Suppr超能文献

瑞马唑仑预处理预防人工流产或刮宫术患者丙泊酚注射痛的疗效:一项前瞻性、双盲、随机、安慰剂对照临床试验。

Efficacy of Pre-Treatment with Remimazolam on Prevention of Propofol-Induced Injection Pain in Patients Undergoing Abortion or Curettage: A Prospective, Double-Blinded, Randomized and Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, People's Republic of China.

Department of Rehabilitation, The People`s Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning, Guangxi, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Drug Des Devel Ther. 2021 Nov 4;15:4551-4558. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S334100. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Propofol-induced injection pain (PIP) is a well-known problem in general anesthesia. We hypothesized that pre-treatment with remimazolam prevents PIP in patients undergoing abortion or curettage.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this prospective, single-center, double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial, adult patients aged 18 to 60 undergoing abortion or curettage were randomly assigned to three groups. Group Lido received system lidocaine (a bolus of 0.5 mg kg, iv). Group Remi received remimazolam (a bolus of 0.1 mg kg, iv). Group NS received identical volumes of 0.9% normal saline. Sixty seconds after the injection of lidocaine, remimazolam or saline, patients were injected with propofol at a rate of 12 mL/min until the loss of consciousness. The primary outcome was the incidence of PIP at the time of induction using 4-point scale. Secondary outcomes included propofol-induced injection pain, vital signs, the characteristics of anesthesia and surgery, and adverse events.

RESULTS

The incidence of patients with PIP was higher in group NS than that in group Lido and group Remi (75.7, 44.3, and 42.9%, respectively, < 0.001). The percentages of patients with moderate PIP were higher in group NS than that in group Lido and group Remi (20.0, 2.9, and 1.4%, respectively, < 0.001). Moreover, the consumption of propofol and the incidence of adverse event (hypoxemia and chin lifting) in group Remi were lower than that in group NS and Lido, and less patients got physical movement and cough in group Remi. The recovery time in group NS was longer than that in group Lido and Remi.

CONCLUSION

Our findings indicate that pre-treatment with remimazolam reduced the incidence and intensity of PIP in abortion or curettage patients, equivalent to that of lidocaine without severe adverse effects.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (identifier: ChiCTR2100041805).

摘要

背景

异丙酚诱导注射痛(PIP)是全身麻醉中众所周知的问题。我们假设雷米咪唑预防行人工流产或刮宫术患者的 PIP。

材料和方法

在这项前瞻性、单中心、双盲、随机、安慰剂对照临床试验中,年龄在 18 至 60 岁之间接受人工流产或刮宫术的成年患者被随机分为三组。利多卡因组(静脉注射 0.5mg/kg 负荷剂量)、雷米咪唑组(静脉注射 0.1mg/kg 负荷剂量)和生理盐水组(注射 0.9%生理盐水)。在注射利多卡因、雷米咪唑或生理盐水 60 秒后,以 12mL/min 的速度给患者注射异丙酚,直到意识丧失。主要结局是采用 4 分制评估诱导时 PIP 的发生率。次要结局包括异丙酚诱导的注射痛、生命体征、麻醉和手术特点以及不良事件。

结果

与利多卡因组和雷米咪唑组相比,生理盐水组患者 PIP 的发生率更高(分别为 75.7%、44.3%和 42.9%,<0.001)。生理盐水组中中度 PIP 的患者百分比高于利多卡因组和雷米咪唑组(分别为 20.0%、2.9%和 1.4%,<0.001)。此外,雷米咪唑组的异丙酚用量和不良事件(低氧血症和颏部抬起)发生率低于生理盐水组和利多卡因组,雷米咪唑组患者的躯体运动和咳嗽较少。生理盐水组的恢复时间长于利多卡因组和雷米咪唑组。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,雷米咪唑预处理可降低人工流产或刮宫术患者 PIP 的发生率和强度,与利多卡因相当,且无严重不良反应。

试验注册

中国临床试验注册中心(注册号:ChiCTR2100041805)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa9d/8576108/ba2077a228e9/DDDT-15-4551-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验