• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

创伤后二期眶周手术。发病率及结果。

Secondary post-traumatic periorbital surgery. Incidence and results.

作者信息

Freihofer H P, van Damme P A

出版信息

J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 1987 Aug;15(4):183-7. doi: 10.1016/s1010-5182(87)80046-x.

DOI:10.1016/s1010-5182(87)80046-x
PMID:3476501
Abstract

Over a 6 year period 20 patients presented for secondary corrections of the periorbital region after trauma. Corrections after isolated fracture of the zygoma were necessary in 6 cases, mainly comprising re-osteotomies and contour corrections. A tertiary correction was needed only once (17%). Secondary treatment was indicated in 6 patients after fracture of the midface, necessitating mainly re-osteotomies of the zygoma, corrections of the nose and canthopexies. Tertiary corrections were performed in 3 cases (50%). In 8 patients the results of treatment of fronto-orbito-nasal fractures required further improvement. Again, osteotomies of the zygoma, corrections of the nose as well as corrections of scars and bony contours were often indicated. Four cases (50%) needed tertiary surgery. It is concluded that the more serious the primary trauma the greater the necessity for further secondary surgery. Independently of the kind of primary trauma the indication for secondary treatment was, in most cases, aesthetic. Not only was the number of re-osteotomies and nasal corrections high, but also the number of tertiary revisions. While this might not be very surprising for the nose, it is for the zygoma and proves the difficulties which arise for perfect positioning when there are no clear landmarks. Forty percent of all patients underwent tertiary and one patient needs a quaternary correction.

摘要

在6年的时间里,20例患者因外伤后眶周区域的二次修复前来就诊。6例患者因孤立性颧骨骨折后需要进行修复,主要包括再次截骨术和轮廓矫正。仅1例(17%)需要进行三次修复。6例患者因面中部骨折后需要进行二次治疗,主要需要对颧骨进行再次截骨术、矫正鼻部和内眦固定术。3例(50%)进行了三次修复。8例患者额眶鼻骨折的治疗结果需要进一步改善。同样,颧骨截骨术、鼻部矫正以及瘢痕和骨轮廓的矫正也经常需要进行。4例(50%)需要进行三次手术。得出的结论是,原发创伤越严重,进一步进行二次手术的必要性就越大。无论原发创伤的类型如何,二次治疗的指征在大多数情况下都是美学方面的。不仅再次截骨术和鼻部矫正的数量很多,三次修复的数量也很多。虽然这对鼻子来说可能并不十分令人惊讶,但对颧骨来说却是如此,这证明了在没有明确标志时实现完美定位所产生的困难。所有患者中有40%接受了三次修复,1例患者需要进行四次修复。

相似文献

1
Secondary post-traumatic periorbital surgery. Incidence and results.创伤后二期眶周手术。发病率及结果。
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 1987 Aug;15(4):183-7. doi: 10.1016/s1010-5182(87)80046-x.
2
Effectiveness of secondary post-traumatic periorbital reconstruction.创伤后眶周二期重建的有效性
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 1995 Jun;23(3):143-50. doi: 10.1016/s1010-5182(05)80002-2.
3
[Corrections after facial trauma. Experiences with secondary periorbital corrections].[面部创伤后的矫正。眶周二期矫正的经验]
Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd. 1994 Jul;101(7):264-7.
4
[Secondary post-traumatic periorbital reconstructions].[创伤后眶周二期重建]
Fortschr Kiefer Gesichtschir. 1994;39:58-61.
5
Midfacial degloving: an alternative approach for traumatic corrections in the midface.面中部去套状剥离术:一种用于面中部创伤矫正的替代方法。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2001 Aug;30(4):272-7. doi: 10.1054/ijom.2001.0106.
6
Midface fractures.面中部骨折
Facial Plast Surg. 2000;16(2):107-13. doi: 10.1055/s-2000-12572.
7
[Traumatology of the midface--diagnostic and therapeutic guidelines for the practicing ENT physician from the viewpoint of the otorhinolaryngologist].[面中部创伤——从耳鼻喉科医生角度为耳鼻喉科执业医师提供的诊断和治疗指南]
HNO. 1986 Jan;34(1):1-10.
8
Management of complex facial fractures.复杂面部骨折的处理
J Tenn Dent Assoc. 2002 Fall;82(3):69-73.
9
Functional recovery time after facial fractures: characteristics and associated factors in a sample of patients from southern Brazil.面部骨折后的功能恢复时间:巴西南部患者样本的特征和相关因素。
Rev Col Bras Cir. 2021 Jan 13;48:e20202581. doi: 10.1590/0100-6991e-20202581. eCollection 2021.
10
Management of midface maxillofacial trauma.面中部颌面创伤的处理
Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2013 Mar;21(1):69-95. doi: 10.1016/j.cxom.2012.12.010.