• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

验证风险评估模型预测中国慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重住院患者静脉血栓栓塞症的价值:一项多中心队列研究。

Validation of Risk Assessment Models Predicting Venous Thromboembolism in Inpatients with Acute Exacerbation Of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Multicenter Cohort Study in China.

机构信息

West China School of Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China.

Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China.

出版信息

Thromb Haemost. 2022 Jul;122(7):1177-1185. doi: 10.1055/a-1693-0063. Epub 2021 Nov 10.

DOI:10.1055/a-1693-0063
PMID:34758489
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Inpatients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) are at increased risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE); however, the prophylaxis for VTE is largely underused in China. Identifying high-risk patients requiring thromboprophylaxis is critical to reduce the mortality and morbidity associated with VTE. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the validities of the Padua Prediction Score and Caprini risk assessment model (RAM) in predicting the risk of VTE in inpatients with AECOPD in China.

METHODS

The inpatients with AECOPD were prospectively enrolled from seven medical centers of China between September 2017 and January 2020. Caprini and Padua scores were calculated on admission, and the incidence of 3-month VTE was investigated.

RESULTS

Among the 3,277 eligible patients with AECOPD, 128 patients (3.9%) developed VTE within 3 months after admission. The distribution of the study population by the Caprini risk level was as follows: high, 53.6%; moderate, 43.0%; and low, 3.5%. The incidence of VTE increased by risk level as high, 6.1%; moderate, 1.5%; and low, 0%. According to the Padua RAM, only 10.9% of the study population was classified as high risk and 89.1% as low risk, with the corresponding incidence of VTE of 7.9 and 3.4%, respectively. The Caprini RAM had higher area under curve compared with the Padua RAM (0.713 ± 0.021 vs. 0.644 ± 0.023,  = 0.029).

CONCLUSION

The Caprini RAM was superior to the Padua RAM in predicting the risk of VTE in inpatients with AECOPD and might better guide thromboprophylaxis in these patients.

摘要

背景

慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重(AECOPD)住院患者发生静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)的风险增加;然而,VTE 的预防措施在中国仍未得到广泛应用。识别需要血栓预防的高危患者对于降低与 VTE 相关的死亡率和发病率至关重要。本研究旨在评估和比较 Padua 预测评分和 Caprini 风险评估模型(RAM)在中国 AECOPD 住院患者中预测 VTE 风险的有效性。

方法

2017 年 9 月至 2020 年 1 月,前瞻性纳入来自中国 7 家医疗中心的 AECOPD 住院患者。入院时计算 Caprini 和 Padua 评分,并调查 3 个月内 VTE 的发生率。

结果

在 3277 例符合条件的 AECOPD 患者中,128 例(3.9%)在入院后 3 个月内发生 VTE。根据 Caprini 风险水平,研究人群的分布如下:高,53.6%;中,43.0%;低,3.5%。VTE 的发生率随风险水平的增加而升高,高风险组为 6.1%,中风险组为 1.5%,低风险组为 0%。根据 Padua RAM,只有 10.9%的研究人群被归类为高风险,89.1%为低风险,相应的 VTE 发生率分别为 7.9%和 3.4%。Caprini RAM 的曲线下面积高于 Padua RAM(0.713±0.021 与 0.644±0.023,=0.029)。

结论

Caprini RAM 预测 AECOPD 住院患者 VTE 风险优于 Padua RAM,可能更好地指导这些患者的血栓预防。

相似文献

1
Validation of Risk Assessment Models Predicting Venous Thromboembolism in Inpatients with Acute Exacerbation Of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Multicenter Cohort Study in China.验证风险评估模型预测中国慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重住院患者静脉血栓栓塞症的价值:一项多中心队列研究。
Thromb Haemost. 2022 Jul;122(7):1177-1185. doi: 10.1055/a-1693-0063. Epub 2021 Nov 10.
2
Superior Predictive Value of D-Dimer to the Padua Prediction Score for Venous Thromboembolism in Inpatients with AECOPD: A Multicenter Cohort Study.慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重住院患者 D-二聚体对 Padua 评分预测静脉血栓栓塞症的优越价值:一项多中心队列研究。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2022 Oct 21;17:2711-2722. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S380418. eCollection 2022.
3
Assessment of the Risk of Venous Thromboembolism in Medical Inpatients using the Padua Prediction Score and Caprini Risk Assessment Model.采用 Padua 预测评分和 Caprini 风险评估模型评估住院患者静脉血栓栓塞风险。
J Atheroscler Thromb. 2018 Nov 1;25(11):1091-1104. doi: 10.5551/jat.43653. Epub 2018 Mar 13.
4
A Prospective Observational Cohort of Clinical Outcomes in Medical Inpatients prescribed Pharmacological Thromboprophylaxis Using Different Clinical Risk Assessment Models(COMPT RAMs).采用不同临床风险评估模型(COMPT RAMs)对住院患者进行药物性血栓预防治疗的前瞻性观察性队列研究的临床结局。
Sci Rep. 2019 Dec 4;9(1):18366. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-54842-3.
5
Derivation and External Validation of a Risk Assessment Model of Venous Thromboembolism in Hospitalized Chinese Patients.中文译文:住院中国患者静脉血栓栓塞风险评估模型的推导和外部验证。
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2023 Jan-Dec;29:10760296221151164. doi: 10.1177/10760296221151164.
6
Comparison between the Khorana prediction score and Caprini risk assessment models for assessing the risk of venous thromboembolism in hospitalized patients with cancer: a retrospective case control study.比较 Khorana 预测评分和 Caprini 风险评估模型在评估住院癌症患者静脉血栓栓塞风险中的应用:一项回顾性病例对照研究。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2020 Oct 1;31(4):454-460. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivaa137.
7
Comparison between Caprini and Padua risk assessment models for hospitalized medical patients at risk for venous thromboembolism: a retrospective study.Caprini与Padua风险评估模型对住院有静脉血栓栓塞风险的内科患者的比较:一项回顾性研究。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2016 Oct;23(4):538-43. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivw158. Epub 2016 Jun 13.
8
Validation of risk assessment models predicting venous thromboembolism in acutely ill medical inpatients: A cohort study.预测急性病内科住院患者静脉血栓栓塞的风险评估模型的验证:一项队列研究。
J Thromb Haemost. 2020 Jun;18(6):1398-1407. doi: 10.1111/jth.14796. Epub 2020 Apr 16.
9
Caprini versus Padua venous thromboembolism risk assessment scores: A comparative study in hospitalized patients at a tertiary center.卡普里尼与帕多瓦静脉血栓栓塞风险评估评分:在一家三级中心住院患者中的比较研究。
Saudi Med J. 2024 Apr;45(4):362-368. doi: 10.15537/smj.2024.45.4.20230954.
10
Ability of Caprini and Padua risk-assessment models to predict venous thromboembolism in a nationwide Veterans Affairs study.Caprini 和 Padua 风险评估模型在全国退伍军人事务研究中预测静脉血栓栓塞的能力。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2024 Mar;12(2):101693. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2023.101693. Epub 2023 Oct 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical characteristics and prognosis prediction in patients with AECOPD and type 2 diabetes mellitus: A multicenter observational study.慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期(AECOPD)合并2型糖尿病患者的临床特征及预后预测:一项多中心观察性研究。
Chron Respir Dis. 2025 Jan-Dec;22:14799731251325251. doi: 10.1177/14799731251325251. Epub 2025 Mar 20.
2
Inflammatory Biomarkers as Predictors of Symptomatic Venous Thromboembolism in Hospitalized Patients with AECOPD: A Multicenter Cohort Study.炎症生物标志物作为慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期住院患者症状性静脉血栓栓塞症的预测指标:一项多中心队列研究
J Atheroscler Thromb. 2025 Apr 1;32(4):439-457. doi: 10.5551/jat.65177. Epub 2024 Oct 30.
3
Development of a Risk Assessment Tool for Venous Thromboembolism among Hospitalized Patients in the ICU.
开发 ICU 住院患者静脉血栓栓塞风险评估工具。
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2024 Jan-Dec;30:10760296241280624. doi: 10.1177/10760296241280624.
4
Risk factors of in-hospital mortality and discriminating capacity of NIVO score in exacerbations of COPD requiring noninvasive ventilation.慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期需要无创通气时院内死亡的危险因素及NIVO评分的鉴别能力
Chron Respir Dis. 2024 Jan-Dec;21:14799731241249474. doi: 10.1177/14799731241249474.
5
Characteristics, treatments, in-hospital and long-term outcomes among inpatients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in China: sex differences in a large cohort study.中国慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期住院患者的特征、治疗、住院及长期结局:一项大型队列研究中的性别差异
BMC Pulm Med. 2024 Mar 11;24(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s12890-024-02948-4.
6
A simple clinical risk score (ABCDMP) for predicting mortality in patients with AECOPD and cardiovascular diseases.一个用于预测 AECOPD 和心血管疾病患者死亡率的简单临床风险评分(ABCDMP)。
Respir Res. 2024 Feb 10;25(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s12931-024-02704-6.
7
A Nomogram Model to Predict Deep Vein Thrombosis Risk After Surgery in Patients with Hip Fractures.一种预测髋部骨折患者术后深静脉血栓形成风险的列线图模型。
Indian J Orthop. 2024 Jan 5;58(2):151-161. doi: 10.1007/s43465-023-01074-3. eCollection 2024 Feb.
8
Padua prediction score may be inappropriate for VTE risk assessment in hospitalized patients with acute respiratory conditions: A Chinese single-center cohort study.帕多瓦预测评分可能不适用于急性呼吸道疾病住院患者的静脉血栓栓塞风险评估:一项中国单中心队列研究。
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2023 Nov 15;49:101301. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2023.101301. eCollection 2023 Dec.
9
Overuse and underuse of thromboprophylaxis in medical inpatients.内科住院患者中血栓预防措施的过度使用和使用不足情况。
Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2023 Aug 23;7(6):102184. doi: 10.1016/j.rpth.2023.102184. eCollection 2023 Aug.
10
Automating venous thromboembolism risk assessment: a dual-branch deep learning method using electronic medical records.自动化静脉血栓栓塞风险评估:一种使用电子病历的双分支深度学习方法。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Aug 10;10:1237616. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1237616. eCollection 2023.