Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Koshigaya Municipal Hospital, Saitama, Japan; Department of Orthopaedics, Juntendo University, Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Koshigaya Municipal Hospital, Saitama, Japan; Department of Orthopaedics, Juntendo University, Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2022 May;108(3):103141. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2021.103141. Epub 2021 Nov 8.
It has been recognized that psychological factors influence the return to sports after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). The ACL-return to sports after injury (RSI) scale was developed based on subcategories of emotions, confidence in physical performance and risk appraisal. However, it has not been clarified describing which is the most influential psychological factor of the ACL-RSI scale.
Risk appraisal is the most influent for return to sports in the subcategories of the ACL-RSI scale.
A total of 85 competitive patients who had undergone ACLR were evaluated at 6, 12 and 24 months after surgery. They were classified the return to sports (RTS) group and non-return to sports (NRTS) group. Evaluations were several clinical and functional scores including Cincinnati knee rating system, Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Lysholm score, limitation in activities of daily living (ADL) and sports which estimated by Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score, Isokinetic Muscle Strength (quadriceps and hamstrings), single hop test and anterior laxity. They were investigated their relationship with the ACL-RSI scale including each subcategory.
The total ACL-RSI scale significantly improved at each point. Of the subcategories, only risk appraisal was not significantly different at each point (p=0.21 and p=0.13). There was a significant difference at 24 months after ACLR between the RTS group and NRTS group. In terms of risk appraisal, compared with emotion and performance confidence, the difference in the mean value was the most divergent (RTS group: 55.9±22.7 and NRTS group: 23.8±19.3) and took time to improve through 24 months. Among various clinical and functional scores, there were significant differences in the VAS score for sports, KOOS-symptoms, sports and QOL, Cincinnati Knee Rating System-cut, and single hop test values between two groups. Of these, the KOOS-QOL and VAS score for sports showed particularly strong correlations with ACL-RSI risk appraisal (r=0.75 and -0.68, respectively).
Of the ACL-RSI scale, risk appraisal took the longest time to improve and strongly affected the return to sports. The KOOS-QOL and VAS score for sports were most strongly correlated with the ACL-RSI risk appraisal. It seems that it is important to reduce the psychological risk as soon as possible after ACL injury in ACLR patients.
II.
人们已经认识到心理因素会影响前交叉韧带重建(ACL)后的运动恢复。ACL 损伤后重返运动(RSI)量表是根据情绪、身体表现信心和风险评估的亚类开发的。然而,尚未明确描述 ACL-RSI 量表中最具影响力的心理因素是哪个。
风险评估是 ACL-RSI 量表亚类中对运动恢复影响最大的因素。
共 85 名接受 ACLR 的竞技患者在术后 6、12 和 24 个月进行评估。他们被分为重返运动(RTS)组和非重返运动(NRTS)组。评估包括几个临床和功能评分,包括辛辛那提膝关节评分系统、膝关节骨关节炎结局评分(KOOS)、Lysholm 评分、日常生活活动(ADL)受限和通过视觉模拟评分(VAS)评分估计的运动,等速肌肉力量(股四头肌和腘绳肌)、单腿跳测试和前向松弛度。评估了它们与 ACL-RSI 量表及其各个亚类的关系。
ACL-RSI 量表的总分在每个时间点都显著提高。在亚类中,只有风险评估在每个时间点都没有显著差异(p=0.21 和 p=0.13)。在 ACLR 后 24 个月,RTS 组和 NRTS 组之间存在显著差异。在风险评估方面,与情绪和表现信心相比,平均值的差异最大(RTS 组:55.9±22.7,NRTS 组:23.8±19.3),并需要 24 个月才能改善。在各种临床和功能评分中,两组之间的运动 VAS 评分、KOOS-症状、运动和生活质量、辛辛那提膝关节评分系统切口和单腿跳测试值存在显著差异。其中,KOOS-QOL 和运动 VAS 评分与 ACL-RSI 风险评估相关性最强(r=0.75 和 -0.68)。
在 ACL-RSI 量表中,风险评估需要最长的时间来改善,并且对运动恢复有强烈的影响。KOOS-QOL 和运动 VAS 评分与 ACL-RSI 风险评估相关性最强。ACL 损伤后,尽快降低 ACLR 患者的心理风险似乎很重要。
II。