KU Leuven.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2021 Nov 5;33(12):2461-2476. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01778.
Many people develop expertise in specific domains of interest, such as chess, microbiology, radiology, and, the case in point in our study: ornithology. It is poorly understood to what extent such expertise alters brain function. Previous neuroimaging studies of expertise have typically focused upon the category level, for example, selectivity for birds versus nonbird stimuli. We present a multivariate fMRI study focusing upon the representational similarity among objects of expertise at the subordinate level. We compare the neural representational spaces of experts and novices to behavioral judgments. At the behavioral level, ornithologists (n = 20) have more fine-grained and task-dependent representations of item similarity that are more consistent among experts compared to control participants. At the neural level, the neural patterns of item similarity are more distinct and consistent in experts than in novices, which is in line with the behavioral results. In addition, these neural patterns in experts show stronger correlations with behavior compared to novices. These findings were prominent in frontal regions, and some effects were also found in occipitotemporal regions. This study illustrates the potential of an analysis of representational geometry to understand to what extent expertise changes neural information processing.
许多人在特定的感兴趣领域发展出专业知识,例如国际象棋、微生物学、放射学,以及我们研究中的案例:鸟类学。对于这种专业知识在何种程度上改变大脑功能,人们的了解还很有限。先前关于专业知识的神经影像学研究通常集中在类别水平上,例如对鸟类与非鸟类刺激的选择性。我们提出了一项关注下属水平专业知识对象之间代表性相似性的多变量 fMRI 研究。我们将专家和新手的神经表示空间与行为判断进行了比较。在行为层面上,鸟类学家(n = 20)对物品相似性的表示更细致、更依赖任务,并且在专家之间比在对照组中更一致。在神经层面上,物品相似性的神经模式在专家中比在新手中更明显且一致,这与行为结果一致。此外,这些专家的神经模式与行为的相关性比新手更强。这些发现在前额叶区域中较为突出,在枕颞区域也发现了一些影响。这项研究说明了分析代表性几何形状以了解专业知识在何种程度上改变神经信息处理的潜力。