Suppr超能文献

不同比例环氧树脂和丙烯酸树脂制作的层压式股骨假肢接受腔的表面轮廓分析。

Surface profile analysis of laminated transfemoral prosthetic socket fabricated with different ratios of epoxy resin and acrylic resin.

机构信息

Department of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2023 Feb 15;13(1):2664. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-21990-y.

Abstract

Acrylic and epoxy are common types of resin used in fabricating sockets. Different types of resin will affect the internal surface of a laminated socket. This paper is to determine the best combination of ratio for epoxy and acrylic resin for a laminated prosthesis socket and to evaluate the surface profile analysis of different combinations of laminated prosthetic sockets for surface roughness. Transfemoral sockets were created using various resin-to-hardener ratios of 2:1, 3:1, 3:2, 2:3, and 1:3 for epoxy resin and 100:1, 100:2, 100:3, 100:4, and 100:5 for acrylic resin. Eight layers of stockinette consisting of four elastic stockinette and four Perlon stockinette were used. A sample with a size of 4 cm × 6 cm was cut out from the socket on the lateral side below the Greater Trochanter area. The Mitutoyo Sj-210 Surface Tester stylus was run through the sample and gave the Average Surface Roughness value (Ra), Root Mean Square Roughness value (Rq), and Ten-Point Mean Roughness value (Rz). Epoxy resin shows a smoother surface compared to acrylic resin with Ra values of is 0.766 µm, 0.9716 µm, 0.9847 µm and 1.5461 µm with 3:2, 3:1, 2:1 and 2:3 ratio respectively. However, for epoxy resin with ratio 1:3, the resin does not cure with the hardener. As for acrylic resin the Ra values are 1.0086 µm, 2.362 µm, 3.372 µm, 4.762 µm and 6.074 µm with 100: 1, 100:2, 100:5, 100:4 and 100:3 ratios, respectively. Epoxy resin is a better choice in fabricating a laminated socket considering the surface produced is smoother.

摘要

丙烯树脂和环氧树脂是用于制作义齿腔的常见类型的树脂。不同类型的树脂会影响层压义齿腔的内部表面。本文旨在确定环氧树脂和丙烯树脂的最佳比例组合,以制作层压义齿腔,并评估不同层压义齿腔组合的表面轮廓分析,以评估表面粗糙度。使用各种树脂-固化剂比例为 2:1、3:1、3:2、2:3 和 1:3 的环氧树脂和 100:1、100:2、100:3、100:4 和 100:5 的丙烯树脂制作转股义齿腔。使用了八层由四层弹性丝袜和四层 Perlon 丝袜组成的库存。从大转子区域下方的侧向义齿腔上切下一个 4cm×6cm 的样本。Mitutoyo Sj-210 表面测试仪测针穿过样本,给出平均表面粗糙度值(Ra)、均方根粗糙度值(Rq)和十点平均粗糙度值(Rz)。与丙烯树脂相比,环氧树脂的表面更光滑,Ra 值分别为 0.766µm、0.9716µm、0.9847µm 和 1.5461µm,对应的比例分别为 3:2、3:1、2:1 和 2:3。然而,对于比例为 1:3 的环氧树脂,树脂与固化剂不能固化。对于丙烯树脂,Ra 值分别为 1.0086µm、2.362µm、3.372µm、4.762µm 和 6.074µm,对应的比例分别为 100:1、100:2、100:5、100:4 和 100:3。考虑到制作的表面更光滑,环氧树脂是制作层压义齿腔的更好选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4eff/9932096/dd7c4f8005dd/41598_2022_21990_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验