Department of Gastroenterology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India.
Harold and Inge Marcus Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Penn State University, State College, Pennsylvania, USA.
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Dec;33(12):2029-2036. doi: 10.1111/jgh.14301. Epub 2018 Jun 25.
Treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection with low-cost generic direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) available in India and other developing countries needs determination of HCV genotype ("genotype-dependent" regimens). Generic velpatasvir, a DAA that obviates the need for genotype determination ("pan-genotypic" regimen), recently became available but is costlier. The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of genotype-dependent versus pan-genotypic DAA treatments in India.
A previously validated microsimulation model, adapted to Indian population, was used to compare the costs and long-term outcomes of three scenarios: no treatment, treatment with genotype-dependent regimens, and treatment with pan-genotypic regimen. Input parameters were derived from literature. Using a payer's perspective and lifetime time horizon, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), total costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio were calculated. Both deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were also conducted.
At the current price ($US223 for 4 weeks), pan-genotypic regimen was cost-saving compared with no treatment. Compared with genotype-dependent regimens, it increased QALYs by 0.92 and increased costs by $US107 but was deemed cost-effective with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $US242 per QALY gained. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis also supported the cost-effectiveness of pan-genotypic regimen. At the reduced price of $US188 for 4 weeks, the pan-genotypic regimen will become cost-neutral to genotype-dependent regimens (current price: $US100 for 4 weeks).
At current prices, velpatasvir-based pan-genotypic regimen is cost-effective for HCV treatment in India where generic drugs are available. A reduction in the prices of pan-genotypic regimen has the potential to make its use cost-saving while simplifying treatment in community-level programs aimed at HCV elimination.
在印度和其他发展中国家,使用低成本的通用直接作用抗病毒药物(DAAs)治疗丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)感染需要确定 HCV 基因型(“基因型依赖性”方案)。通用伏拉帕他韦是一种无需确定基因型的 DAAs(“泛基因型”方案),最近已上市,但价格更高。本研究旨在评估印度基因型依赖性与泛基因型 DAA 治疗的成本效益。
使用先前验证的微模拟模型,适用于印度人群,比较三种方案的成本和长期结果:不治疗、基因型依赖性方案治疗和泛基因型方案治疗。输入参数来自文献。采用支付者的观点和终生时间范围,计算了质量调整生命年(QALYs)、总费用和增量成本效益比。还进行了确定性和概率敏感性分析。
在当前价格(4 周 223 美元)下,与不治疗相比,泛基因型方案具有成本效益。与基因型依赖性方案相比,它增加了 0.92 个 QALYs,并增加了 107 美元的成本,但被认为具有成本效益,增量成本效益比为每获得一个 QALY 增加 242 美元。概率敏感性分析也支持泛基因型方案的成本效益。在 4 周 188 美元的降价下,泛基因型方案将与基因型依赖性方案持平(目前价格:4 周 100 美元)。
在当前价格下,基于伏拉帕他韦的泛基因型方案在印度治疗 HCV 具有成本效益,印度有通用药物。降低泛基因型方案的价格有可能使其在简化旨在消除 HCV 的社区级项目中的治疗的同时具有成本效益。