Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Department of Emergency Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
J Vasc Access. 2023 Sep;24(5):879-888. doi: 10.1177/11297298211053447. Epub 2021 Nov 11.
The adoption rate of point of care ultrasound (POCUS) for the confirmation of central venous catheter (CVC) positioning and exclusion of post procedure pneumothorax is low despite advantages in workflow compared to traditional chest X-ray (CXR). To explore why, we convened focus groups to address barriers and facilitators of implementation for POCUS guided CVC confirmation and de-implementation of post-procedure CXR.
We conducted focus groups with emergency medicine and critical care providers to discuss current practices in POCUS for CVC confirmation. The semi-structured focus group interview guide was informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). We performed qualitative content analysis of the resulting transcripts using a consensual qualitative research approach (NVivo software), aiming to identify priority categories that describe the barriers and facilitators of POCUS guided CVC confirmation.
The coding dictionary of barriers and facilitators consisted of 21 codes from the focus group discussions. Our qualitative analysis revealed that 12 codes emerged spontaneously (inductively) within the focus group discussions and aligned directly to CFIR constructs. Common barriers included (e.g. knowledge and beliefs about POCUS for CVC confirmation), (e.g. societal guidelines, ancillary staff, and consultants), and (habit or reflexive processes). Common facilitators included and and (cognitive offload, ownership, and independence) emerged as early barriers but late facilitators.
Our qualitative analysis demonstrates real and perceived barriers against implementation of POCUS for CVC position confirmation and pneumothorax exclusion. Our findings discovered organizational and personal constructs that will inform development of multifaceted strategies toward implementation of POCUS after CVC insertion.
尽管与传统的胸部 X 光(CXR)相比,即时超声(POCUS)在工作流程方面具有优势,但中心静脉导管(CVC)定位的确认和术后气胸的排除的使用率仍然很低。为了探究原因,我们召集了焦点小组,以解决实施 POCUS 引导的 CVC 确认和术后 CXR 去实施的障碍和促进因素。
我们对急诊医学和重症监护提供者进行了焦点小组讨论,以讨论 CVC 确认中 POCUS 的当前实践。半结构化的焦点小组访谈指南由实施研究综合框架(CFIR)提供信息。我们使用共识定性研究方法(NVivo 软件)对生成的转录本进行定性内容分析,旨在确定优先类别,描述 POCUS 引导的 CVC 确认的障碍和促进因素。
障碍和促进因素的编码字典由焦点小组讨论中的 21 个代码组成。我们的定性分析表明,12 个代码在焦点小组讨论中自发出现(归纳),并直接与 CFIR 结构对齐。常见的障碍包括(例如,对 POCUS 进行 CVC 确认的知识和信念)、(例如,社会准则、辅助人员和顾问)和(习惯或反射性过程)。常见的促进因素包括(例如,资源可及性)、(例如,组织的支持)和(例如,领导的倡导)和(认知减轻、所有权和独立性)作为早期障碍但后期促进因素出现。
我们的定性分析表明,在实施 POCUS 进行 CVC 位置确认和气胸排除方面存在真实和感知的障碍。我们的发现发现了组织和个人结构,这将为实施 POCUS 后插入 CVC 提供多方面的策略提供信息。