Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Exp Neurol. 2019 Aug;318:101-123. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2019.04.019. Epub 2019 May 2.
Traumatic brain injury is a leading cause of cognitive and behavioral deficits in children in the US each year. There is an increasing interest in both clinical and pre-clinical studies to discover biomarkers to accurately diagnose traumatic brain injury (TBI), predict its outcomes, and monitor its progression especially in the developing brain. In humans, the heterogeneity of TBI in terms of clinical presentation, injury causation, and mechanism has contributed to the many challenges associated with finding unifying diagnosis, treatment, and management practices. In addition, findings from adult human research may have little application to pediatric TBI, as age and maturation levels affect the injury biomechanics and neurophysiological consequences of injury. Animal models of TBI are vital to address the variability and heterogeneity of TBI seen in human by isolating the causation and mechanism of injury in reproducible manner. However, a gap between the pre-clinical findings and clinical applications remains in TBI research today. To take a step toward bridging this gap, we reviewed several potential TBI tools such as biofluid biomarkers, electroencephalography (EEG), actigraphy, eye responses, and balance that have been explored in both clinical and pre-clinical studies and have shown potential diagnostic, prognostic, or monitoring utility for TBI. Each of these tools measures specific deficits following TBI, is easily accessible, non/minimally invasive, and is potentially highly translatable between animals and human outcomes because they involve effort-independent and non-verbal tasks. Especially conspicuous is the fact that these biomarkers and techniques can be tailored for infants and toddlers. However, translation of preclinical outcomes to clinical applications of these tools necessitates addressing several challenges. Among the challenges are the heterogeneity of clinical TBI, age dependency of some of the biomarkers, different brain structure, life span, and possible variation between temporal profiles of biomarkers in human and animals. Conducting parallel clinical and pre-clinical research, in addition to the integration of findings across species from several pre-clinical models to generate a spectrum of TBI mechanisms and severities is a path toward overcoming some of these challenges. This effort is possible through large scale collaborative research and data sharing across multiple centers. In addition, TBI causes dynamic deficits in multiple domains, and thus, a panel of biomarkers combining these measures to consider different deficits is more promising than a single biomarker for TBI. In this review, each of these tools are presented along with the clinical and pre-clinical findings, advantages, challenges and prospects of translating the pre-clinical knowledge into the human clinical setting.
创伤性脑损伤是美国每年导致儿童认知和行为缺陷的主要原因。人们对临床前和临床研究都越来越感兴趣,希望发现生物标志物来准确诊断创伤性脑损伤(TBI),预测其结果,并监测其进展,尤其是在发育中的大脑中。在人类中,TBI 在临床表现、损伤原因和机制方面的异质性导致了在寻找统一的诊断、治疗和管理实践方面存在许多挑战。此外,成人人类研究的结果可能对儿科 TBI 的应用有限,因为年龄和成熟水平会影响损伤的生物力学和神经生理学后果。TBI 动物模型对于解决人类 TBI 中的变异性和异质性至关重要,因为它可以以可重复的方式隔离损伤的原因和机制。然而,在 TBI 研究中,临床前研究结果与临床应用之间仍然存在差距。为了缩小这一差距,我们回顾了几种潜在的 TBI 工具,如生物流体生物标志物、脑电图(EEG)、活动监测仪、眼反应和平衡,这些工具在临床前和临床研究中都有探索,并显示出对 TBI 具有潜在的诊断、预后或监测作用。这些工具中的每一种都可以测量 TBI 后的特定缺陷,易于获取,非侵入性或微创性,并且由于它们涉及非努力依赖和非语言任务,因此具有在动物和人类结果之间进行高度转化的潜力。特别引人注目的是,这些生物标志物和技术可以针对婴儿和幼儿进行定制。然而,要将临床前结果转化为这些工具的临床应用,就需要解决几个挑战。其中包括临床 TBI 的异质性、一些生物标志物的年龄依赖性、不同的大脑结构、寿命以及人类和动物之间生物标志物时间谱的可能变化。开展平行的临床前和临床研究,以及整合来自多个临床前模型的物种间发现,以产生一系列 TBI 机制和严重程度,是克服这些挑战的一种途径。通过在多个中心进行大规模的协作研究和数据共享,可以实现这一努力。此外,TBI 会导致多个领域的动态缺陷,因此,将这些措施结合起来的生物标志物组合比单一的 TBI 生物标志物更有前途。在本综述中,我们介绍了每种工具以及它们的临床和临床前发现、优势、挑战和将临床前知识转化为人类临床环境的前景。