Suppr超能文献

比较糖尿病与其他预后预测因素在因心脏应激测试而转诊的患者中的表现:REFINE SPECT 注册研究的当代分析。

Comparison of diabetes to other prognostic predictors among patients referred for cardiac stress testing: A contemporary analysis from the REFINE SPECT Registry.

机构信息

Departments of Medicine (Division of Artificial Intelligence), Imaging, and Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Division of Cardiology, Mount Sinai St. Luke's Hospital, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

J Nucl Cardiol. 2022 Dec;29(6):3003-3014. doi: 10.1007/s12350-021-02810-8. Epub 2021 Nov 10.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is increasingly prevalent among contemporary populations referred for cardiac stress testing, but its potency as a predictor for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) vs other clinical variables is not well delineated.

METHODS AND RESULTS

From 19,658 patients who underwent SPECT-MPI, we identified 3122 patients with DM without known coronary artery disease (CAD) (DM+/CAD-) and 3564 without DM with known CAD (DM-/CAD+). Propensity score matching was used to control for the differences in characteristics between DM+/CAD- and DM-/CAD+ groups. There was comparable MACE in the matched DM+/CAD- and DM-/CAD+ groups (HR 1.15, 95% CI 0.97-1.37). By Chi-square analysis, type of stress (exercise or pharmacologic), total perfusion deficit (TPD), and left ventricular function were the most potent predictors of MACE, followed by CAD and DM status. The combined consideration of mode of stress, TPD, and DM provided synergistic stratification, an 8.87-fold (HR 8.87, 95% CI 7.27-10.82) increase in MACE among pharmacologically stressed patients with DM and TPD > 10% (vs non-ischemic, exercised stressed patients without DM).

CONCLUSIONS

Propensity-matched patients with DM and no known CAD have similar MACE risk compared to patients with known CAD and no DM. DM is synergistic with mode of stress testing and TPD in predicting the risk of cardiac stress test patients.

摘要

背景

糖尿病(DM)在接受心脏应激测试的当代人群中越来越普遍,但它作为主要不良心血管事件(MACE)的预测因子的效力与其他临床变量相比,尚未得到很好的描述。

方法和结果

从接受 SPECT-MPI 的 19658 例患者中,我们确定了 3122 例无已知冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的糖尿病患者(DM+/CAD-)和 3564 例无已知 CAD 的无糖尿病患者(DM-/CAD+)。采用倾向评分匹配来控制 DM+/CAD-和 DM-/CAD+组之间特征的差异。在匹配的 DM+/CAD-和 DM-/CAD+组中,MACE 发生率相当(HR 1.15,95%CI 0.97-1.37)。通过卡方分析,应激类型(运动或药物)、总灌注缺陷(TPD)和左心室功能是 MACE 的最强预测因子,其次是 CAD 和 DM 状态。综合考虑应激方式、TPD 和 DM 提供了协同分层,药物应激且 TPD>10%的糖尿病患者的 MACE 风险增加了 8.87 倍(HR 8.87,95%CI 7.27-10.82)(与非缺血、无 DM 的运动应激患者相比)。

结论

与患有已知 CAD 但无 DM 的患者相比,患有 DM 且无已知 CAD 的倾向评分匹配患者的 MACE 风险相似。DM 与应激测试方式和 TPD 协同预测心脏应激试验患者的风险。

相似文献

2
Coronary risk equivalence of diabetes assessed by SPECT-MPI.SPECT-MPI 评估的糖尿病冠状动脉风险等效性。
J Nucl Cardiol. 2019 Aug;26(4):1093-1102. doi: 10.1007/s12350-017-1114-6. Epub 2017 Dec 6.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验