Khurana Tanu, Gupta Amit, Rathi Hemant
Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Skyward Analytics Private Limited, Gurgaon, Haryana, India.
Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Skyward Analytics Pte. Limited Singapore, Singapore.
Perspect Clin Res. 2021 Oct-Dec;12(4):179-183. doi: 10.4103/picr.PICR_256_20. Epub 2021 Jul 12.
Cost-utility studies are crucial tools that help policy-makers promote appropriate resource allocation. The objective of this study was to evaluate the extent and quality of cost-utility analysis (CUA) in India through a systematic literature review.
Comprehensive database search was conducted to identify the relevant literature published from November 2009 to November 2019. Gray literature and hand searches were also performed. Two researchers independently reviewed and assessed study quality using Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards checklist.
Thirty-five studies were included in the final review. Thirteen studies used Markov model, five used decision tree model, four used a combination of decision tree and Markov model and one each used microsimulation and dynamic compartmental model. The primary therapeutic areas targeted in CUA were infectious diseases ( = 12), ophthalmology ( = 5), and endocrine disorders ( = 4). Five studies were carried out in Tamil Nadu, four in Goa, three in Punjab, two each in Delhi, Maharashtra, and Uttar Pradesh, and one each in West Bengal and Karnataka. Twenty-three, eight, and four studies were found to be of excellent, very good, and good quality, respectively. The average quality score of the studies was 19.21 out of 24.
This systematic literature review identified the published CUA studies in India. The overall quality of the included studies was good; however, features such as subgroup analyses and explicit study perspective were missing in several evaluations.
成本效用研究是帮助政策制定者促进合理资源分配的关键工具。本研究的目的是通过系统的文献综述来评估印度成本效用分析(CUA)的范围和质量。
进行全面的数据库搜索,以识别2009年11月至2019年11月发表的相关文献。还进行了灰色文献搜索和手工检索。两名研究人员使用《综合卫生经济评估报告标准》清单独立审查并评估研究质量。
最终综述纳入了35项研究。13项研究使用了马尔可夫模型,5项使用了决策树模型,4项使用了决策树和马尔可夫模型的组合,1项分别使用了微观模拟和动态房室模型。CUA的主要治疗领域是传染病(n = 12)、眼科(n = 5)和内分泌疾病(n = 4)。5项研究在泰米尔纳德邦进行,4项在果阿进行,3项在旁遮普邦进行,德里、马哈拉施特拉邦和北方邦各进行2项,西孟加拉邦和卡纳塔克邦各进行1项。分别有23项、8项和4项研究被评为优秀、非常好和好质量。这些研究的平均质量得分在24分中为19.21分。
本系统文献综述确定了印度已发表的CUA研究。纳入研究的总体质量良好;然而,在一些评估中缺少亚组分析和明确的研究视角等特征。