Suppr超能文献

以卓越的微血管成像技术观察看不见的:正常皮肤血管的超声描述。

Seeing the unseen with superb microvascular imaging: Ultrasound depiction of normal dermis vessels.

机构信息

Motor Science and Wellness Department, University of Naples "Parthenope", Naples, Italy.

Radiology Unit, Istituto Diagnostico Varelli, Naples, Italy.

出版信息

J Clin Ultrasound. 2022 Jan;50(1):121-127. doi: 10.1002/jcu.23068. Epub 2021 Nov 10.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Current color- and power-Doppler techniques cannot demonstrate vascularization of the dermis. Aim of this prospective study was to investigate whether the new superb vascular imaging (SMI) technique improves the ultrasound (US) depiction of dermis vessels in healthy volunteers. SMI was compared side-by-side to conventional power-Doppler (PD) imaging.

METHODS

Thirty adult subjects (18 men and 12 women, mean age 45 years old) were evaluated with US at level of five body areas: forehead, forearm, palm, buttock, and thigh. The vascular index (VI) was employed to objectively quantify the difference between SMI and PD imaging in terms of dermis flow amount.

RESULTS

Forehead VI was higher for SMI than for PD in 93% of cases, forearm VI was higher for SMI than for PD in 97% of cases, palm VI was higher for SMI than for PD in 87% of cases, buttock VI was higher for SMI than for PD in 100% of cases, thigh VI was higher for SMI than for PD in 100% of cases. SMI-detected vascular signals in 100% of the body areas. PD failed to show any flow signals from the forehead in 23% of cases, forearm in 37% of cases, palm in 33% of cases, buttock in 47% of cases, and thigh in 50% of cases.

CONCLUSION

SMI can demonstrate normal dermis vascularization whereas conventional PD cannot. SMI is a sensitive and promising technique in the study of dermis abnormalities, particularly when quantifying the disease activity is important.

摘要

目的

目前的彩色和功率多普勒技术无法显示真皮的血管化。本前瞻性研究的目的是探讨新的超级血流成像(SMI)技术是否能改善健康志愿者的超声(US)对真皮血管的显示。SMI 与传统的功率多普勒(PD)成像并排进行比较。

方法

30 名成年受试者(18 名男性和 12 名女性,平均年龄 45 岁)在五个身体部位进行 US 评估:额头、前臂、手掌、臀部和大腿。血管指数(VI)用于客观地量化 SMI 和 PD 成像在真皮流量方面的差异。

结果

SMI 的额部 VI 高于 PD 的 93%,SMI 的前臂 VI 高于 PD 的 97%,SMI 的手掌 VI 高于 PD 的 87%,SMI 的臀部 VI 高于 PD 的 100%,SMI 的大腿 VI 高于 PD 的 100%。SMI 在 100%的身体区域检测到血管信号。PD 在前额的 23%、前臂的 37%、手掌的 33%、臀部的 47%和大腿的 50%的情况下未能显示任何血流信号。

结论

SMI 可以显示正常的真皮血管化,而传统的 PD 则不能。SMI 是研究真皮异常的一种敏感而有前途的技术,特别是在量化疾病活动时很重要。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验