Starcevich Amy, Lombardo Paul, Schneider Michal
Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences Monash University Clayton Victoria Australia.
Australas J Ultrasound Med. 2020 Nov 29;24(2):82-88. doi: 10.1002/ajum.12237. eCollection 2021 May.
To determine patient understanding and expectations of ultrasound imaging and its safety, sources of examination information and levels of examination anxiety.
1070 consecutive patients presenting to a private, regional radiology practice in New South Wales, Australia between 16 May and 14 June 2019, were invited to complete a survey while waiting for their non-interventional ultrasound examination. The survey included questions on demographic characteristics, knowledge such as examination risks and safety, ultrasound expectations such as dissemination of results, sources of examination information and levels of participant anxiety. Data were analysed using Kruskal-Wallis tests (SPSS v. 25) to determine statistical associations between participant demographic factors, knowledge, anxiety level and the main source of examination information.
A total of 215/1070 (20%) patients voluntarily participated in the study. Most were female (74%, 159/215), with a median (range) age of 55 (18-92) years. Participant's median (range) score of ultrasound imaging knowledge was 3 (0-5) scored out of six and indicated uncertainty regarding the ultrasound procedure, result dissemination and ultrasound safety. Participants with previous personal experience had significantly higher levels of ultrasound imaging knowledge than those whose primary information source was their referring doctor (P = 0.0005) or the internet (P = 0.026). Significantly higher levels of ultrasound examination knowledge were also associated with lower self-reported levels of anxiety (P = 0.002).
Participants had incomplete ultrasound examination knowledge, including misconceptions regarding safety and result dissemination, some of which could be clarified by the sonographer at the beginning of the ultrasound examination.
确定患者对超声成像及其安全性的理解和期望、检查信息来源以及检查焦虑程度。
2019年5月16日至6月14日期间,连续邀请1070名前往澳大利亚新南威尔士州一家私立地区放射科就诊的患者,在等待非介入性超声检查时完成一项调查。该调查包括有关人口统计学特征的问题、诸如检查风险和安全性等知识、诸如结果传播等超声期望、检查信息来源以及参与者的焦虑程度。使用Kruskal-Wallis检验(SPSS v. 25)对数据进行分析,以确定参与者的人口统计学因素、知识、焦虑水平与检查信息的主要来源之间的统计关联。
共有215/1070(20%)名患者自愿参与了该研究。大多数为女性(74%,159/215),年龄中位数(范围)为55(18 - 92)岁。参与者超声成像知识的中位数(范围)得分为3(0 - 5)分(满分6分),表明对超声检查程序、结果传播和超声安全性存在不确定性。有过个人亲身经历的参与者的超声成像知识水平显著高于那些主要信息来源是转诊医生(P = 0.0005)或互联网(P = 0.026)的参与者。较高水平的超声检查知识也与较低的自我报告焦虑水平相关(P = 0.002)。
参与者对超声检查的知识不完整,包括对安全性和结果传播的误解,其中一些误解超声检查人员在超声检查开始时可以予以澄清。