Braswell Matthew, Wally Meghan K, Kempton Laurence B, Seymour Rachel B, Hsu Joseph R, Karunakar Madhav, Afetse K Eddie, Bailey Gisele, Bosse Michael, Brownrigg Maggie, Cuadra Mario, Dixon Amy, Girardi Cara, Grochowski Erica, Hysong Alexander, Jolissaint Josef, Macknet David, Mayberry R Miles, Moody Patrick, Peterson Katheryn, Phelps Kevin D, Pollock Hannah, Posey Samuel L, Reid Risa, Roe Kris, Scannell Brian, Sims Stephen, Stanley Amber, Wohler Andrew D
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Atrium Health Musculoskeletal Institute, Charlotte, NC.
OrthoCarolina Pediatric Orthopaedic Center, Charlotte, North Carolina.
OTA Int. 2021 Oct 5;4(4):e155. doi: 10.1097/OI9.0000000000000155. eCollection 2021 Dec.
Despite clinical and economic advantages, routine utilization of telemedicine remains uncommon. The purpose of this study was to examine potential disparities in access and utilization of telehealth services during the rapid transition to virtual clinic during the coronavirus pandemic.
Retrospective chart review.
Outpatient visits (in-person, telephone, virtual-Doxy.me) over a 7-week period at a Level I Trauma Center orthopaedic clinic.
Virtual visits utilizing the Doxy.me platform.
Accessing at least 1 virtual visit ("Virtual") or having telephone or in-person visits only ("No virtual").
All outpatient visits (in-person, telephone, virtual) during a 7-week period were tracked. At the end of the 7-week period, the electronic medical record was queried for each of the 641 patients who had a visit during this period for the following variables: gender, ethnicity, race, age, payer source, home zip code. Data were analyzed for both the total number of visits (n = 785) and the total number of unique patients (n = 641). Patients were identified as accessing at least 1 virtual visit ("Virtual") or having telephone or in-person visits only ("No virtual").
Weekly totals demonstrated a rapid increase from 0 to greater than 50% virtual visits by the third week of quarantine with sustained high rates of virtual visits throughout the study period. Hispanic and Black/African American patients were able to access virtual care at similar rates to White/Caucasian patients. Patients of ages 65 to 74 and 75+ accessed virtual care at lower rates than patients ≤64 ( = .003). No difference was found in rates of virtual care between payer sources. A statistically significant difference was found between patients from different zip codes ( = .028).
A rapid transition to virtual clinic can be performed at a level 1 trauma center, and high rates of virtual visits can be maintained. However, disparities in access exist and need to be addressed.
尽管远程医疗具有临床和经济优势,但常规使用远程医疗的情况仍然并不常见。本研究的目的是调查在冠状病毒大流行期间向虚拟诊所快速过渡期间,远程医疗服务在获取和使用方面可能存在的差异。
回顾性病历审查。
一级创伤中心骨科诊所在7周内的门诊就诊(面对面、电话、虚拟-Doxy.me)。
使用Doxy.me平台进行虚拟就诊。
至少进行1次虚拟就诊(“虚拟”)或仅进行电话或面对面就诊(“无虚拟就诊”)。
跟踪7周内的所有门诊就诊(面对面、电话、虚拟)。在7周结束时,查询在此期间就诊的641名患者中每一位患者的电子病历,以获取以下变量:性别、族裔、种族、年龄、付款人来源、家庭邮政编码。对就诊总数(n = 785)和唯一患者总数(n = 641)的数据进行分析。患者被确定为至少进行1次虚拟就诊(“虚拟”)或仅进行电话或面对面就诊(“无虚拟就诊”)。
每周总数显示,到隔离第三周时,虚拟就诊从0迅速增加到超过50%,并且在整个研究期间虚拟就诊率持续保持较高水平。西班牙裔和黑人/非裔美国患者获得虚拟护理的比例与白人/高加索患者相似。65至74岁和75岁及以上的患者获得虚拟护理的比例低于64岁及以下的患者(P = 0.003)。不同付款人来源之间的虚拟护理率没有差异。在来自不同邮政编码地区的患者之间发现了统计学上的显著差异(P = 0.028)。
一级创伤中心可以快速过渡到虚拟诊所,并且可以保持较高的虚拟就诊率。然而,在获取方面存在差异,需要加以解决。