Gottesman I I, McGuffin P, Farmer A E
Schizophr Bull. 1987;13(1):23-47. doi: 10.1093/schbul/13.1.23.
Although a decade has passed since the genetics of schizophrenia was examined for the Schizophrenia Bulletin, the epigenetic puzzle of schizophrenia has not yielded its secrets to any scientific break-through. In this article we review a sample of the highlights relevant to enlightened genetic thinking, i.e., a broad diathesis-stressor framework with multifactorial causation assumed and with provision for the epigenetic interaction of psychosocial as well as neurobiological factors. The clinical genetic epidemiologist needs to know the lifetime morbid risks generated by different definitions of schizophrenia, as well as the consequences for the familial risks generated by the various family, twin, and adoption strategies. Schizophrenia appears to occur through an interaction of a genetic susceptibility with some kind of environmental stress; the stress need not be an environment containing a person with a diagnosis in the schizophrenia spectrum; the genetic factors in schizophrenia have specificity as they do not increase the risk for major affective disorders or delusional disorder. Clearly, schizophrenia is clinically or phenotypically heterogeneous, but whether this variety is paralleled by etiological heterogeneity or to what extent is problematic. Once the existence of an important genetic predisposition to developing schizophrenia has been established, it becomes important to provide a theory (or theories) to account for its mode (modes) of transmission. Psychiatric geneticists have not yet solved the problem, in part because of the difficulty of specifying the appropriate phenotype to analyze and also because of the unknown degree of heterogeneity. Genetic markers are a special category of biological markers. In addition to conventional markers, the advent of "the new genetics" of recombinant DNA has meant that many more genetic markers (probes) are now available and that the day is not far off when the human genome will be extensively mapped. Considerable optimism exists about the future usefulness of genetic markers in detecting major gene effects and resolving problems of heterogeneity in schizophrenia.
尽管距离为《精神分裂症通报》审视精神分裂症遗传学已过去十年,但精神分裂症的表观遗传谜题尚未向任何科学突破透露其奥秘。在本文中,我们回顾了与开明的遗传学思维相关的一些要点,即一个宽泛的素质-应激框架,假定其具有多因素病因,并考虑了心理社会因素以及神经生物学因素的表观遗传相互作用。临床遗传流行病学家需要了解不同精神分裂症定义所产生的终生患病风险,以及各种家庭、双胞胎和收养研究策略对家族风险所产生的影响。精神分裂症似乎是通过遗传易感性与某种环境压力的相互作用而发生的;这种压力不一定是包含精神分裂症谱系诊断患者的环境;精神分裂症中的遗传因素具有特异性,因为它们不会增加患重度情感障碍或妄想障碍的风险。显然,精神分裂症在临床或表型上是异质性的,但这种多样性是否与病因异质性平行,或者在何种程度上平行,仍是个问题。一旦确定了存在发展为精神分裂症的重要遗传易感性,就有必要提供一种理论(或多种理论)来解释其传递模式(或多种模式)。精神病遗传学家尚未解决这个问题,部分原因是难以确定合适的表型进行分析,也因为异质性程度未知。遗传标记是生物标记的一个特殊类别。除了传统标记外,重组DNA“新遗传学”的出现意味着现在有了更多的遗传标记(探针),而且全面绘制人类基因组图谱的日子也不远了。人们对遗传标记在检测精神分裂症的主要基因效应和解决异质性问题方面的未来用途相当乐观。