Suppr超能文献

与脊柱和外周关节推拿及松动相关不良事件的标准化定义和严重程度分类的专家共识:一项国际性电子 Delphi 研究的方案。

Expert consensus on a standardised definition and severity classification for adverse events associated with spinal and peripheral joint manipulation and mobilisation: protocol for an international e-Delphi study.

机构信息

Division of Research and Innovation, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Department of Chiropractic, University of Quebec in Trois Rivieres, Trois-Rivieres, Quebec, Canada.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2021 Nov 11;11(11):e050219. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050219.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Spinal and peripheral joint manipulation (SMT) and mobilisation (MOB) are widely used and recommended in the best practice guidelines for managing musculoskeletal conditions. Although adverse events (AEs) have been reported following these interventions, a clear definition and classification system for AEs remains unsettled. With many professionals using SMT and MOB, establishing consensus on a definition and classification system is needed to assist with the assimilation of AEs data across professions and to inform research priorities to optimise safety in clinical practice.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This international multidisciplinary electronic Delphi study protocol is informed by a scoping review and in accordance with the 'Guidance on Conduction and Reporting Delphi Studies'. With oversight from an expert steering committee, the study comprises three rounds using online questionnaires. Experts in manual therapy and patient safety meeting strict eligibility criteria from the following fields will be invited to participate: clinical, medical and legal practice, health records, regulatory bodies, researchers and patients. Round 1 will include open-ended questions on participants' working definition and/or understanding of AEs following SMT and MOB and their severity classification. In round 2, participants will rate their level of agreement with statements generated from round 1 and our scoping review. In round 3, participants will rerate their agreement with statements achieving consensus in round 2. Statements reaching consensus must meet the a priori criteria, as determined by descriptive analysis. Inferential statistics will be used to evaluate agreement between participants and stability of responses between rounds. Statements achieving consensus in round 3 will provide an expert-derived definition and classification system for AEs following SMT and MOB.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study was approved by the Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College Research Ethics Board and deemed exempt by Parker University's Institutional Review Board. Results will be disseminated through scientific, professional and educational reports, publications and presentations.

摘要

简介

脊柱和外周关节手法(SMT)和松动术(MOB)在管理肌肉骨骼疾病的最佳实践指南中被广泛应用和推荐。尽管这些干预措施后已经报告了不良事件(AE),但 AE 的明确定义和分类系统仍未确定。随着许多专业人员使用 SMT 和 MOB,需要就定义和分类系统达成共识,以协助跨专业同化 AE 数据,并为优化临床实践中的安全性提供研究重点。

方法和分析

本国际多学科电子 Delphi 研究方案由范围综述提供信息,并符合“Delphi 研究指南”。在专家指导委员会的监督下,该研究由三轮在线问卷组成。将邀请来自以下领域的符合严格资格标准的手法治疗和患者安全专家参与:临床、医疗和法律实践、健康记录、监管机构、研究人员和患者。第一轮将包括有关参与者对 SMT 和 MOB 后 AE 的工作定义和/或理解及其严重程度分类的开放性问题。在第二轮中,参与者将对从第一轮和我们的范围综述中生成的陈述进行评级。在第三轮中,参与者将重新对在第二轮中达成共识的陈述进行评级。达成共识的陈述必须符合预先确定的标准,这是由描述性分析确定的。将使用推断统计来评估参与者之间的一致性和各轮之间的响应稳定性。在第三轮中达成共识的陈述将为 SMT 和 MOB 后 AE 提供专家衍生的定义和分类系统。

伦理和传播

本研究得到了加拿大纪念脊椎按摩学院研究伦理委员会的批准,并被帕克大学机构审查委员会视为豁免。结果将通过科学、专业和教育报告、出版物和演示文稿进行传播。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8814/8587360/c4f49057ab7a/bmjopen-2021-050219f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验