilitators in delivering care for common mental disorders (CMD) before and after implementation of a consultation-liaison psychiatry service (Psychiatry in Primary Care (PIPC)) in government-operated primary care clinics and to explore the clinicians' experience of the PIPC service itself.
This longitudinal qualitative study was informed by the Normalisation Process Model and involved audiotaped semi-structured individual interviews with front-line clinicians before (Time 1) and after (Time 2) the PIPC intervention. The Framework Method was used in the thematic analysis of pre/post interview transcripts.
Two government-operated primary care clinics in Penang, Malaysia.
17 primary care medical, nursing and allied health staff recruited purposely to achieve a range of disciplines and a balanced representation from both clinics.
Psychiatrists, accompanied by medical students in small numbers, provided one half-day consultation visit per week, to front-line clinicians in each clinic over an 8-month period. The service involved psychiatric assessment of patients with suspected CMDs, with face-to-face discussion with the referring clinician before and after the patient assessment.
At Time 1 interviewees tended to equate CMDs with stress and embraced a holistic model of care while also reporting considerable autonomy in mental healthcare and positively appraising their current practices. At Time 2, post-intervention, participants demonstrated a shift towards greater understanding of CMDs as treatable conditions. They reported time pressures and the demands of key performance indicators in other areas as barriers to participation in PIPC. Yet they showed increased awareness of current service deficits and of their potential in delivering improved mental healthcare.
Despite resource-related and structural barriers to implementation of national mental health policy in Malaysian primary care settings, our findings suggest that front-line clinicians are receptive to future interventions designed to improve the mental healthcare capacity.
在政府运营的基层医疗诊所中实施联络精神病学服务(初级保健中的精神病学(PIPC))前后,探索初级保健临床医生在提供常见精神障碍(CMD)护理方面的障碍和促进因素的看法,并探讨临床医生对 PIPC 服务本身的体验。
这项纵向定性研究以正常化过程模型为指导,在 PIPC 干预前后(时间 1 和时间 2),对一线临床医生进行了录音半结构化个人访谈。使用框架方法对预/后访谈记录进行主题分析。
马来西亚槟城的两家政府运营的基层医疗诊所。
从两家诊所中特意招募了 17 名基层医疗的医疗、护理和相关卫生人员,以实现各种学科的平衡,并平衡来自两家诊所的代表性。
精神科医生在少数医学生的陪同下,每周提供一次为期半天的咨询服务,为每家诊所的一线临床医生提供服务,为期 8 个月。该服务包括对疑似 CMD 患者进行精神病学评估,并在患者评估前后与转诊临床医生进行面对面讨论。
在时间 1 时,受访者倾向于将 CMDs 等同于压力,并接受整体护理模式,同时还报告了在精神保健方面相当大的自主权,并对其当前实践给予积极评价。在时间 2 时,即干预后,参与者表现出对可治疗疾病的 CMDs 的理解有所转变。他们报告说,时间压力和其他领域的关键绩效指标的要求是参与 PIPC 的障碍。然而,他们提高了对当前服务缺陷及其在提供改进的精神保健方面的潜力的认识。
尽管在马来西亚基层医疗环境中实施国家精神卫生政策存在资源相关和结构性障碍,但我们的研究结果表明,一线临床医生对旨在提高精神保健能力的未来干预措施持开放态度。