Suppr超能文献

瑞马唑仑用于程序性镇静和镇痛的有效性与安全性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析方案

Efficacy and safety of remimazolam in procedural sedation and analgesia: A protocol for systematic review and meta analysis.

作者信息

Wang Feng, Zhou Qian, Shen Minhuan, Quan Jing, Chen Jiejuan, Shi Jing, Zou Xiaohua

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Gui yang, China.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jul 2;99(27):e20765. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020765.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Remimazolam is a newly developed benzodiazepine as an alternative of conventional sedatives in the procedure of anesthesia. For the purpose of evaluating the efficacy and safety of remimazolam sedation during an endoscopy, we will perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that compared remimazolam with midazolam and/or placebo.

METHODS

We will search PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials (CENTRAL) from inception to December 2019 for randomized controlled trials that investigated efficacy and safety of remimazolam during an endoscopy. The job will be performed without language restriction. Experimental groups will include the interventions of remimazolam, while control groups will involve midazolam, placebo, or no controls. The primary outcome will be the onset time, followed by the secondary outcomes of the recovery time, the incidence of hypotension, the incidence of hypoxia and the incidence of bradycardia. Relative ratio or standardized mean difference will be used to measure the effect size of remimazolam. We will use I statistics to assess the between-study heterogeneity in each meta-analysis, Eager's test to detect publication bias.

RESULTS

The results of this study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

There is no need for ethical approval because all data used in this meta-analysis have been published. In addition, all data will be analyzed anonymously during the review process.

PROTOCOL REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42020170745.

摘要

背景

瑞马唑仑是一种新开发的苯二氮䓬类药物,可作为麻醉过程中传统镇静剂的替代品。为了评估瑞马唑仑在内镜检查中镇静的有效性和安全性,我们将对比较瑞马唑仑与咪达唑仑和/或安慰剂的随机对照试验进行系统评价和荟萃分析。

方法

我们将检索PubMed、Embase、Web of Science和Cochrane对照试验注册中心(CENTRAL),检索时间从创建至2019年12月,以查找调查瑞马唑仑在内镜检查中有效性和安全性的随机对照试验。检索将不受语言限制。实验组将包括瑞马唑仑干预,而对照组将包括咪达唑仑、安慰剂或无对照。主要结局将是起效时间,其次是恢复时间、低血压发生率、低氧血症发生率和心动过缓发生率等次要结局。将使用相对比值或标准化均数差来衡量瑞马唑仑的效应量。我们将使用I统计量评估每个荟萃分析中的研究间异质性,使用Egger检验检测发表偏倚。

结果

本研究结果将发表在同行评审期刊上。

伦理与传播

无需伦理批准,因为本荟萃分析中使用的所有数据均已发表。此外,在审查过程中将对所有数据进行匿名分析。

方案注册号

CRD42020170745。

相似文献

10
Remimazolam: A Review in Procedural Sedation.瑞米唑仑:程序性镇静的综述
Drugs. 2021 Jul;81(10):1193-1201. doi: 10.1007/s40265-021-01544-8. Epub 2021 Jul 1.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验