Adjunct Faculty, Faculty of Nursing, University of Prince Edward Island, Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, Canada
Faculty of Nursing, University of Prince Edward Island, Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, Canada.
BMJ Open. 2021 Nov 10;11(11):e050284. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050284.
To examine the extent and nature of evidence on the use of the environmental scan (ES) in the health services delivery literature.
Scoping review.
This scoping review followed the five-stage scoping review methodology outlined by Khalil . A Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies was completed. Seven electronic databases and the grey literature were searched. Pairs of researchers independently performed two levels of screening and data extraction. Data were analysed using qualitative content and thematic analysis.
Ninety-six studies were included in the scoping review. Researchers conducted ESs for many purposes, the most common being to examine the current state of programmes, services or policies. Recommendations were informed by ESs in 20% of studies. Most common data collection methods were literature review (71%), key informant or semistructured interviews (46%) and surveys (35%). Over half (53%) of the studies used a combination of passive (looking at information eg, literature, policies, guidelines) and active (looking for information eg, surveys, interviews) approaches to data collection. Person sources of data (eg, healthcare stakeholders, community representatives) and non-person sources of data (eg, documents, electronic databases, the web) were drawn on to a similar extent. The thematic analysis of the definitions/descriptions yielded several themes including instrument of discovery, knowledge synthesis, forward-looking and decision making. Research gaps identified included absence of a standard definition, inconsistencies in terminology and lack of guiding frameworks in the health services delivery context.
ESs were conducted to gather evidence and to help inform decision making on a range of policy and health services delivery issues across the continuum of care. Consistency in terminology, a consensus definition and more guidance on ES design may help provide structure for researchers and other stakeholders, and ultimately advance ES as a methodological approach. A working definition of ES in a health services delivery context is presented.
考察卫生服务提供文献中环境扫描(ES)使用的证据的范围和性质。
范围综述。
本范围综述遵循 Khalil 概述的五步范围综述方法。完成了同行评审电子搜索策略。七个电子数据库和灰色文献进行了搜索。研究人员对两个层次的筛选和数据提取进行了独立的配对。使用定性内容和主题分析对数据进行分析。
96 项研究纳入范围综述。研究人员进行 ES 的目的很多,最常见的是检查方案、服务或政策的当前状态。20%的研究报告提出了基于 ES 的建议。最常见的数据收集方法是文献综述(71%)、关键信息提供者或半结构化访谈(46%)和调查(35%)。超过一半(53%)的研究使用被动(查看信息,例如文献、政策、指南)和主动(寻找信息,例如调查、访谈)方法相结合的数据收集方法。数据的人员来源(例如医疗保健利益相关者、社区代表)和非人员来源(例如文件、电子数据库、网络)的使用程度相似。对定义/描述的主题分析产生了几个主题,包括发现工具、知识综合、前瞻性和决策制定。确定的研究空白包括缺乏标准定义、术语不一致以及在卫生服务提供背景下缺乏指导框架。
进行 ES 是为了收集证据,并帮助在整个护理连续体上就一系列政策和卫生服务提供问题做出决策。术语的一致性、共识定义和对 ES 设计的更多指导可能有助于为研究人员和其他利益相关者提供结构,并最终推进 ES 作为一种方法。提出了卫生服务提供背景下 ES 的工作定义。