Serebruany Victor, Tanguay Jean-Francois
Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States.
Interventional Cardiology, Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
TH Open. 2021 Nov 8;5(4):e503-e506. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1736638. eCollection 2021 Oct.
Cardiovascular benefits of aggressive dual antiplatelet therapy may be associated with extra risks including bleeding, cancer, and infections discovered first for prasugrel in the TRial to assess Improvement in Therapeutic Outcomes by optimizing platelet InhibitioN with prasugrel (TRITON) trial. Ticagrelor in PLATO also caused slightly more infections but surprisingly less sepsis-related deaths (SRD) than clopidogrel. However, verified infection fatalities in PLATO were lacking from the public domain. We obtained the complete Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-issued primary causes death list, matched it with the few local site records dataset and analyzed the patterns of infections and deaths reported in PLATO. Among infections, the FDA spreadsheet contains only two primary death codes for pneumonia (12-2) and SRD (12-8). We obtained local evidence for two pneumonia and two SRD and matched those with the FDA records. We assessed how SRD patterns were reported among nonvascular death's dataset. The FDA PLATO records indicate that clopidogrel caused numerically less ( = 8) primary pneumonia deaths than ticagrelor ( = 10) but over three times more SRD ( = 23/7). Among matched verifiable outcomes, both pneumonia deaths were correct, but two clopidogrel SRD were incorrect. Of the remaining 21 clopidogrel SRD, 6 were reported as two separate closed paired entries in Brazil (lines 76 and 78 and 86 and 88) and India (lines 436 and 440), suggesting last minute addition of potentially incorrect SRD reports. Four ticagrelor SRD (lines 24,193,467 and 650) were "compensated" with close or next in line clopidogrel SRD entries (lines 22,195,468 and 651). The FDA-issued evidence suggests no benefit of ticagrelor in preventing deaths from infections with slightly more pneumonia deaths, with possible misreporting of SRD in PLATO. These findings require an in-depth precise review of sepsis deaths in this trial.
积极的双联抗血小板治疗带来的心血管益处可能与额外风险相关,包括出血、癌症和感染,这在替格瑞洛用于优化血小板抑制以评估治疗结果改善的试验(TRITON)中首次发现与普拉格雷有关。在血小板抑制和患者结局评估(PLATO)试验中,替格瑞洛也导致感染略多,但令人惊讶的是,与氯吡格雷相比,脓毒症相关死亡(SRD)更少。然而,PLATO试验中经证实的感染死亡情况在公共领域并不存在。我们获取了美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)发布的完整的主要死因清单,将其与少数本地研究点记录数据集进行匹配,并分析了PLATO试验中报告的感染和死亡模式。
在感染方面,FDA电子表格仅包含肺炎(12 - 2)和SRD(12 - 8)的两个主要死亡编码。我们获取了两例肺炎和两例SRD的本地证据,并将其与FDA记录进行匹配。我们评估了在非血管性死亡数据集中SRD模式的报告情况。
FDA的PLATO记录显示,氯吡格雷导致的原发性肺炎死亡数量(= 8)在数值上低于替格瑞洛(= 10),但SRD却多出三倍多(= 23/7)。在匹配的可验证结果中,两例肺炎死亡报告正确,但氯吡格雷的两例SRD报告错误。在其余21例氯吡格雷SRD中,有6例在巴西(第76、78、86和88行)和印度(第436和440行)被报告为两个单独的封闭配对条目,这表明可能在最后时刻添加了潜在错误的SRD报告。4例替格瑞洛SRD(第24、193、467和650行)与相近或相邻的氯吡格雷SRD条目(第22、195、468和651行)“相互抵消”。
FDA发布的证据表明,替格瑞洛在预防感染死亡方面并无益处,肺炎死亡略多,且PLATO试验中可能存在SRD报告错误。这些发现需要对该试验中的脓毒症死亡进行深入精确的审查。