Suppr超能文献

在培训急诊医生使用被动抬腿法进行颈动脉多普勒检查时,既往的超声检查经验会影响扫描时间和操作能力吗?

In training emergency physicians the carotid artery Doppler with passive leg raise, does previous sonographic experience influence scan time and competency?

作者信息

Osgood Robert, Mohan Sangeeth, John Lisa, Stirling Erin, Stirling Scott

机构信息

Emergency Department Metro South Health Logan Hospital Meadowbrook Queensland Australia.

Emergency Centre Ramsay Health Greenslopes Hospital Greenslopes Queensland Australia.

出版信息

Australas J Ultrasound Med. 2020 Apr 16;24(1):20-26. doi: 10.1002/ajum.12204. eCollection 2021 Feb.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Determination of fluid responsiveness (FR) associated with intravascular fluid resuscitation in hypotensive patients poses a challenge, with current best evidence methods fraught with poor retest reliability and difficulty in image acquisition (Osman, 2007; 35: 64; Marik, 2009; 37: 2642). Doppler carotid blood flow with passive leg raise (PLR) is a recent modality for determining FR (Marik, 2013; 143: 364).

PURPOSE

This study aimed to determine whether emergency physicians with limited ultrasound experience can reliably acquire this skill.

METHOD

This prospective study recruited 60 emergency physicians with varying experience, who underwent a 3-step learning programme. Participants performed carotid velocity time integral (VTi) Doppler on healthy subjects, followed by repeat measurements in the PLR position. A 16-point checklist and time recorded were assessed for each sonographer, with each participant completing a post-study questionnaire to evaluate perceived competence and ease of skill acquisition.

RESULTS

Of the 60 emergency physicians recruited, 37 (61.6%) were inexperienced and 23 (38.4%) were experienced. Against the 16-point assessment, 61% completed assessment without any errors. Fifty-six out of 60 (94.3%) completed the assessment to acceptable standard with errors recognised and corrected, and four participants (6.7%) made critical errors without correction (Figure 1). Average (±SEM) total scan time was 4:52 ± 0:19, with no significant difference found between inexperienced and experienced groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated feasibility to train emergency physicians, demonstrating that average FR assessment was obtained within 5 min, with no difference between prior experience in scan quality/time taken. 94% completed the scan to acceptable standards, demonstrating ease of carotid Doppler flow with PLR to provide critical information in management of the hypotensive patient.

摘要

背景

对于低血压患者,确定与血管内液体复苏相关的液体反应性(FR)颇具挑战,当前最佳证据方法存在重测可靠性差和图像采集困难的问题(奥斯曼,2007年;35:64;马里克,2009年;37:2642)。被动抬腿(PLR)时的多普勒颈动脉血流是一种用于确定FR的新方法(马里克,2013年;143:364)。

目的

本研究旨在确定超声经验有限的急诊医生能否可靠地掌握这项技能。

方法

这项前瞻性研究招募了60名经验各异的急诊医生,他们接受了一个三步学习计划。参与者先对健康受试者进行颈动脉速度时间积分(VTi)多普勒检查,然后在PLR体位下重复测量。对每位超声检查者评估一份16项检查表并记录时间,每位参与者完成一份研究后问卷,以评估自我感知的能力和技能获取的难易程度。

结果

在招募的60名急诊医生中,37名(61.6%)经验不足,23名(38.4%)经验丰富。根据16项评估,61%的人完成评估时无任何错误。60人中有56人(94.3%)在识别并纠正错误后完成了可接受标准的评估,4名参与者(6.7%)出现严重错误未得到纠正(图1)。平均(±标准误)总扫描时间为4:52 ± 0:19,经验不足组和经验丰富组之间未发现显著差异。

结论

本研究证明了培训急诊医生的可行性,表明平均在5分钟内即可完成FR评估,扫描质量/所用时间与先前经验无关。94%的人完成扫描达到可接受标准,表明PLR时进行颈动脉多普勒血流检查便于为低血压患者的管理提供关键信息。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

2
Assessing volume status and fluid responsiveness in the emergency department.急诊科容量状态及液体反应性评估
Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2014 Dec 31;1(2):67-77. doi: 10.15441/ceem.14.040. eCollection 2014 Dec.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验