Suppr超能文献

皮肤伤口拭子和皮肤伤口活检标本的细菌培养结果比较。

Comparison of bacteriologic culture results for skin wound swabs and skin wound biopsy specimens.

机构信息

From the Departments of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843.

Large Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843.

出版信息

J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2021 Dec 15;259(12):1416-1421. doi: 10.2460/javma.20.10.0568.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare bacteriologic culture results for superficial swab and tissue biopsy specimens obtained from dogs with open skin wounds.

ANIMALS

52 client-owned dogs.

PROCEDURES

For each dog, 1 wound underwent routine preparation prior to collection of 2 specimens, 1 by superficial swab (Levine) technique and 1 by tissue biopsy. Specimens were processed for bacteriologic culture. Two observers determined whether any detected difference in culture results for the 2 types of specimen would have resulted in differing treatment plans.

RESULTS

Culture results of swab and tissue biopsy specimens were identical in 11/52 (21.2%) cases. Tissue biopsy specimen and swab cultures yielded positive results for 44 (84.6%) and 40 (76.9%) wounds, respectively. With regard to mean recovery rates of bacteria from wounds with positive culture results, both the biopsy specimens and swabs yielded 3.4 bacterial species/wound. All wounds for which swab cultures yielded no growth also had negative culture results for biopsy specimens. Biopsy specimen and swab culture results were in agreement with regard to the most common bacteria cultured. In 7/52 (13%) wounds, the observers would have treated the patient differently on the basis of the results of the 2 cultures.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Results indicated that culture of a swab collected by the Levine technique is an appropriate noninvasive alternative to culture of a tissue biopsy specimen. A negative result obtained from culture of a swab is likely to be reliable. Disagreement between the results of swab and tissue biopsy specimen cultures is likely of low clinical importance.

摘要

目的

比较从患有开放性皮肤伤口的犬身上采集的表面拭子和组织活检标本的细菌培养结果。

动物

52 只患犬。

操作步骤

每只犬的 1 个伤口在采集 2 个标本前进行常规准备,1 个标本采用表面拭子(Levine)技术采集,另 1 个标本采用组织活检采集。对标本进行细菌培养。2 位观察者判断 2 种标本的培养结果差异是否会导致不同的治疗方案。

结果

在 11/52(21.2%)例中,拭子和组织活检标本的培养结果相同。组织活检标本和拭子培养分别对 44(84.6%)和 40(76.9%)个伤口呈阳性结果。就阳性培养结果的伤口中细菌的平均回收率而言,活检标本和拭子分别培养出 3.4 种/伤口的细菌。所有拭子培养无生长的伤口,其活检标本的培养结果也为阴性。在最常见培养出的细菌方面,活检标本和拭子培养结果一致。在 7/52(13%)个伤口中,观察者可能会根据 2 种培养结果对患者进行不同的治疗。

结论和临床意义

结果表明,采用 Levine 技术采集的拭子培养是一种合适的非侵入性组织活检替代方法。拭子培养阴性结果可能是可靠的。拭子和组织活检标本培养结果之间的差异可能具有较低的临床意义。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验