• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于结直肠癌的非侵入性粪便检测

Noninvasive fecal testing for colorectal cancer.

作者信息

Zou Jianhua, Xiao Zhanshuo, Wu Yu, Yang Jingyan, Cui Ning

机构信息

China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences Xiyuan Hospital, Beijing, China.

China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences Guanganmen Hospital, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Clin Chim Acta. 2022 Jan 1;524:123-131. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2021.10.030. Epub 2021 Oct 28.

DOI:10.1016/j.cca.2021.10.030
PMID:34756863
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common malignancy worldwide, with the second highest mortality rate among all malignancies. In this review, we describe the current utility of stool diagnostic biomarkers for CRC.

METHODS

We reviewed stool-related tests and biomarker candidates for the diagnosis of CRC. The guaiac-based fecal occult blood test (gFOBT), fecal immunochemical test (FIT), and multitarget stool DNA test (MT-sDNA) have been used as clinical CRC screening tools. Although microRNAs, protein biomarkers, and microbiota have not yet been used in clinical CRC screening, there is growing evidence that they have the potential to function as CRC screening tools.

RESULTS

According to the literature, the sensitivity of MT-sDNA for detecting CRC was 87.0-100%, 32.7-82.0% for advanced adenomas, and the specificity was 86.1-95.2%. The sensitivity of individual biomarkers of fecal microRNAs for detecting CRC was 34.2-88.2%, 73.0% for advanced adenomas, and the specificity was 68-100%. The sensitivity of fecal protein markers for detecting CRC was 63.6-93.0%, 47.7-69.4% for advanced adenomas, and the specificity was 38.3-97.5%. The sensitivity of fecal microbiota for detecting CRC was 54.0-100.0%, 32.0-48.3% for advanced adenomas, and the specificity was 61.3-90.0%.

CONCLUSION

MT-sDNA is the most sensitive CRC screening test, and its sensitivity is the highest for advanced adenomas; however, its detection cost is high. MT-sDNA was more sensitive to CRC and advanced precancerous lesions than FIT, but compared to three years of MT-sDNA, annual FIT as the first non-invasive screening test for CRC seemed to be more effective.

摘要

引言

结直肠癌(CRC)是全球第三大常见恶性肿瘤,在所有恶性肿瘤中死亡率排名第二。在本综述中,我们描述了粪便诊断生物标志物在CRC诊断中的当前应用。

方法

我们回顾了用于CRC诊断的粪便相关检测和生物标志物候选物。基于愈创木脂的粪便潜血试验(gFOBT)、粪便免疫化学试验(FIT)和多靶点粪便DNA检测(MT-sDNA)已被用作临床CRC筛查工具。尽管微小RNA、蛋白质生物标志物和微生物群尚未用于临床CRC筛查,但越来越多的证据表明它们有潜力作为CRC筛查工具。

结果

根据文献,MT-sDNA检测CRC的敏感性为87.0 - 100%,检测进展期腺瘤的敏感性为32.7 - 82.0%,特异性为86.1 - 95.2%。粪便微小RNA的单个生物标志物检测CRC的敏感性为34.2 - 88.2%,检测进展期腺瘤的敏感性为73.0%,特异性为68 - 100%。粪便蛋白质标志物检测CRC的敏感性为63.6 - 93.0%,检测进展期腺瘤的敏感性为47.7 - 69.4%,特异性为38.3 - 97.5%。粪便微生物群检测CRC的敏感性为54.0 - 100.0%,检测进展期腺瘤的敏感性为32.0 - 48.3%,特异性为61.3 - 90.0%。

结论

MT-sDNA是最敏感的CRC筛查试验,对进展期腺瘤的敏感性最高;然而,其检测成本较高。MT-sDNA对CRC和癌前病变的敏感性高于FIT,但与三年的MT-sDNA相比,每年进行FIT作为CRC的首次非侵入性筛查试验似乎更有效。

相似文献

1
Noninvasive fecal testing for colorectal cancer.用于结直肠癌的非侵入性粪便检测
Clin Chim Acta. 2022 Jan 1;524:123-131. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2021.10.030. Epub 2021 Oct 28.
2
Analysis of the effectiveness of two noninvasive fecal tests used to screen for colorectal cancer in average-risk adults.分析两种用于筛查普通风险成年人结直肠癌的非侵入性粪便检测的有效性。
Public Health. 2020 May;182:70-76. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2020.01.021. Epub 2020 Mar 13.
3
PPV and Detection Rate of mt-sDNA Testing, FIT, and CT Colonography for Advanced Neoplasia: A Hierarchic Bayesian Meta-Analysis of the Noninvasive Colorectal Screening Tests.多聚酶链反应(PCR)和 mt-sDNA 检测、粪便免疫化学检测(FIT)、CT 结肠成像用于高级别瘤变的检测率:非侵入性结直肠筛查试验的分层贝叶斯荟萃分析。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2021 Oct;217(4):817-830. doi: 10.2214/AJR.20.25416. Epub 2021 Mar 11.
4
Healthcare costs, resource utilization, and productivity loss associated with colorectal cancer screening.与结直肠癌筛查相关的医疗保健成本、资源利用和生产力损失。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2023 Jul-Dec;23(7):843-852. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2023.2220965. Epub 2023 Jul 18.
5
USPSTF colorectal cancer screening guidelines: an extended look at multi-year interval testing.美国预防服务工作组结直肠癌筛查指南:对多年间隔期检测的深入探讨
Am J Manag Care. 2016 Feb 1;22(2):e77-81.
6
Multitarget Stool DNA Test Performance in an Average-Risk Colorectal Cancer Screening Population.多靶点粪便 DNA 检测在一般风险结直肠癌筛查人群中的性能。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2019 Dec;114(12):1909-1918. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000445.
7
A novel multitarget stool DNA test for colorectal cancer screening.一种用于结直肠癌筛查的新型多靶点粪便DNA检测方法。
Postgrad Med. 2016;128(2):268-72. doi: 10.1080/00325481.2016.1135035. Epub 2016 Jan 12.
8
Estimating the impact of differential adherence on the comparative effectiveness of stool-based colorectal cancer screening using the CRC-AIM microsimulation model.利用 CRC-AIM 微观模拟模型估计基于粪便的结直肠癌筛查比较效果的差异依从性影响。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 29;15(12):e0244431. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244431. eCollection 2020.
9
Stool DNA Testing for Screening Detection of Colorectal Neoplasia in Alaska Native People.粪便 DNA 检测用于阿拉斯加原住民结直肠癌筛查检测。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2016 Jan;91(1):61-70. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2015.10.008. Epub 2015 Oct 28.
10
Multitarget stool DNA tests increases colorectal cancer screening among previously noncompliant Medicare patients.多靶点粪便DNA检测增加了既往不依从的医疗保险患者的结直肠癌筛查率。
World J Gastroenterol. 2017 Jan 21;23(3):464-471. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i3.464.

引用本文的文献

1
Advancements in DNA methylation technologies and their application in cancer diagnosis.DNA甲基化技术的进展及其在癌症诊断中的应用。
Epigenetics. 2025 Dec;20(1):2539995. doi: 10.1080/15592294.2025.2539995. Epub 2025 Jul 28.
2
Gut Microbiota Dysbiosis: Pathogenesis, Diseases, Prevention, and Therapy.肠道微生物群失调:发病机制、疾病、预防与治疗
MedComm (2020). 2025 Apr 18;6(5):e70168. doi: 10.1002/mco2.70168. eCollection 2025 May.
3
Utility of Stool-Based Tests for Colorectal Cancer Detection: A Comprehensive Review.基于粪便检测在结直肠癌检测中的应用:一项综述
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Aug 18;12(16):1645. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12161645.
4
SnoRNA profiling in colorectal cancer and assessment of non-invasive biomarker capacity by ddPCR in fecal samples.结直肠癌中的小核仁RNA分析以及通过数字滴度PCR评估粪便样本中的非侵入性生物标志物能力。
iScience. 2024 Feb 20;27(3):109283. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.109283. eCollection 2024 Mar 15.
5
From-Toilet-to-Freezer: A Review on Requirements for an Automatic Protocol to Collect and Store Human Fecal Samples for Research Purposes.从马桶到冰箱:关于用于研究目的的人类粪便样本采集与存储自动方案要求的综述
Biomedicines. 2023 Sep 28;11(10):2658. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11102658.
6
Fecal microbial biomarkers combined with multi-target stool DNA test improve diagnostic accuracy for colorectal cancer.粪便微生物生物标志物联合多靶点粪便DNA检测可提高结直肠癌的诊断准确性。
World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2023 Aug 15;15(8):1424-1435. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v15.i8.1424.
7
The Importance of Evaluating Serum Levels of Tumor Markers M2-PK and Inhibin A in Patients Undergoing Colonoscopy.评估行结肠镜检查患者血清肿瘤标志物 M2-PK 和抑制素 A 水平的重要性。
Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2023 Jan-Dec;22:15330338231194492. doi: 10.1177/15330338231194492.
8
Colorectal cancer and gut microbiota studies in China.中国的结直肠癌与肠道微生物组研究。
Gut Microbes. 2023 Jan-Dec;15(1):2236364. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2023.2236364.
9
Diagnostic accuracy of the multi-target stool DNA test in detecting colorectal cancer: A hospital-based study.多靶点粪便DNA检测在结直肠癌诊断中的准确性:一项基于医院的研究。
World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2023 Jan 15;15(1):102-111. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v15.i1.102.
10
MicroRNA-based signature for diagnosis and prognosis of colorectal cancer using residuum of fecal immunochemical test.基于粪便免疫化学检测残留物的 microRNA 特征用于结直肠癌的诊断和预后。
Biomed J. 2023 Feb;46(1):144-153. doi: 10.1016/j.bj.2022.01.011. Epub 2022 Jan 22.