Suppr超能文献

产科超声检查中的干扰因素:超声检查医师是否存在安全顾虑?

Distractors in obstetric ultrasound: Do sonographers have safety concerns?

作者信息

Najafzadeh Afrooz, Woodrow Nicole, Thoirs Kerry

机构信息

Global Diagnostics Australia Peel Health Campus 110 Lakes Road Mandurah Western Australia 6210 Australia.

School of Health Medical and Applied Sciences The Central Queensland University Perth campus 110 William Street Perth Western Australia 6000 Australia.

出版信息

Australas J Ultrasound Med. 2019 Feb 23;22(3):206-213. doi: 10.1002/ajum.12134. eCollection 2019 Aug.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Obstetric sonography is a highly skilled diagnostic medical examination. Pregnant women like to socialise their ultrasound experience with family, introducing distractions for the sonographer. Our objective was to survey ultrasound practitioners to identify concerns regarding interruptions and their opinions about socialisation during the examination.

METHODS

An online questionnaire was disseminated to study the views of Australian and New Zealand obstetric sonographers/sonologists. It was informed by a pilot study of possible distractors with quality and safety concerns and operator opinions regarding family bonding.

RESULTS

The opinions of 393 obstetric sonographers/sonologists informed our results. Distractors with the most negative aspects included disruptive children (93.3%) and mobile phone conversations (84.3%). Most respondents (62%) believed that a distractor only had to be present for 5 min or less to have an impact. Small children were identified by 87.5% of respondents as safety risks to themselves, to the patient and to sonographers. Sonographers were concerned that distractors caused a loss of concentration, interruption to a systematic scanning approach and increased false negatives in screening, missing important diagnoses. Sonographers strongly agreed that obstetric sonography facilitated maternal-fetal bonding, but only 15% thought that siblings bond with the fetus during the scan.

CONCLUSION

Obstetric sonographers in our study are concerned that distractors pose a negative impact on the quality and safety of ultrasound. They also recognise the importance of family bonding. Strategies to bridge the medical and social components of obstetric sonography should be developed to reduce quality and safety threats.

摘要

引言

产科超声检查是一项技术要求很高的诊断性医学检查。孕妇喜欢与家人分享她们的超声检查经历,这会分散超声检查人员的注意力。我们的目的是调查超声检查从业者,以确定他们对检查过程中干扰因素的担忧以及他们对检查期间社交行为的看法。

方法

通过在线问卷来研究澳大利亚和新西兰产科超声检查人员/超声科医生的观点。该问卷是基于一项初步研究制定的,该研究涉及可能存在质量和安全问题的干扰因素以及操作人员对家庭关系的看法。

结果

393名产科超声检查人员/超声科医生的意见为我们的研究结果提供了依据。负面影响最大的干扰因素包括吵闹的孩子(93.3%)和手机通话(84.3%)。大多数受访者(62%)认为,干扰因素只要出现5分钟或更短时间就会产生影响。87.5%的受访者认为小孩子对自己、患者和超声检查人员都存在安全风险。超声检查人员担心干扰因素会导致注意力不集中、中断系统的扫描方法,并增加筛查中的假阴性结果,从而漏诊重要病症。超声检查人员强烈认同产科超声检查有助于母婴建立情感联系,但只有15%的人认为兄弟姐妹在扫描过程中能与胎儿建立情感联系。

结论

我们研究中的产科超声检查人员担心干扰因素会对超声检查的质量和安全产生负面影响。他们也认识到家庭情感联系的重要性。应该制定策略来平衡产科超声检查的医学和社会因素,以减少对质量和安全的威胁。

相似文献

3
Prenatal screening for fetal aneuploidy in singleton pregnancies.单胎妊娠胎儿非整倍体的产前筛查。
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2011 Jul;33(7):736-750. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)34961-1.

本文引用的文献

3
Radiology Workflow Disruptors: A Detailed Analysis.放射学工作流程干扰因素:详细分析
J Am Coll Radiol. 2016 Oct;13(10):1210-1214. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2016.04.009. Epub 2016 Jun 14.
6
Interruptions and distractions in healthcare: review and reappraisal.医疗保健中的干扰与分心:综述与重新评估
Qual Saf Health Care. 2010 Aug;19(4):304-12. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2009.033282. Epub 2010 Apr 8.
7
A concept analysis of the phenomenon interruption.“中断”现象的概念分析
ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 2007 Jan-Mar;30(1):E26-42. doi: 10.1097/00012272-200701000-00012.
9
Perception research in medical imaging.医学成像中的感知研究。
Br J Radiol. 2005 Aug;78(932):683-5. doi: 10.1259/bjr/72087985.
10
Scanning for pleasure.为愉悦而扫描。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Dec;14(6):369-71. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1999.14060369.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验