Suppr超能文献

在成熟的下肢假肢使用者中,测量最佳、最差和平均接受腔舒适度比当前的接受腔舒适度测量更可靠。

Measurements of Best, Worst, and Average Socket Comfort Are More Reliable Than Current Socket Comfort in Established Lower Limb Prosthesis Users.

作者信息

Morgan Sara J, Askew Robert L, Hafner Brian J

机构信息

Gillette Children's Specialty Healthcare, St. Paul, Minnesota; University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.

Stetson University, DeLand, Florida.

出版信息

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2022 Jun;103(6):1201-1204. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2021.10.008. Epub 2021 Nov 6.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate test-retest reliability and related measurement properties of items developed to assess best, worst, and average prosthetic socket comfort.

DESIGN

Methodological research to assess test-retest reliability of 4 individual socket comfort survey items. Socket comfort items were included in a self-report paper survey, which was administered to participants 2 to 3 days apart.

SETTING

General community.

PARTICIPANTS

A minimum convenience sample of participants (N=63) was targeted for this study; 72 lower limb prosthesis users (>1y postamputation) completed the survey and were included in the final dataset.

INTERVENTIONS

Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

The expanded socket comfort score (ESCS) was adapted from the original socket comfort score (SCS). The original SCS is a single-item self-report instrument developed to assess a lower limb prosthesis user's current socket comfort. Three additional items were designed to assess the user's best, worst, and average socket comfort over the previous 7 days.

RESULTS

Best, worst, and average socket comfort items demonstrated better reliability, as indicated by higher intraclass correlation coefficients. As such, these items also exhibited lower measurement error and smaller minimal detectable change values than the item that measured current socket comfort. However, test-retest coefficients for all 4 ESCS items were below the level desired for evaluation of within-individual changes of socket comfort.

CONCLUSIONS

Items that assess best, worst, and average comfort provide a more stable measurement of socket fit than the existing SCS instrument. Although administration of all 4 ESCS items may provide more comprehensive assessment of a lower limb prosthesis user's socket fit, administrators should expect variations in scores over time owing to the variable nature of the underlying construct over time. Future research should examine whether the ESCS provides an improved overall assessment of socket fit.

摘要

目的

评估为评估最佳、最差和平均假肢接受腔舒适度而开发的项目的重测信度及相关测量特性。

设计

评估4个单独的接受腔舒适度调查项目重测信度的方法学研究。接受腔舒适度项目包含在一份自填式纸质调查问卷中,在间隔2至3天的时间里对参与者进行调查。

地点

普通社区。

参与者

本研究以最少的便利样本(N = 63)为目标;72名下肢假肢使用者(截肢后>1年)完成了调查并被纳入最终数据集。

干预措施

不适用。

主要观察指标

扩展接受腔舒适度评分(ESCS)是从原始接受腔舒适度评分(SCS)改编而来。原始SCS是一种单项自填式工具,用于评估下肢假肢使用者当前的接受腔舒适度。另外设计了3个项目来评估使用者在过去7天内的最佳、最差和平均接受腔舒适度。

结果

最佳、最差和平均接受腔舒适度项目显示出更好的信度,组内相关系数更高表明了这一点。因此,与测量当前接受腔舒适度的项目相比,这些项目的测量误差更低,最小可检测变化值更小。然而,所有4个ESCS项目的重测系数均低于评估接受腔舒适度个体内变化所需的水平。

结论

评估最佳、最差和平均舒适度的项目比现有的SCS工具能提供更稳定的接受腔适配度测量。尽管使用所有4个ESCS项目可能会对下肢假肢使用者的接受腔适配度提供更全面的评估,但由于潜在结构随时间的变化性质,管理者应预期分数会随时间变化。未来的研究应检验ESCS是否能对接受腔适配度提供更好的总体评估。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验