• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Kedo-S儿童旋转锉与手动器械用于乳磨牙根管预备的临床比较:一项双盲随机临床试验

Clinical comparison of Kedo-S paediatric rotary files vs manual instrumentation for root canal preparation in primary molars: a double blinded randomised clinical trial.

作者信息

Jeevanandan G, Govindaraju L

机构信息

Department of Paediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

出版信息

Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2018 Aug;19(4):273-278. doi: 10.1007/s40368-018-0356-6. Epub 2018 Jul 12.

DOI:10.1007/s40368-018-0356-6
PMID:30003514
Abstract

AIM

This was to compare and evaluate the instrumentation time and quality of obturation between paediatric rotary file (Kedo-S) and manual instrumentation techniques in primary molars.

METHODS

A double blinded randomised control trial was performed that included mandibular primary molars in children of age 4-7 years with pulp necrosis. Sixty primary mandibular molars were randomly divided into two groups: 30 were instrumented with paediatric rotary files Kedo-S (experimental group) and 30 with hand K-files (control group). During the preparation of the primary root canals the instrumentation time was recorded in seconds. The quality of obturation was recorded as optimal, under filled or over filled using immediate post-operative radiographs. The instrumentation time and quality of obturation were analysed using independent t-test and Chi-square test.

RESULTS

Mean instrumentation time with paediatric rotary files Kedo-S (78.53 s) was significantly less than K-files (95.46 s) (p < 0.05). There was a significant improvement in the quality of obturation (p < 0.05) with paediatric rotary files (Kedo-S).

CONCLUSION

Clinical use of paediatric rotary files Kedo-S was effective during root canal preparation of primary teeth with reduction in instrumentation time and better quality of obturation.

摘要

目的

比较和评估儿童旋转锉(Kedo-S)与手动器械预备技术在乳磨牙根管预备中的操作时间及充填质量。

方法

进行一项双盲随机对照试验,纳入4至7岁患有牙髓坏死的儿童的下颌乳磨牙。60颗下颌乳磨牙随机分为两组:30颗用儿童旋转锉Kedo-S进行预备(试验组),30颗用手动K锉进行预备(对照组)。在预备乳牙根管过程中,记录操作时间(以秒为单位)。使用术后即刻X线片将充填质量记录为恰填、欠填或超填。采用独立t检验和卡方检验分析操作时间和充填质量。

结果

儿童旋转锉Kedo-S的平均操作时间(78.53秒)显著短于K锉(95.46秒)(p < 0.05)。使用儿童旋转锉(Kedo-S)时,充填质量有显著改善(p < 0.05)。

结论

儿童旋转锉Kedo-S在乳牙根管预备中临床应用有效,可减少操作时间并提高充填质量。

相似文献

1
Clinical comparison of Kedo-S paediatric rotary files vs manual instrumentation for root canal preparation in primary molars: a double blinded randomised clinical trial.Kedo-S儿童旋转锉与手动器械用于乳磨牙根管预备的临床比较:一项双盲随机临床试验
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2018 Aug;19(4):273-278. doi: 10.1007/s40368-018-0356-6. Epub 2018 Jul 12.
2
Clinical evaluation of instrumentation time and quality of obturation using paediatric hand and rotary file systems with conventional hand K-files for pulpectomy in primary mandibular molars: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial.使用儿童手动和旋转锉系统与传统手动K锉进行下颌乳磨牙牙髓摘除术时的操作时间及根管充填质量的临床评估:一项双盲随机对照试验
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2020 Dec;21(6):693-701. doi: 10.1007/s40368-020-00518-w. Epub 2020 Mar 17.
3
Comparison of quality of obturation and post-operative pain using manual vs rotary files in primary teeth - A randomised clinical trial.使用手动锉与旋转锉对乳牙进行根管充填的质量及术后疼痛比较——一项随机临床试验
Indian J Dent Res. 2019 Nov-Dec;30(6):904-908. doi: 10.4103/ijdr.IJDR_37_18.
4
Assessing quality of obturation and instrumentation time using Kedo-SG blue, Kedo-SH, and reciprocating hand K-files in primary mandibular molars: A double-blinded randomized controlled trial.使用Kedo-SG蓝色、Kedo-SH和往复式手动K锉评估下颌乳磨牙的根管充填质量和预备时间:一项双盲随机对照试验。
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2021 Sep 25;18:76. doi: 10.4103/1735-3327.326649. eCollection 2021.
5
Comparison of instrumentation time and obturation quality between hand K-file, H-files, and rotary Kedo-S in root canal treatment of primary teeth: A randomized controlled trial.手用K锉、H锉和旋转Kedo-S在乳牙根管治疗中器械操作时间和充填质量的比较:一项随机对照试验
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2019 Jan-Mar;37(1):75-79. doi: 10.4103/JISPPD.JISPPD_72_18.
6
Comparison of post-operative pain after root canal instrumentation with hand K-files, H-files and rotary Kedo-S files in primary teeth: a randomised clinical trial.乳牙根管预备中使用手动K锉、H锉和旋转Kedo-S锉术后疼痛的比较:一项随机临床试验
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2019 Oct;20(5):467-472. doi: 10.1007/s40368-019-00429-5. Epub 2019 Mar 12.
7
Comparative evaluation of clinical efficacy and volumetric changes in pulpectomized primary molars using hand K-file, ProTaper rotary file, and Kedo-SG blue file: an cone beam computed tomography analysis.手用 K 锉、ProTaper 机用镍钛锉和 Kedo-SG 蓝锉在乳牙根管治疗中临床疗效和体积变化的比较评价:锥形束 CT 分析。
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2024 Sep;48(5):95-101. doi: 10.22514/jocpd.2024.108. Epub 2024 Sep 3.
8
Assessment of Quality of Obturation, Instrumentation Time and Intensity of Pain with Pediatric Rotary File (Kedo-S) in Primary Anterior Teeth: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.使用儿童旋转锉(Kedo-S)对乳前牙根管充填质量、预备时间及疼痛强度的评估:一项随机对照临床试验
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2018 Nov-Dec;11(6):462-467. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1558.
9
Assessment of clinical and radiographic efficiency of manual and pediatric rotary file systems in primary root canal preparation: a randomized controlled clinical trial.评价手动和儿童机用旋转锉系统在儿童乳牙根管预备中的临床和影像学效果:一项随机对照临床试验。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Sep 23;23(1):687. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03393-1.
10
Evaluation of rotary file system (Kedo-S-Square) in root canal preparation of primary anterior teeth using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)-in vitro study.使用锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)评估恒牙前牙根管预备的旋转锉系统(Kedo-S-Square):体外研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2022 Jan 18;22(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-02021-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Cleaning Effectiveness and Postoperative Pain Associated With Rotary Instrumentation in Primary Teeth: An Umbrella Review of Systematic Evidence.乳牙旋转器械预备的清洁效果及术后疼痛:系统证据的伞状综述
Cureus. 2025 Jul 6;17(7):e87369. doi: 10.7759/cureus.87369. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Clinical and radiographic outcomes of pulpectomy in primary teeth using two rotary file systems compared with manual files: a cost-effectiveness analysis.使用两种旋转锉系统与手动锉相比进行乳牙牙髓摘除术的临床和影像学结果:成本效益分析
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Jul 4;25(1):1093. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06508-y.
3
Different outcomes of rotary and manual instrumentation in primary teeth pulpectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Kedo-S Paediatric Rotary Files for Root Canal Preparation in Primary Teeth - Case Report.用于乳牙根管预备的Kedo-S儿童旋转锉——病例报告
J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 Mar;11(3):ZR03-ZR05. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/25856.9508. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
2
Effectiveness of Rotary Endodontic Instruments on Smear Layer Removal in Root Canals of Primary Teeth: A Scanning Electron Microscopy Study.旋转式牙髓治疗器械对乳牙根管内玷污层去除效果的扫描电子显微镜研究
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2016;40(2):141-6. doi: 10.17796/1053-4628-40.2.141.
3
Computed Tomographic Evaluation of K3 Rotary and Stainless Steel K File Instrumentation in Primary Teeth.
乳牙牙髓切断术中旋转器械与手动器械操作的不同结果:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2025 Mar 24. doi: 10.1007/s40368-025-01020-x.
4
Comparison of Hand Files, Mtwo, Reciproc, and Gentlefile Rotary Systems Regarding Canal Transportation, Centering Ability, and Obturation Quality of Primary Molars.手用锉、Mtwo、Reciproc和Gentlefile旋转系统在乳牙根管偏移、定心能力和充填质量方面的比较
J Dent (Shiraz). 2025 Mar 1;26(1):76-87. doi: 10.30476/dentjods.2024.100763.2247. eCollection 2025 Mar.
5
Comparison of volumetric analysis between conventional and rotary files in the preparation of root canals in primary molars-an study.传统锉与旋转锉在乳磨牙根管预备中体积分析的比较——一项研究
Front Dent Med. 2024 Dec 24;5:1489074. doi: 10.3389/fdmed.2024.1489074. eCollection 2024.
6
Evaluation and Comparison of Dentin Thickness, Centering Ability, Canal Transportation, and Instrumentation Time of Pro AF Baby Gold and Pedoflex Files in Primary Root Canals Using a Cone Beam Computed Tomographic Analysis: An Study.使用锥形束计算机断层扫描分析评估和比较Pro AF Baby Gold锉和Pedoflex锉在乳牙根管中的牙本质厚度、定心能力、根管偏移及预备时间:一项研究
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2024 Aug;17(8):892-897. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2929.
7
Knowledge, Awareness, and Use of Stainless-Steel Crowns Among Dental Professionals in Sana'a City, Yemen.也门萨那市牙科专业人员对不锈钢冠的认识、了解和使用情况。
Med Sci Monit. 2024 Sep 23;30:e945948. doi: 10.12659/MSM.945948.
8
Comparison of cyclic fatigue resistance of four pediatric rotary file systems at body temperature: an in vitro study.四种儿童用高速手机在体温下的抗疲劳性能比较:一项体外研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Aug 23;24(1):992. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04739-z.
9
Comparative Evaluation of Clinical Instrumentation Time and Quality of Obturation of Two Different Pedo Rotary File Systems in Primary Mandibular Molars: An Study.两种不同儿童旋转锉系统在乳牙下颌第一磨牙中的临床操作时间及根管充填质量的比较评估:一项研究。
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2024 Mar;17(3):303-306. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2806.
10
Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of shaping ability of kedo-S square and fanta AF™ baby rotary files compared to manual K-files in root canal preparation of primary anterior teeth.使用 Cone-beam computed tomography 评估在儿童前牙根管预备中,kedo-S square 和 fanta AF™ baby 旋转锉与手动 K 锉相比的成形能力。
Clin Oral Investig. 2024 May 27;28(6):340. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05726-y.
计算机断层扫描评估K3旋转器械和不锈钢K锉在乳牙根管治疗中的应用
J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 Jan;10(1):ZC05-8. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/14183.7028. Epub 2016 Jan 1.
4
Evaluation of the efficacy of rotary vs. hand files in root canal preparation of primary teeth in vitro using CBCT.使用CBCT在体外评估旋转锉与手动锉在乳牙根管预备中的疗效。
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2014 Apr;15(2):113-20. doi: 10.1007/s40368-013-0072-1. Epub 2013 Jul 27.
5
Comparison between rotary and manual techniques on duration of instrumentation and obturation times in primary teeth.乳牙根管预备和充填时间的旋转技术与手动技术比较。
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2011 Summer;35(4):359-63. doi: 10.17796/jcpd.35.4.8k013k21t39245n8.
6
Comparison between rotary and manual instrumentation in primary teeth.乳牙旋转器械与手动器械的比较。
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2008 Summer;32(4):295-8. doi: 10.17796/jcpd.32.4.l57l36355u606576.
7
In vitro comparison of NiTi rotary instruments and stainless steel hand instruments in root canal preparations of primary and permanent molar.镍钛旋转器械与不锈钢手动器械在乳牙和恒牙磨牙根管预备中的体外比较
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2006 Dec;24(4):186-91. doi: 10.4103/0970-4388.28075.
8
Pulpotomy in primary teeth: review of the literature according to standardized criteria.乳牙活髓切断术:根据标准化标准对文献的综述
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2006 Jun;7(2):64-71; discussion 72. doi: 10.1007/BF03320817.
9
Comparison of rotary and manual instrumentation techniques on cleaning capacity and instrumentation time in deciduous molars.乳牙磨牙旋转与手动器械预备技术在清洁能力和器械预备时间方面的比较。
J Dent Child (Chic). 2004 Jan-Apr;71(1):45-7.
10
The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials: explanation and elaboration.报告随机试验的修订版CONSORT声明:解释与详述。
Ann Intern Med. 2001 Apr 17;134(8):663-94. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-134-8-200104170-00012.