University of Milano-Bicocca (G.M.), University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Clinica Medica, Department of Medicine and Surgery (R.F., M.B., C.C., G.G.), University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Hypertension. 2021 Dec;78(6):1677-1688. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.121.16489. Epub 2021 Nov 10.
Few issues of modern cardiovascular medicine have been as controversial as the relationship between white-coat hypertension (WCH), that is, a common condition in which office blood pressure is elevated while out-of-office blood pressure (ambulatory blood pressure or home blood pressure) is normal. While earlier studies showed no increased risk of cardiovascular events in WCH compared with the normotensive state, more recent studies have changed this conclusion by showing that an increased cardiovascular risk represents a trait of this hypertensive phenotype. The present article will review a number of issues related to WCH, that is, its definition, pathophysiological background, clinical alterations, and prognostic significance. This will be done by considering the available evidence published during the last decades, with special focus on the data collected in PAMELA (Pressioni Arteriose Monitorate e Loro Associazioni)-a research project performed with a cross-sectional and longitudinal design, which has provided a series of novel clinical information on WCH throughout the years. The final part of the article will discuss the therapeutic implications of the abovementioned evidence, as well as some controversial or still undefined issues related to WCH, whose investigation will be an important goal to pursue by future research.
在现代心血管医学中,几乎没有任何问题像白大衣高血压(WCH)那样具有争议性,即一种常见的情况,即在办公室血压升高,而在办公室外的血压(动态血压或家庭血压)正常。虽然早期的研究表明,WCH 与正常血压状态相比,心血管事件的风险没有增加,但最近的研究改变了这一结论,表明心血管风险增加代表了这种高血压表型的特征。本文将回顾与 WCH 相关的一些问题,即其定义、病理生理背景、临床改变和预后意义。这将通过考虑过去几十年发表的现有证据来完成,特别关注 PAMELA(动脉压监测及其关联)研究项目中收集的数据,该研究项目采用了横断面和纵向设计,多年来提供了一系列关于 WCH 的新临床信息。文章的最后一部分将讨论上述证据的治疗意义,以及与 WCH 相关的一些有争议或仍未定义的问题,对这些问题的研究将是未来研究的一个重要目标。