• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用Kedo-SG蓝色、Kedo-SH和往复式手动K锉评估下颌乳磨牙的根管充填质量和预备时间:一项双盲随机对照试验。

Assessing quality of obturation and instrumentation time using Kedo-SG blue, Kedo-SH, and reciprocating hand K-files in primary mandibular molars: A double-blinded randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Sruthi S, Jeevanandan Ganesh, Govindaraju Lavanya, Subramanian Emg

机构信息

Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

出版信息

Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2021 Sep 25;18:76. doi: 10.4103/1735-3327.326649. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.4103/1735-3327.326649
PMID:34760067
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8543121/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pulpectomy is the treatment of choice for severely infected primary molars. The aim of the study is to evaluate the instrumentation time and obturation quality using Kedo SG blue, Kedo SH, and reciprocating hand K files in primary mandibular molars. To evaluate the instrumentation time and obturation quality using Kedo-SG blue, Kedo-SH, and reciprocating hand K-files in primary mandibular molars.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A double-blinded randomized controlled trial was conducted on 45 mandibular molars and were randomly assigned to three experimental groups ( = 15). Group I was instrumented using Kedo-SG blue pediatric rotary files, Group II with Kedo-SH pediatric hand files, and Group III with reciprocating hand K-files. Standardized digital radiographs were taken before and after root canal instrumentation. Root canal preparation time was also recorded. Statistical analysis of the obtained data was done using SPSS software version 17.0. An intergroup comparison of the instrumentation time and the quality of obturation were done using ANOVA and Chi-square test with the level of significance set at 5%. < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

No significant differences were noted with regard to the quality of obturation between the three groups ( < 0.14). However, a statistically significant difference was noted in the instrumentation time between the three groups ( = 0.000). Kedo-SG blue rotary file had significantly lesser instrumentation time when compared to that of Kedo-SH hand files and reciprocating hand K-files.

CONCLUSION

On comparative evaluation,Kedo-SG blue pediatric rotary file showed a marked reduction in instrumentation time, followed by Kedo-SH pediatric hand files and reciprocating hand K-files.

摘要

背景

牙髓摘除术是重度感染的乳磨牙的首选治疗方法。本研究的目的是评估使用Kedo SG蓝色锉、Kedo SH锉和往复式手动K锉对下颌乳磨牙进行根管预备的时间和充填质量。

材料与方法

对45颗下颌乳磨牙进行双盲随机对照试验,并随机分为三个试验组(每组 = 15)。第一组使用Kedo - SG蓝色儿童旋转锉进行根管预备,第二组使用Kedo - SH儿童手动锉,第三组使用往复式手动K锉。在根管预备前后拍摄标准化数字X线片。同时记录根管预备时间。使用SPSS 17.0软件对所得数据进行统计分析。采用方差分析和卡方检验对根管预备时间和充填质量进行组间比较,显著性水平设定为5%。P < 0.05被认为具有统计学意义。

结果

三组之间在充填质量方面未观察到显著差异(P < 0.14)。然而,三组在根管预备时间上存在统计学显著差异(P = 0.000)。与Kedo - SH手动锉和往复式手动K锉相比,Kedo - SG蓝色旋转锉的根管预备时间明显更短。

结论

通过比较评估,Kedo - SG蓝色儿童旋转锉的根管预备时间显著缩短,其次是Kedo - SH儿童手动锉和往复式手动K锉。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f25/8543121/030bcdbf0da5/DRJ-18-76-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f25/8543121/bac86ea9dd48/DRJ-18-76-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f25/8543121/030bcdbf0da5/DRJ-18-76-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f25/8543121/bac86ea9dd48/DRJ-18-76-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f25/8543121/030bcdbf0da5/DRJ-18-76-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessing quality of obturation and instrumentation time using Kedo-SG blue, Kedo-SH, and reciprocating hand K-files in primary mandibular molars: A double-blinded randomized controlled trial.使用Kedo-SG蓝色、Kedo-SH和往复式手动K锉评估下颌乳磨牙的根管充填质量和预备时间:一项双盲随机对照试验。
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2021 Sep 25;18:76. doi: 10.4103/1735-3327.326649. eCollection 2021.
2
Clinical evaluation of instrumentation time and quality of obturation using paediatric hand and rotary file systems with conventional hand K-files for pulpectomy in primary mandibular molars: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial.使用儿童手动和旋转锉系统与传统手动K锉进行下颌乳磨牙牙髓摘除术时的操作时间及根管充填质量的临床评估:一项双盲随机对照试验
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2020 Dec;21(6):693-701. doi: 10.1007/s40368-020-00518-w. Epub 2020 Mar 17.
3
Evaluation of the Efficiency to Remove the Infected Dentin Bacterial Count and to Adequately Shape the Canal Using Hand Kedo-SH Files, Rotary Kedo-SG (Blue) and Pro AF Baby Gold Files in Primary Molars: An Study.使用手动Kedo-SH锉、旋转Kedo-SG(蓝色)锉和Pro AF Baby Gold锉对乳牙感染牙本质细菌计数的清除效率及根管适当塑形的评估:一项研究。
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2023 Sep;16(Suppl 2):142-148. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2652.
4
Comparative Evaluation of Quality of Obturation and Its Effect on Postoperative Pain between Pediatric Hand and Rotary Files: A Double-blinded Randomized Controlled Trial.儿童手动锉与旋转锉根管充填质量及其对术后疼痛影响的比较评价:一项双盲随机对照试验
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2021 Jan-Feb;14(1):88-96. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1895.
5
Clinical comparison of Kedo-S paediatric rotary files vs manual instrumentation for root canal preparation in primary molars: a double blinded randomised clinical trial.Kedo-S儿童旋转锉与手动器械用于乳磨牙根管预备的临床比较:一项双盲随机临床试验
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2018 Aug;19(4):273-278. doi: 10.1007/s40368-018-0356-6. Epub 2018 Jul 12.
6
Evaluation of Quality of Obturation Using Two Different Rotary Files and Hand Files in Primary Teeth: A Randomized Controlled Trial.使用两种不同旋转锉和手用锉评估乳牙根管充填质量:一项随机对照试验
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2021 Jul-Aug;14(4):471-474. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1990.
7
Comparison of instrumentation time and obturation quality between hand K-file, H-files, and rotary Kedo-S in root canal treatment of primary teeth: A randomized controlled trial.手用K锉、H锉和旋转Kedo-S在乳牙根管治疗中器械操作时间和充填质量的比较:一项随机对照试验
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2019 Jan-Mar;37(1):75-79. doi: 10.4103/JISPPD.JISPPD_72_18.
8
Assessment of Quality of Obturation, Instrumentation Time and Intensity of Pain with Pediatric Rotary File (Kedo-S) in Primary Anterior Teeth: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.使用儿童旋转锉(Kedo-S)对乳前牙根管充填质量、预备时间及疼痛强度的评估:一项随机对照临床试验
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2018 Nov-Dec;11(6):462-467. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1558.
9
Comparative evaluation of clinical efficacy and volumetric changes in pulpectomized primary molars using hand K-file, ProTaper rotary file, and Kedo-SG blue file: an cone beam computed tomography analysis.手用 K 锉、ProTaper 机用镍钛锉和 Kedo-SG 蓝锉在乳牙根管治疗中临床疗效和体积变化的比较评价:锥形束 CT 分析。
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2024 Sep;48(5):95-101. doi: 10.22514/jocpd.2024.108. Epub 2024 Sep 3.
10
Comparison of quality of obturation and post-operative pain using manual vs rotary files in primary teeth - A randomised clinical trial.使用手动锉与旋转锉对乳牙进行根管充填的质量及术后疼痛比较——一项随机临床试验
Indian J Dent Res. 2019 Nov-Dec;30(6):904-908. doi: 10.4103/ijdr.IJDR_37_18.

引用本文的文献

1
Cleaning Effectiveness and Postoperative Pain Associated With Rotary Instrumentation in Primary Teeth: An Umbrella Review of Systematic Evidence.乳牙旋转器械预备的清洁效果及术后疼痛:系统证据的伞状综述
Cureus. 2025 Jul 6;17(7):e87369. doi: 10.7759/cureus.87369. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
An Evaluation of Postoperative Pain after Root Canal Instrumentation Using Manual K-files and Kedo-S Rotary files in Primary Molars.使用手动K锉和Kedo-S旋转锉对乳磨牙进行根管预备后的术后疼痛评估
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024 Feb;16(Suppl 1):S136-S139. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_420_23. Epub 2023 Nov 7.
3
Comparative Evaluation of Single Rotary File System and Sequential Multi-file Rotary Systems on Time for Biomechanical Preparation and Obturation Quality in Single-visit Pulpectomy Protocol: A Double-blind Randomized Clinical Trial.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical evaluation of instrumentation time and quality of obturation using paediatric hand and rotary file systems with conventional hand K-files for pulpectomy in primary mandibular molars: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial.使用儿童手动和旋转锉系统与传统手动K锉进行下颌乳磨牙牙髓摘除术时的操作时间及根管充填质量的临床评估:一项双盲随机对照试验
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2020 Dec;21(6):693-701. doi: 10.1007/s40368-020-00518-w. Epub 2020 Mar 17.
2
Comparison of instrumentation time and obturation quality between hand K-file, H-files, and rotary Kedo-S in root canal treatment of primary teeth: A randomized controlled trial.手用K锉、H锉和旋转Kedo-S在乳牙根管治疗中器械操作时间和充填质量的比较:一项随机对照试验
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2019 Jan-Mar;37(1):75-79. doi: 10.4103/JISPPD.JISPPD_72_18.
3
单访根管治疗方案中单次旋转锉系统与顺序多锉旋转系统在生物力学预备时间和充填质量方面的比较评价:一项双盲随机临床试验
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2023 Nov;16(Suppl 3):247-252. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2685.
4
Comparative Evaluation of Instrumentation Time and Quality of Obturation amongst Pediatric Rotary Endodontic System: An Study.儿童旋转牙髓治疗系统根管预备时间与充填质量的比较评估:一项研究。
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2023 Mar-Apr;16(2):338-343. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2573.
Clinical comparison of Kedo-S paediatric rotary files vs manual instrumentation for root canal preparation in primary molars: a double blinded randomised clinical trial.Kedo-S儿童旋转锉与手动器械用于乳磨牙根管预备的临床比较:一项双盲随机临床试验
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2018 Aug;19(4):273-278. doi: 10.1007/s40368-018-0356-6. Epub 2018 Jul 12.
4
Clinical Evaluation of Quality of Obturation and Instrumentation Time using Two Modified Rotary File Systems with Manual Instrumentation in Primary Teeth.使用两种改良旋转锉系统与手动器械对乳牙进行根管充填质量和器械操作时间的临床评估
J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 Sep;11(9):ZC55-ZC58. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/30069.10602. Epub 2017 Sep 1.
5
Comparison of quality of obturation and instrumentation time using hand files and two rotary file systems in primary molars: A single-blinded randomized controlled trial.使用手动锉和两种旋转锉系统对乳磨牙进行根管充填质量和预备时间的比较:一项单盲随机对照试验。
Eur J Dent. 2017 Jul-Sep;11(3):376-379. doi: 10.4103/ejd.ejd_345_16.
6
Kedo-S Paediatric Rotary Files for Root Canal Preparation in Primary Teeth - Case Report.用于乳牙根管预备的Kedo-S儿童旋转锉——病例报告
J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 Mar;11(3):ZR03-ZR05. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/25856.9508. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
7
Effectiveness of Rotary Endodontic Instruments on Smear Layer Removal in Root Canals of Primary Teeth: A Scanning Electron Microscopy Study.旋转式牙髓治疗器械对乳牙根管内玷污层去除效果的扫描电子显微镜研究
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2016;40(2):141-6. doi: 10.17796/1053-4628-40.2.141.
8
Evaluation of the efficacy of rotary vs. hand files in root canal preparation of primary teeth in vitro using CBCT.使用CBCT在体外评估旋转锉与手动锉在乳牙根管预备中的疗效。
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2014 Apr;15(2):113-20. doi: 10.1007/s40368-013-0072-1. Epub 2013 Jul 27.
9
Comparison between rotary and manual techniques on duration of instrumentation and obturation times in primary teeth.乳牙根管预备和充填时间的旋转技术与手动技术比较。
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2011 Summer;35(4):359-63. doi: 10.17796/jcpd.35.4.8k013k21t39245n8.
10
In vitro comparison of NiTi rotary instruments and stainless steel hand instruments in root canal preparations of primary and permanent molar.镍钛旋转器械与不锈钢手动器械在乳牙和恒牙磨牙根管预备中的体外比较
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2006 Dec;24(4):186-91. doi: 10.4103/0970-4388.28075.