Suppr超能文献

半口检查在评估牙周病患病率方面的效率。

The efficiency of half-mouth examinations in estimating the prevalence of periodontal disease.

作者信息

Hunt R J

出版信息

J Dent Res. 1987 May;66(5):1044-8. doi: 10.1177/00220345870660051101.

Abstract

Several studies, including the NIDR 1985 national survey of working adults, have used periodontal examinations of only two quadrants of the mouth to estimate the prevalence of periodontal conditions. To investigate the efficiency of half-mouth periodontal examinations, I compared the results from the examination of all teeth in a sample of 477 dentate elderly people with scores that would have been obtained if randomly selected pairs of quadrants had been examined instead. In this elderly dentate population, relatively little information would have been lost if diagonal half-mouth or same-side half-mouth scores instead of whole-mouth scores had been used to estimate the number or proportion of teeth with periodontal conditions. However, the proportion of people with the less prevalent conditions, i.e., deep pocketing and mobility, was underestimated slightly. Slightly less efficiency was also noted for the less prevalent conditions. These findings suggest that half-mouth recording may be useful for prevalence surveys, but cannot be recommended for incidence surveys or clinical trials, where incremental changes may be small.

摘要

包括美国国立牙科研究所1985年对在职成年人进行的全国性调查在内的多项研究,仅通过对口腔两个象限进行牙周检查来估计牙周疾病的患病率。为了研究半口牙周检查的效率,我将477名有牙的老年人样本中所有牙齿的检查结果,与如果改为随机选择成对象限进行检查所获得的分数进行了比较。在这个有牙的老年人群中,如果用对角半口或同侧半口分数而非全口分数来估计患有牙周疾病的牙齿数量或比例,所损失的信息相对较少。然而,患有不太常见病症(即深牙周袋和牙齿松动)的人群比例被略微低估了。对于不太常见的病症,效率也略低。这些发现表明,半口记录可能对患病率调查有用,但对于发病率调查或临床试验则不推荐使用,因为在这些研究中,变化可能很小。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验