• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在胎儿模型的脑结构测量中进行融合成像,将实时超声与磁共振成像相结合。

Fusion imaging in brain structure measurements on a fetus phantom, combining real-time ultrasound with magnetic resonance imaging.

作者信息

Arechvo Anastasija, Lingman Göran, Thurn Lars, Jansson Tomas, Jokubkiene Ligita

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Skåne University Hospital Lund University Lund Sweden.

Department Obstetrics and Gynecology IKVL Medical Faculty Lund University Lund Sweden.

出版信息

Australas J Ultrasound Med. 2021 May 25;24(3):161-172. doi: 10.1002/ajum.12246. eCollection 2021 Aug.

DOI:10.1002/ajum.12246
PMID:34765426
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8409451/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To assess synchronisation of MRI and US in measuring foetus phantom head structures; inter-method, intra- and inter-observer differences on biparietal diameter (BPD), head diameter, anterio-posterior head diameter (HAP) and lateral ventricle structures (VS).

METHODS

Fusion Imaging (FI) has been performed by combining MRI and US simultaneously. Axial scans of 1.5 Tesla MRI on a foetus phantom were acquired and uploaded on a US machine (EPIQ 7G, Philips). A PercuNav US tracker allowed the system to recognise and display the position of the transducer. A fetal phantom tracker was used as a phantom reference. Real-time US of the phantom head was performed by synchronising the uploaded MRI images using different landmarks. Synchronisation has been assessed by taking measurements after rotating the US probe by 90. Measurements were taken by three different observers twice. Differences in measurements between MRI and US, inter-, intra-observer differences in all measurements were assessed.

RESULTS

BPD, HAP and VS measurements before rotation were 0.13 ± 0.06 cm, 0.46 ± 0.09 cm and 0.4 ± 0.23 cm (width) and mean 0.6 ± 0.25 cm (length) larger at MRI than at US using any number of landmarks. After US probe rotation VS were 0.3 ± 0.24 cm in width and 0.3 ± 0.27 cm in length. Intra- and inter-observer differences in all measurements were small.

CONCLUSIONS

FI showed good synchronisation in measurements. BPD, HAP and VS were larger at MRI than US, likely a result of the way images are generated. Intra-, inter-observer differences between measurements were small. This can be important when reporting geometric measures from FI.

摘要

目的

评估磁共振成像(MRI)和超声(US)在测量胎儿头部模型结构时的同步性;比较两种方法之间、观察者内部和观察者之间在双顶径(BPD)、头径、前后头径(HAP)和侧脑室结构(VS)测量上的差异。

方法

通过同时结合MRI和US进行融合成像(FI)。在胎儿头部模型上进行1.5特斯拉MRI的轴向扫描,并上传至超声设备(飞利浦EPIQ 7G)。PercuNav超声跟踪器使系统能够识别并显示换能器的位置。使用胎儿头部模型跟踪器作为模型参考。通过使用不同的标志点同步上传的MRI图像,对模型头部进行实时超声检查。通过将超声探头旋转90°后进行测量来评估同步性。由三名不同的观察者进行两次测量。评估MRI和US测量结果之间的差异,以及所有测量中观察者内部和观察者之间的差异。

结果

使用任何数量的标志点时,旋转前MRI测量的BPD、HAP和VS分别为0.13±0.06厘米、0.46±0.09厘米和0.4±0.23厘米(宽度),平均长度比US大0.6±0.25厘米。超声探头旋转后,VS宽度为0.3±0.24厘米,长度为0.3±0.27厘米。所有测量中观察者内部和观察者之间的差异都很小。

结论

FI在测量中显示出良好的同步性。MRI测量的BPD、HAP和VS比US大,这可能是图像生成方式的结果。测量中观察者内部和观察者之间的差异很小。这在报告FI的几何测量结果时可能很重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35cd/8409451/45f3b0f7be14/AJUM-24-161-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35cd/8409451/8210bd0ce389/AJUM-24-161-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35cd/8409451/23b4589228f2/AJUM-24-161-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35cd/8409451/32e5e68f09fa/AJUM-24-161-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35cd/8409451/d7bac42fd597/AJUM-24-161-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35cd/8409451/47e3a525e1c3/AJUM-24-161-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35cd/8409451/45f3b0f7be14/AJUM-24-161-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35cd/8409451/8210bd0ce389/AJUM-24-161-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35cd/8409451/23b4589228f2/AJUM-24-161-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35cd/8409451/32e5e68f09fa/AJUM-24-161-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35cd/8409451/d7bac42fd597/AJUM-24-161-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35cd/8409451/47e3a525e1c3/AJUM-24-161-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35cd/8409451/45f3b0f7be14/AJUM-24-161-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Fusion imaging in brain structure measurements on a fetus phantom, combining real-time ultrasound with magnetic resonance imaging.在胎儿模型的脑结构测量中进行融合成像,将实时超声与磁共振成像相结合。
Australas J Ultrasound Med. 2021 May 25;24(3):161-172. doi: 10.1002/ajum.12246. eCollection 2021 Aug.
2
A comparison of ultrasound with magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of fetal biometry and weight in the second trimester of pregnancy: An observer agreement and variability study.孕期中期超声与磁共振成像在评估胎儿生物测量和体重方面的比较:一项观察者一致性和变异性研究。
Ultrasound. 2018 Nov;26(4):229-244. doi: 10.1177/1742271X17753738. Epub 2018 Jan 29.
3
Magnetic resonance imaging in the radiation treatment planning of localized prostate cancer using intra-prostatic fiducial markers for computed tomography co-registration.使用前列腺内基准标记进行计算机断层扫描共配准的局部前列腺癌放射治疗计划中的磁共振成像。
Radiother Oncol. 2003 Feb;66(2):217-24. doi: 10.1016/s0167-8140(02)00407-3.
4
Common fetal measurements: a comparison between ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging.常见胎儿测量方法:超声与磁共振成像的比较
Acta Radiol. 2010 Feb;51(1):85-91. doi: 10.3109/02841850903334461.
5
Fetal Brain Biometric Measurements on 3D Super-Resolution Reconstructed T2-Weighted MRI: An Intra- and Inter-observer Agreement Study.基于三维超分辨率重建T2加权磁共振成像的胎儿脑生物特征测量:观察者内和观察者间一致性研究
Front Pediatr. 2021 Aug 10;9:639746. doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.639746. eCollection 2021.
6
3D ultrasound system to investigate intraventricular hemorrhage in preterm neonates.三维超声系统在早产儿脑室出血中的应用研究。
Phys Med Biol. 2013 Nov 7;58(21):7513-26. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/58/21/7513. Epub 2013 Oct 8.
7
Accuracy of automated three-dimensional ultrasound imaging technique for fetal head biometry.自动化三维超声成像技术在胎儿头部生物测量中的准确性。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021 May;57(5):798-803. doi: 10.1002/uog.22171.
8
Assessment and quantification of sources of variability in breast apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements at diffusion weighted imaging.扩散加权成像中乳腺表观扩散系数(ADC)测量变异性来源的评估与量化
Eur J Radiol. 2015 Sep;84(9):1729-36. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.05.032. Epub 2015 Jun 1.
9
Real-time co-registration using novel ultrasound technology: ex vivo validation and in vivo applications.实时配准使用新型超声技术:离体验证和体内应用。
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2011 Jul;24(7):720-8. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2011.02.003. Epub 2011 Mar 24.
10
Assessment of the fetal thymus gland: Comparing MRI-acquired thymus volumes with 2D ultrasound measurements.胎儿胸腺评估:比较 MRI 获得的胸腺体积与 2D 超声测量值。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021 Sep;264:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.06.026. Epub 2021 Jun 30.

本文引用的文献

1
The use of image fusion in prenatal medicine.产前医学中的图像融合技术应用。
Prenat Diagn. 2020 Jan;40(1):18-27. doi: 10.1002/pd.5558. Epub 2019 Oct 30.
2
A comparison of ultrasound with magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of fetal biometry and weight in the second trimester of pregnancy: An observer agreement and variability study.孕期中期超声与磁共振成像在评估胎儿生物测量和体重方面的比较:一项观察者一致性和变异性研究。
Ultrasound. 2018 Nov;26(4):229-244. doi: 10.1177/1742271X17753738. Epub 2018 Jan 29.
3
MRI and US in the evaluation of fetal anomalies: The need to work together.
磁共振成像(MRI)和超声(US)在胎儿畸形评估中的应用:需要协同工作。
Prenat Diagn. 2017 Dec;37(13):1343-1349. doi: 10.1002/pd.5181.
4
Ultrasound versus MRI: is there a difference in measurements of the fetal lateral ventricles?超声与磁共振成像:胎儿侧脑室测量存在差异吗?
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017 Feb;30(3):298-301. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2016.1171310. Epub 2016 Apr 19.
5
Preoperative magnetic resonance and intraoperative ultrasound fusion imaging for real-time neuronavigation in brain tumor surgery.用于脑肿瘤手术实时神经导航的术前磁共振与术中超声融合成像
Ultraschall Med. 2015 Apr;36(2):174-86. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1385347. Epub 2014 Nov 27.
6
Fusion imaging for evaluation of deep infiltrating endometriosis: feasibility and preliminary results.融合成像评估深部浸润性子宫内膜异位症:可行性及初步结果
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jul;46(1):109-17. doi: 10.1002/uog.14712.
7
MRI and ultrasound fusion imaging for prenatal diagnosis.磁共振成像和超声融合成像在产前诊断中的应用。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Aug;209(2):148.e1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.05.031. Epub 2013 May 16.
8
MRI-ultrasound fusion for guidance of targeted prostate biopsy.磁共振-超声融合引导靶向前列腺活检。
Curr Opin Urol. 2013 Jan;23(1):43-50. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0b013e32835ad3ee.
9
Intra- and interobserver variability in fetal ultrasound measurements.胎儿超声测量的内-间观察者变异性。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Mar;39(3):266-73. doi: 10.1002/uog.10082.
10
Common fetal measurements: a comparison between ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging.常见胎儿测量方法:超声与磁共振成像的比较
Acta Radiol. 2010 Feb;51(1):85-91. doi: 10.3109/02841850903334461.