Departments of Medicine (Division of Artificial Intelligence), Imaging, and Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Division of Cardiology, Mount Sinai St. Luke's Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
J Nucl Cardiol. 2022 Dec;29(6):3003-3014. doi: 10.1007/s12350-021-02810-8. Epub 2021 Nov 10.
Diabetes mellitus (DM) is increasingly prevalent among contemporary populations referred for cardiac stress testing, but its potency as a predictor for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) vs other clinical variables is not well delineated.
From 19,658 patients who underwent SPECT-MPI, we identified 3122 patients with DM without known coronary artery disease (CAD) (DM+/CAD-) and 3564 without DM with known CAD (DM-/CAD+). Propensity score matching was used to control for the differences in characteristics between DM+/CAD- and DM-/CAD+ groups. There was comparable MACE in the matched DM+/CAD- and DM-/CAD+ groups (HR 1.15, 95% CI 0.97-1.37). By Chi-square analysis, type of stress (exercise or pharmacologic), total perfusion deficit (TPD), and left ventricular function were the most potent predictors of MACE, followed by CAD and DM status. The combined consideration of mode of stress, TPD, and DM provided synergistic stratification, an 8.87-fold (HR 8.87, 95% CI 7.27-10.82) increase in MACE among pharmacologically stressed patients with DM and TPD > 10% (vs non-ischemic, exercised stressed patients without DM).
Propensity-matched patients with DM and no known CAD have similar MACE risk compared to patients with known CAD and no DM. DM is synergistic with mode of stress testing and TPD in predicting the risk of cardiac stress test patients.
糖尿病(DM)在接受心脏应激测试的当代人群中越来越普遍,但它作为主要不良心血管事件(MACE)的预测因子的效力与其他临床变量相比,尚未得到很好的描述。
从接受 SPECT-MPI 的 19658 例患者中,我们确定了 3122 例无已知冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的糖尿病患者(DM+/CAD-)和 3564 例无已知 CAD 的无糖尿病患者(DM-/CAD+)。采用倾向评分匹配来控制 DM+/CAD-和 DM-/CAD+组之间特征的差异。在匹配的 DM+/CAD-和 DM-/CAD+组中,MACE 发生率相当(HR 1.15,95%CI 0.97-1.37)。通过卡方分析,应激类型(运动或药物)、总灌注缺陷(TPD)和左心室功能是 MACE 的最强预测因子,其次是 CAD 和 DM 状态。综合考虑应激方式、TPD 和 DM 提供了协同分层,药物应激且 TPD>10%的糖尿病患者的 MACE 风险增加了 8.87 倍(HR 8.87,95%CI 7.27-10.82)(与非缺血、无 DM 的运动应激患者相比)。
与患有已知 CAD 但无 DM 的患者相比,患有 DM 且无已知 CAD 的倾向评分匹配患者的 MACE 风险相似。DM 与应激测试方式和 TPD 协同预测心脏应激试验患者的风险。