文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

多靶点粪便DNA检测在结直肠癌诊断中的准确性:一项基于医院的研究。

Diagnostic accuracy of the multi-target stool DNA test in detecting colorectal cancer: A hospital-based study.

作者信息

Gao Han-Lu, Lv Le-Bin, Zhao Wang-Fang, Lu Qi-Wen, Fan Jin-Qing

机构信息

Department of Preventive Health, The Affiliated Hospital of Medical School of Ningbo University, Ningbo, Zhejiang Province, China.

Department of Gastroenterology, The Affiliated Hospital of Medical School of Ningbo University, Ningbo 315000, Zhejiang Province, China.

出版信息

World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2023 Jan 15;15(1):102-111. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v15.i1.102.


DOI:10.4251/wjgo.v15.i1.102
PMID:36684047
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9850761/
Abstract

BACKGROUND: The multi-target stool DNA test (MT-sDNA) has potential utility in the detection of colorectal cancer (CRC), but validation of its clinical accuracy has been limited in China. AIM: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of MT-sDNA and investigate the combined diagnostic value of alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), and carbohydrate antigen 199 (CA199) with MT-sDNA in CRC and adenomas. METHODS: We evaluated the performance of the MT-sDNA kit based on a hospital clinical trial. In this case-control study, 135 participants from the Affiliated Hospital of Medical School of Ningbo University, including 51 CRC patients, 23 patients with adenomas, and 61 healthy controls were enrolled. We used a risk scoring system to determine the positivity of tests with histological diagnosis or colonoscopy as the reference standard. RESULTS: The main indices of sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were evaluated. The sensitivity and specificity for CRC detection were 90.2% and 83.3%, respectively, with an accuracy of 89.8%. For adenoma, the sensitivity and specificity were 56.5% and 68.9%, respectively, with an accuracy of 73.1%. The sensitivity and specificity of MT-sDNA combined with CEA in the diagnosis of adenoma were 78.3% and 60.7%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The MT-sDNA test showed better performance in the detection of CRC, which was superior to AFP, CEA, and CA199 separately, but not for predicting adenomas. The combination of MT-sDNA with CEA further improved the sensitivity for adenoma diagnosis.

摘要

背景:多靶点粪便DNA检测(MT-sDNA)在结直肠癌(CRC)检测中具有潜在应用价值,但在中国其临床准确性的验证有限。 目的:评估MT-sDNA的诊断性能,并研究甲胎蛋白(AFP)、癌胚抗原(CEA)和糖类抗原199(CA199)与MT-sDNA联合检测在CRC和腺瘤中的诊断价值。 方法:我们基于一项医院临床试验评估了MT-sDNA试剂盒的性能。在这项病例对照研究中,纳入了宁波大学医学院附属医院的135名参与者,包括51例CRC患者、23例腺瘤患者和61名健康对照。我们使用风险评分系统以组织学诊断或结肠镜检查作为参考标准来确定检测的阳性结果。 结果:评估了敏感性、特异性和准确性等主要指标。CRC检测的敏感性和特异性分别为90.2%和83.3%,准确性为89.8%。对于腺瘤,敏感性和特异性分别为56.5%和68.9%,准确性为73.1%。MT-sDNA联合CEA诊断腺瘤的敏感性和特异性分别为78.3%和60.7%。 结论:MT-sDNA检测在CRC检测中表现较好,优于单独检测AFP、CEA和CA199,但在预测腺瘤方面效果不佳。MT-sDNA与CEA联合进一步提高了腺瘤诊断的敏感性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/543d/9850761/1b9cd2a0a01a/WJGO-15-102-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/543d/9850761/a9b6025c2268/WJGO-15-102-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/543d/9850761/1b9cd2a0a01a/WJGO-15-102-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/543d/9850761/a9b6025c2268/WJGO-15-102-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/543d/9850761/1b9cd2a0a01a/WJGO-15-102-g002.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Diagnostic accuracy of the multi-target stool DNA test in detecting colorectal cancer: A hospital-based study.

World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2023-1-15

[2]
Fecal microbial biomarkers combined with multi-target stool DNA test improve diagnostic accuracy for colorectal cancer.

World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2023-8-15

[3]
Multitarget stool DNA test compared with fecal occult blood test for colorectal cancer screening.

Oncol Lett. 2020-8

[4]
Analysis of the effectiveness of two noninvasive fecal tests used to screen for colorectal cancer in average-risk adults.

Public Health. 2020-3-13

[5]
Multitarget Stool DNA Test Performance in an Average-Risk Colorectal Cancer Screening Population.

Am J Gastroenterol. 2019-12

[6]
Influence of Colorectal Cancer Risk Factors on Predictive Value of a Positive Multitarget Stool DNA Test.

J Clin Gastroenterol.

[7]
Diagnostic Accuracy of Stool Tests for Colorectal Cancer Surveillance in Hodgkin Lymphoma Survivors.

J Clin Med. 2020-1-10

[8]
Cross-cultural validation of stool Based Colorectal cancer screening methods in the North West of Iran.

Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2022-3-12

[9]
Estimated impact and value of blood-based colorectal cancer screening at varied adherence compared with stool-based screening.

J Med Econ. 2024

[10]
Noninvasive fecal testing for colorectal cancer.

Clin Chim Acta. 2022-1-1

引用本文的文献

[1]
Epidemiology and early screening strategies for colorectal cancer in China.

Chin J Cancer Res. 2023-12-30

[2]
Novel biomarkers used for early diagnosis and tyrosine kinase inhibitors as targeted therapies in colorectal cancer.

Front Pharmacol. 2023-9-1

本文引用的文献

[1]
Feasibility of quantification based on novel evaluation with stool DNA and fecal immunochemical test for colorectal cancer detection.

BMC Gastroenterol. 2022-8-13

[2]
Methylated Septin9 has moderate diagnostic value in colorectal cancer detection in Chinese population: a multicenter study.

BMC Gastroenterol. 2022-5-11

[3]
Advances in tests for colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis.

Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2022-4

[4]
A Practical Overview of the Stool DNA Test for Colorectal Cancer Screening.

Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2022-4-1

[5]
Colonoscopy Findings in FIT+ and mt-sDNA+ Patients versus in Colonoscopy-only Patients: New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry Data.

Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2022-7-5

[6]
Cancer statistics in China and United States, 2022: profiles, trends, and determinants.

Chin Med J (Engl). 2022-2-9

[7]
Diagnostic accuracy of multitarget stool DNA testing for colorectal cancer screening: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022-12

[8]
Cancer statistics, 2022.

CA Cancer J Clin. 2022-1

[9]
Comparison of Performance of Two Stool DNA Tests and a Fecal Immunochemical Test in Detecting Colorectal Neoplasm: A Multicenter Diagnostic Study.

Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2022-3-1

[10]
Noninvasive fecal testing for colorectal cancer.

Clin Chim Acta. 2022-1-1

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索