Suppr超能文献

阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者持续气道正压通气(CPAP)治疗失败的预测因素。

Predictive factors for CPAP failure in obstructive sleep apnea patients.

作者信息

Goyal Abhishek, Joshi Ankur, Mitra Arun, Khurana Alkesh, Chaudhary Poonam

机构信息

Department of Pulmonary Medicine, AIIMS, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.

Department of Community and Family Medicine, Madhya Pradesh, India.

出版信息

Lung India. 2021 Nov-Dec;38(6):540-544. doi: 10.4103/lungindia.lungindia_867_20.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Some patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) do not respond to Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) and for these patients, Bi-level PAP is the next level modality. This study by a theory driven hierarchical approach, tries to identify the predictors for CPAP failure among OSA patients.

METHODOLOGY

The potential predictors for the model were identified from a theoretical framework rooted in clinical examination, laboratory parameters, and polysomnographic variables pertaining to OSA patients. All patients of OSA who underwent manual titration with CPAP or Bi-level PAP (in case of CPAP Failure) between June 2015 and October 2017 were included in model building. This study compared five competitive models blocks deliberated by increasing order of diagnostic complexity and availability of resources. The fitting of the model was determined by both internal and external validation.

RESULTS

Among the five competitive models, the selected model has the significant deviance reduction (-2LL = 121.99, X = 25.55, P < 0.0001) from the baseline model (-2LL = 217.356). This logistic regression model consists of the following binary predictors - Age >60 years (odds ratio [OR] = 3.23 [1.27-8.23]), body mass index >35 Kg/m (OR = 4.25 [1.78-10.13]), forced expiratory volume <60% (OR = 7.33 [2.83-18.72]), apnea-hypopnea index >75 (OR = 4.31 [1.61-11.56]) and T90 > 30% (OR = 6.67 [2.57-17.36]).

CONCLUSION

These five factors (acronym as BIPAP) may aid to the clinical decision-making by predicting failure of CPAP and therefore may assist in more vigilant clinical care.

摘要

目的

一些阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)患者对持续气道正压通气(CPAP)无反应,对于这些患者,双水平气道正压通气(Bi-level PAP)是下一级治疗方式。本研究采用理论驱动的分层方法,试图确定OSA患者中CPAP治疗失败的预测因素。

方法

从基于临床检查、实验室参数以及与OSA患者相关的多导睡眠图变量的理论框架中确定模型的潜在预测因素。2015年6月至2017年10月期间接受CPAP或双水平气道正压通气(如CPAP治疗失败)人工滴定的所有OSA患者均纳入模型构建。本研究比较了按诊断复杂性和资源可用性升序考虑的五个竞争模型组。模型的拟合通过内部和外部验证来确定。

结果

在五个竞争模型中,所选模型与基线模型(-2LL = 217.356)相比有显著的偏差减少(-2LL = 121.99,X = 25.55,P < 0.0001)。这个逻辑回归模型由以下二元预测因素组成——年龄>60岁(比值比[OR] = 3.23 [1.27 - 8.23])、体重指数>35 Kg/m(OR = 4.25 [1.78 - 10.13])、用力呼气量<60%(OR = 7.33 [2.83 - 18.72])、呼吸暂停低通气指数>75(OR = 4.31 [1.61 - 11.56])和T90>30%(OR = 6.67 [2.57 - 17.36])。

结论

这五个因素(简称为BIPAP)可能通过预测CPAP治疗失败来辅助临床决策,因此可能有助于更警惕的临床护理。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bba4/8614613/3eda317bf1a1/LI-38-540-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验