• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
[Shifts in Epistemological Position. Alexander Mitscherlich's Plea for Psychosomatic Medicine].[认识论立场的转变。亚历山大·米歇利希对身心医学的呼吁]
NTM. 2021 Dec;29(4):417-446. doi: 10.1007/s00048-021-00318-3. Epub 2021 Nov 10.
2
[Causality, Evidence, and Subjectivity: Paul Martini's Methodological Critique of Psychosomatic Medicine].[因果关系、证据与主观性:保罗·马蒂尼对心身医学的方法论批判]
NTM. 2021 Dec;29(4):387-416. doi: 10.1007/s00048-021-00316-5. Epub 2021 Nov 4.
3
[Is the psyche antiquated? A typology of psychotherapeutic critique of civilization in the works of Alexander Mitscherlich].[心理是否过时?亚历山大·米歇利希作品中对文明的心理治疗批判类型学]
Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 1995 Aug;45(8):277-84.
4
[Psychosomatics, psychoanalysis, critique of civilization. Alexander Mitscherlich's Collected Writings].[身心医学、精神分析、文明批判。亚历山大·米切尔利希文集]
Psyche (Stuttg). 1984 Nov;38(11):1023-52.
5
[History of psychosomatic medicine in Heidelberg. V. v. Weizsäcker and A. Mitscherlich as clinic founders].[海德堡心身医学史。V. v. 魏茨泽克和A. 米切尔利希作为临床创始人]
Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 1992 May;42(5):175-86.
6
[Clinical "Experience" as a Criterion of Evidence? Psychiatric Contributions to a Post-War Debate on a "Reform of Medicine" and the Development of Jürg Zutt's "Understanding Anthropology"].[临床“经验”作为证据标准?精神病学对战后关于“医学改革”辩论的贡献以及于尔根·祖特“理解人类学”的发展]
NTM. 2021 Dec;29(4):447-473. doi: 10.1007/s00048-021-00319-2. Epub 2021 Nov 11.
7
[Alexander Mitscherlich's analytic social psychology].[亚历山大·米切尔利希的分析社会心理学]
Psyche (Stuttg). 1983 Apr;37(4):352-63.
8
[Alexander Mitscherlich's "Rider Book"].[亚历山大·米切尔利希的《骑手之书》]
Psyche (Stuttg). 1987 Dec;41(12):1057-66.
9
["We all have reason to envy you the rich experience you are having". Walter-Fritz Seemann's stay in Chicago as reflected in his correspondence with Alexander Mitscherlich].["我们都有理由羡慕你正在经历的丰富经历。”沃尔特 - 弗里茨·泽曼在芝加哥的逗留,体现在他与亚历山大·米歇利希的通信中]
Luzif Amor. 2016;29(58):7-33.
10
[Medical anthropology in academies: on the criticism of natural science medicine exemplified by Viktor von Weizsäcker].[学术界的医学人类学:以维克托·冯·魏茨泽克为例对自然科学医学的批判]
Acta Hist Leopoldina. 2014(64):243-57.

本文引用的文献

1
[Revisited: Michael Balint. The doctor, his patient and the illness].[再探:迈克尔·巴林特。医生、患者与疾病]
Pneumologie. 2010 May;64(5):278-80. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1243962. Epub 2010 Mar 8.
2
Methods and principles of research on psychosomatic fundamentals (the contribution of psychoanalysis to psychosomatic medicine).心身基础研究的方法与原则(精神分析对心身医学的贡献)
Fortschr Psychosom Med. 1960;1:31-45. doi: 10.1159/000386481.
3
[Principal remarks on the problem of psychosomatic diseases].[关于身心疾病问题的主要论述]
Psyche (Stuttg). 1958 Dec;12(9):521-2.
4
[Resistance against psychosomatic treatment].[对身心治疗的抵抗]
Psyche (Stuttg). 1958 Dec;12(9):510-20.
5
[Rational therapy & psychotherapy].[理性疗法与心理治疗]
Psyche (Stuttg). 1958 Jul;12(4):721-31.
6
Columbia-Pennsylvania: studies in the sociology of medical education.《哥伦比亚-宾夕法尼亚:医学教育社会学研究》
J Med Educ. 1956 Aug;31(8):552-65.
7
[Not Available].[无可用内容]
Wurzbg Medizinhist Mitt. 1993;11:77-99.

[认识论立场的转变。亚历山大·米歇利希对身心医学的呼吁]

[Shifts in Epistemological Position. Alexander Mitscherlich's Plea for Psychosomatic Medicine].

作者信息

Dörre Steffen

机构信息

Institut für Geschichte der Medizin, JLU Gießen, Gießen, Deutschland.

出版信息

NTM. 2021 Dec;29(4):417-446. doi: 10.1007/s00048-021-00318-3. Epub 2021 Nov 10.

DOI:10.1007/s00048-021-00318-3
PMID:34757447
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8608775/
Abstract

This paper examines the shifts in Alexander Mitscherlich's epistemological position in the 1940s, 50s and 60s via his plea for psychosomatic medicine. These shifts illustrate the post-war controversy among psychiatrists, physicians, and psychotherapists about what constitutes valid and practically relevant knowledge. The subjectivity of patients is key to Mitscherlich's concept of disease. This informs his continuous criticism of the use of statistical methods to validate individual diagnoses and hypotheses. This paper shows that Mitscherlich's criticism of a science-based medical methodology is highly adaptable, even though, in spite of many theoretical changes and adaptations, the main thrust of his approach remains consistent.

摘要

本文通过亚历山大·米切利希对身心医学的呼吁,审视了他在20世纪40年代、50年代和60年代认识论立场的转变。这些转变说明了战后精神科医生、内科医生和心理治疗师之间关于什么构成有效且具有实际相关性的知识的争论。患者的主观性是米切利希疾病概念的关键。这使他不断批评使用统计方法来验证个体诊断和假设。本文表明,尽管米切利希对基于科学的医学方法论的批评经历了许多理论变化和调整,但其主要观点仍保持一致,具有很强的适应性。