Ganeshalingham Anusha, Beca John
Paediatric Intensive Care Unit, Starship Children's Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.
Transl Pediatr. 2021 Oct;10(10):2720-2737. doi: 10.21037/tp-20-386.
Severe traumatic brain injury continues to present complex management and prediction challenges for the clinician. While there is some evidence that better systems of care can improve outcome, multiple multi-centre randomised controlled trials of specific therapies have consistently failed to show benefit. In addition, clinicians are challenged in attempting to accurately predict which children will recover well and which children will have severe and persisting neurocognitive deficits. Traumatic brain injury is vastly heterogeneous and so it is not surprising that one therapy or approach, when applied to a mixed cohort of children in a clinical trial setting, has yielded disappointing results. Children with severe traumatic brain injury have vastly different brain injury pathologies of widely varying severity, in any number of anatomical locations at what may be disparate stages of brain development. This heterogeneity may also explain why clinicians are unable to accurately predict outcome. Biomarkers are objective molecular signatures of injury that are released following traumatic brain injury and may represent a way of unifying the heterogeneity of traumatic brain injury into a single biosignature. Biomarkers hold promise to diagnose brain injury severity, guide intervention selection for clinical trials, or provide vital prognostic information so that early intervention and rehabilitation can be planned much earlier in the course of a child's recovery. Serum S100B and serum NSE levels show promise as a diagnostic tool with biomarker levels significantly higher in children with severe TBI including children with inflicted and non-inflicted head injury. Serum S100B and serum NSE also show promise as a predictor of neurodevelopmental outcome. The role of biomarkers in traumatic brain injury is an evolving field with the potential for clinical application within the next few years.
严重创伤性脑损伤对临床医生而言,在管理和预测方面仍面临复杂挑战。虽然有证据表明更好的护理系统可改善预后,但针对特定疗法的多项多中心随机对照试验一直未能显示出益处。此外,临床医生在试图准确预测哪些儿童能良好康复以及哪些儿童会出现严重且持续的神经认知缺陷时也面临挑战。创伤性脑损伤具有极大的异质性,因此在临床试验环境中将一种疗法或方法应用于混合的儿童队列时产生令人失望的结果也就不足为奇了。患有严重创伤性脑损伤的儿童具有截然不同的脑损伤病理,严重程度差异很大,可发生在任何数量的解剖位置,且可能处于大脑发育的不同阶段。这种异质性也可能解释了为什么临床医生无法准确预测预后。生物标志物是创伤性脑损伤后释放的损伤客观分子特征,可能代表一种将创伤性脑损伤的异质性统一为单一生物特征的方法。生物标志物有望用于诊断脑损伤严重程度、指导临床试验的干预选择,或提供重要的预后信息,以便在儿童康复过程中更早地规划早期干预和康复。血清S100B和血清NSE水平有望成为一种诊断工具,在包括遭受和未遭受头部损伤的严重创伤性脑损伤儿童中,生物标志物水平显著更高。血清S100B和血清NSE也有望成为神经发育结局的预测指标。生物标志物在创伤性脑损伤中的作用是一个不断发展的领域,在未来几年内有临床应用的潜力。