• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于自然语言处理的中心静脉导管置入术后气胸发生率分析:基于价值医疗的常规影像学数据驱动再评估

NLP-Driven Analysis of Pneumothorax Incidence Following Central Venous Catheter Procedures: A Data-Driven Re-Evaluation of Routine Imaging in Value-Based Medicine.

作者信息

Breitwieser Martin, Moore Vanessa, Wiesner Teresa, Wichlas Florian, Deininger Christian

机构信息

Department for Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, Paracelsus Medical University, 5020 Salzburg, Austria.

出版信息

Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Dec 12;14(24):2792. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14242792.

DOI:10.3390/diagnostics14242792
PMID:39767153
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11674588/
Abstract

: This study presents a systematic approach using a natural language processing (NLP) algorithm to assess the necessity of routine imaging after central venous catheter (CVC) placement and removal. With pneumothorax being a key complication of CVC procedures, this research aims to provide evidence-based recommendations for optimizing imaging protocols and minimizing unnecessary imaging risks. We analyzed electronic health records from four university hospitals in Salzburg, Austria, focusing on X-rays performed between 2012 and 2021 following CVC procedures. A custom-built NLP algorithm identified cases of pneumothorax from radiologists' reports and clinician requests, while excluding cases with contraindications such as chest injuries, prior pneumothorax, or missing data. Chi-square tests were used to compare pneumothorax rates between CVC insertion and removal, and multivariate logistic regression identified risk factors, with a focus on age and gender. : This study analyzed 17,175 cases of patients aged 18 and older, with 95.4% involving CVC insertion and 4.6% involving CVC removal. Pneumothorax was observed in 106 cases post-insertion (1.3%) and in 3 cases post-removal (0.02%), with no statistically significant difference between procedures ( = 0.5025). The NLP algorithm achieved an accuracy of 93%, with a sensitivity of 97.9%, a specificity of 87.9%, and an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.9283. : The findings indicate no significant difference in pneumothorax incidence between CVC insertion and removal, supporting existing recommendations against routine imaging post-removal for asymptomatic patients and suggesting that routine imaging after CVC insertion may also be unnecessary in similar cases. This study demonstrates how advanced NLP techniques can support value-based medicine by enhancing clinical decision making and optimizing resources.

摘要

本研究提出了一种系统方法,使用自然语言处理(NLP)算法来评估中心静脉导管(CVC)置入和拔除后进行常规成像的必要性。气胸是CVC操作的关键并发症,本研究旨在为优化成像方案和最小化不必要的成像风险提供循证建议。我们分析了奥地利萨尔茨堡四家大学医院的电子健康记录,重点关注2012年至2021年CVC操作后进行的X线检查。一个定制的NLP算法从放射科医生的报告和临床医生的请求中识别气胸病例,同时排除有胸部损伤、既往气胸或数据缺失等禁忌证的病例。使用卡方检验比较CVC置入和拔除后的气胸发生率,多因素逻辑回归确定风险因素,重点关注年龄和性别。本研究分析了17175例18岁及以上患者的病例,其中95.4%涉及CVC置入,4.6%涉及CVC拔除。置入后观察到106例气胸(1.3%),拔除后观察到3例气胸(0.02%),两种操作之间无统计学显著差异(P = 0.5025)。NLP算法的准确率为93%,灵敏度为97.9%,特异度为87.9%,ROC曲线下面积(AUC)为0.9283。研究结果表明,CVC置入和拔除后的气胸发生率无显著差异,支持现有针对无症状患者拔除后不进行常规成像的建议,并表明在类似情况下,CVC置入后进行常规成像可能也不必要。本研究展示了先进的NLP技术如何通过加强临床决策和优化资源来支持基于价值的医学。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/535c/11674588/163a9f123d0e/diagnostics-14-02792-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/535c/11674588/0b1bc86f2f47/diagnostics-14-02792-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/535c/11674588/163a9f123d0e/diagnostics-14-02792-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/535c/11674588/0b1bc86f2f47/diagnostics-14-02792-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/535c/11674588/163a9f123d0e/diagnostics-14-02792-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
NLP-Driven Analysis of Pneumothorax Incidence Following Central Venous Catheter Procedures: A Data-Driven Re-Evaluation of Routine Imaging in Value-Based Medicine.基于自然语言处理的中心静脉导管置入术后气胸发生率分析:基于价值医疗的常规影像学数据驱动再评估
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Dec 12;14(24):2792. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14242792.
2
Cost-Effectiveness of Routine X-Rays After Central Venous Catheter Removal: A Value-Based Analysis of Post-Removal Complications.中心静脉导管拔除后常规X线检查的成本效益:基于价值的拔除后并发症分析。
J Clin Med. 2025 Feb 19;14(4):1397. doi: 10.3390/jcm14041397.
3
Is Routine Chest X-Ray After Ultrasound-Guided Central Venous Catheter Insertion Choosing Wisely?: A Population-Based Retrospective Study of 6,875 Patients.超声引导下中心静脉置管后常规胸部 X 线检查是否明智?:一项 6875 例患者的基于人群的回顾性研究。
Chest. 2018 Jul;154(1):148-156. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2018.02.017. Epub 2018 Mar 6.
4
Recommendations on the Use of Ultrasound Guidance for Central and Peripheral Vascular Access in Adults: A Position Statement of the Society of Hospital Medicine.《成人中心和外周血管通路超声引导使用建议:医院医学协会立场声明》
J Hosp Med. 2019 Sep;14(9):E1-E22. doi: 10.12788/jhm.3287.
5
Routine X-ray control of upper central venous lines: Is it necessary?对上腔静脉置管进行常规X线检查:有必要吗?
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2004 Jul;48(6):685-9. doi: 10.1111/j.0001-5172.2004.00400.x.
6
Clinical Practices in Central Venous Catheter Mechanical Adverse Events.中心静脉导管机械性不良事件的临床实践
J Intensive Care Med. 2022 Sep;37(9):1215-1222. doi: 10.1177/08850666221076798. Epub 2022 Jun 20.
7
Bedside ultrasound to detect central venous catheter misplacement and associated iatrogenic complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis.床边超声检测中心静脉导管位置不当及相关医源性并发症:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Crit Care. 2018 Mar 13;22(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s13054-018-1989-x.
8
[Ultrasound visualization of the guidewire and positioning of the central venous catheter : A prospective observational study].[导丝的超声可视化及中心静脉导管的定位:一项前瞻性观察研究]
Anaesthesist. 2020 Jul;69(7):489-496. doi: 10.1007/s00101-020-00794-7. Epub 2020 May 14.
9
Complication Rates of Central Venous Catheters: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.中心静脉导管相关并发症发生率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Intern Med. 2024 May 1;184(5):474-482. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.8232.
10
A Contemporary Assessment of Mechanical Complication Rates and Trainee Perceptions of Central Venous Catheter Insertion.中心静脉导管插入术机械并发症发生率及实习医生认知的当代评估
J Hosp Med. 2017 Aug;12(8):646-651. doi: 10.12788/jhm.2784.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost-Effectiveness of Routine X-Rays After Central Venous Catheter Removal: A Value-Based Analysis of Post-Removal Complications.中心静脉导管拔除后常规X线检查的成本效益:基于价值的拔除后并发症分析。
J Clin Med. 2025 Feb 19;14(4):1397. doi: 10.3390/jcm14041397.

本文引用的文献

1
Are routine chest radiographs still indicated after central line insertion? A scoping review.中心静脉置管后是否仍需进行常规胸部X线检查?一项范围综述。
J Intensive Care Soc. 2024 Feb 19;25(2):190-207. doi: 10.1177/17511437241227739. eCollection 2024 May.
2
Complication Rates of Central Venous Catheters: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.中心静脉导管相关并发症发生率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Intern Med. 2024 May 1;184(5):474-482. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.8232.
3
ChatGPT in healthcare: A taxonomy and systematic review.
ChatGPT 在医疗保健中的应用:分类法与系统综述。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2024 Mar;245:108013. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2024.108013. Epub 2024 Jan 15.
4
Applications of the Natural Language Processing Tool ChatGPT in Clinical Practice: Comparative Study and Augmented Systematic Review.自然语言处理工具ChatGPT在临床实践中的应用:比较研究与增强型系统评价
JMIR Med Inform. 2023 Nov 28;11:e48933. doi: 10.2196/48933.
5
Efficacy and safety of supraclavicular versus infraclavicular approach for subclavian vein catheterisation: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.锁骨上与锁骨下途径行锁骨下静脉置管的有效性和安全性:随机对照试验的最新系统评价和荟萃分析
Indian J Anaesth. 2023 Jun;67(6):486-496. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_837_22. Epub 2023 Jun 14.
6
Clinical named entity recognition and relation extraction using natural language processing of medical free text: A systematic review.临床命名实体识别和关系抽取技术在医学自然语言处理中的应用:系统综述。
Int J Med Inform. 2023 Sep;177:105122. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2023.105122. Epub 2023 Jun 5.
7
Central venous catheters: Which, when and how.中心静脉导管:何时、如何以及选择哪种。
Br J Radiol. 2023 Nov;96(1151):20220894. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20220894. Epub 2023 May 25.
8
Comments on "Economic Evaluation of Ultrasound-guided Central Venous Catheter Confirmation vs Chest Radiography in Critically Ill Patients: A Labor Cost Model".对《重症患者超声引导下中心静脉导管确认与胸部X线摄影的经济学评估:劳动力成本模型》的评论
West J Emerg Med. 2023 Mar 6;24(2):368-369. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2022.10.59187.
9
Natural language processing in radiology: Clinical applications and future directions.放射学中的自然语言处理:临床应用与未来方向。
Clin Imaging. 2023 May;97:55-61. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2023.02.014. Epub 2023 Mar 5.
10
Economic Evaluation of Ultrasound-guided Central Venous Catheter Confirmation vs Chest Radiography in Critically Ill Patients: A Labor Cost Model.超声引导下中心静脉导管确认与胸部 X 光检查在危重症患者中的经济学评价:劳动力成本模型。
West J Emerg Med. 2022 Sep 15;23(5):760-768. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2022.7.56501.