A tensor with a flat surface overestimates midflexion laxity in total knee arthroplasty: Comparison between a tensor with a flat-shaped surface and a tensor with an insert-shaped surface.

BACKGROUND

Soft tissue balance is important for the success of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Various types of tensors have been developed for the precise measurement of a gap. We hypothesized that the surface shape of the tensor that contacted the TKA component affected the gap measurement. This study aimed to compare the gaps obtained with flat and insert-shaped surface tensors.

METHODS

Two senior surgeons performed 95 TKAs (Vanguard-PS:55 knees; Persona-PS:40 knees). The joint gap was measured in each static knee flexion status (0°, 30°, 45°, 60°, 90°, 120°, and full flexion). We compared the gaps measured with a flat surface tensor and an insert-shape surface tensor. We defined a significant change as a gap difference of >1 mm with a statistical significance.

RESULTS

In Vanguard-PS, significant changes were observed at 30° and 45°. In Persona-PS, significant changes were observed at 30°, 45°, and 60°. In both implants, gaps measured with the flat tensor were larger than those measured with the insert tensor at approximately midflexion, and the significant changes disappeared in higher flexion position over midflexion.

CONCLUSIONS

The surface shape of the tensor affected the measurement of midflexion laxity in TKA. When measuring the gap with a flat tensor, the midflexion laxity was overestimated. A tensor with an insert-shaped surface should be used to measure the gap in TKA.