Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London, United Kingdom WC1N 3AZ
Laboratory of Brain and Cognition, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892.
J Neurosci. 2021 Mar 31;41(13):2980-2989. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2489-20.2020. Epub 2021 Feb 9.
The idea that when we use a tool we incorporate it into the neural representation of our body (embodiment) has been a major inspiration for philosophy, science, and engineering. While theoretically appealing, there is little direct evidence for tool embodiment at the neural level. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) in male and female human subjects, we investigated whether expert tool users (London litter pickers: = 7) represent their expert tool more like a hand (neural embodiment) or less like a hand (neural differentiation), as compared with a group of tool novices ( = 12). During fMRI scans, participants viewed first-person videos depicting grasps performed by either a hand, litter picker, or a non-expert grasping tool. Using representational similarity analysis (RSA), differences in the representational structure of hands and tools were measured within occipitotemporal cortex (OTC). Contrary to the neural embodiment theory, we find that the experts group represent their own tool less like a hand (not more) relative to novices. Using a case-study approach, we further replicated this effect, independently, in five of the seven individual expert litter pickers, as compared with the novices. An exploratory analysis in left parietal cortex, a region implicated in visuomotor representations of hands and tools, also indicated that experts do not visually represent their tool more similar to hands, compared with novices. Together, our findings suggest that extensive tool use leads to an increased neural differentiation between visual representations of hands and tools. This evidence provides an important alternative framework to the prominent tool embodiment theory. It is commonly thought that tool use leads to the assimilation of the tool into the neural representation of the body, a process referred to as embodiment. Here, we demonstrate that expert tool users (London litter pickers) neurally represent their own tool less like a hand (not more), compared with novices. Our findings advance our current understanding for how experience shapes functional organization in high-order visual cortex. Further, this evidence provides an alternative framework to the prominent tool embodiment theory, suggesting instead that experience with tools leads to more distinct, separable hand and tool representations.
当我们使用工具时,我们将其融入身体的神经表示(具身认知)的观点一直是哲学、科学和工程学的主要灵感来源。虽然从理论上讲很有吸引力,但在神经水平上几乎没有直接证据证明工具具身认知的存在。我们使用功能磁共振成像(fMRI)对男性和女性人类受试者进行研究,以调查与工具新手组(n=12)相比,专家工具使用者(伦敦拾荒者:n=7)是否更将其专业工具表现为手(神经具身认知)或不那么像手(神经分化)。在 fMRI 扫描期间,参与者观看了第一人称视频,其中描绘了由手、拾荒者或非专业抓握工具执行的抓握动作。使用代表性相似性分析(RSA),在枕颞皮质(OTC)内测量了手和工具的表示结构之间的差异。与神经具身认知理论相反,我们发现与新手相比,专家组对手的工具的表现更不像是手(而不是更像)。使用案例研究方法,我们在五个个体专家拾荒者中独立地复制了这一效果,而不是新手。对涉及手和工具的视觉运动表示的左顶叶皮层的探索性分析也表明,与新手相比,专家并不对手的工具进行更类似于手的视觉表示。总的来说,我们的研究结果表明,广泛的工具使用会导致手和工具的视觉表示之间的神经分化增加。这一证据为突出的工具具身认知理论提供了一个重要的替代框架。人们普遍认为,工具的使用会导致工具被同化到身体的神经表示中,这一过程被称为具身认知。在这里,我们证明与新手相比,专家工具使用者(伦敦拾荒者)对手的工具的神经表示更不像是手(而不是更像)。我们的发现推进了我们对经验如何塑造高级视觉皮层功能组织的理解。此外,这一证据为突出的工具具身认知理论提供了替代框架,表明相反,使用工具会导致更独特、可分离的手和工具表示。