Department for Literary Theory, University of Sofia.
Ber Wiss. 2021 Dec;44(4):373-390. doi: 10.1002/bewi.202100006. Epub 2021 Nov 8.
Certain tendencies in Bulgarian academia in the 1960s are explored as constituting a decisive moment in the emancipation of scientific authority from the intrusion of communist political power. With the focus on aesthetics, the major tenet is that, in the face of repression, specific theoretical approaches and currents of thought emerged that proved effective in dismantling dogma and boosting scientific authority vis-à-vis ideological control. Although open clashes with the repressive machinery of the communist regime certainly played a role in advancing the autonomy of science while on the other hand networks existed that allowed the clashes to be resolved in favor of science, emphasis here is on the deliberate shaping of an academic ethos and the implementation of modes of thinking, theoretical tools, and stances that were resilient to control and demonstrated their superiority to dogma. In 1960s aesthetics, this process involved battles surrounding the dogmatic conceptualization of reflection by Stalinist philosopher Todor Pavlov. A theorization of art as the production of freedom emerged in the course of these battles-a theorization which might, in fact, be crucial for this production and therefore a necessary condition for an otherwise fragile potentiality.
20 世纪 60 年代保加利亚学术界的某些趋势被认为是科学权威从共产主义政治权力的干预中解放出来的决定性时刻。以美学为重点,其主要观点是,面对压制,出现了一些特定的理论方法和思想潮流,这些方法和潮流被证明在打破教条和增强科学权威方面是有效的,以对抗意识形态控制。虽然与共产主义政权的镇压机器公开冲突肯定在推进科学自治方面发挥了作用,而另一方面,也存在一些网络,允许以有利于科学的方式解决冲突,但这里的重点是精心塑造学术风气,以及实施经得起控制的思维模式、理论工具和立场,并证明它们优于教条。在 20 世纪 60 年代的美学中,这一过程涉及到围绕斯大林主义哲学家托多尔·帕夫洛夫(Todor Pavlov)对反思的教条式概念化的斗争。在这些斗争中,出现了一种将艺术理论化为自由生产的理论——这一理论实际上可能对这种生产至关重要,因此是脆弱的潜在性的必要条件。